🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why is gay marriage legal, but not polygamy?

Mormon church has nothing to do with it.

But there Really are no good reasons not to legalize polygamy. Heck it's always been more reasonable than same sex marriage.
Polygamy is legal, bigamy, not.

In order to allow three or more persons to marry, bigamy laws would need to be repealed, and marriage law rewritten or amended to accommodate three or more persons.

So what ? How many laws where just rendered unconstitutional by the SCOTUS decision ?
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" : (which is a compilation of hundreds of peer-reviewed studies supporting the title and the conclusion)
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.

6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... Too bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..
 
Last edited:
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" :
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.
6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... To bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..


WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?
 
WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Civil unions took care of that. Really the only thing missing between civil unions and marriage was the ability to sue adoption agencies to force them to adopt children to gay couples. And my signature sort of makes that fact a bit disturbing when considering HOW BADLY gays wanted marriage instead of just civil unions.
 
WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Civil unions took care of that. Really the only thing missing between civil unions and marriage was the ability to sue adoption agencies to force them to adopt children to gay couples. And my signature sort of makes that fact a bit disturbing when considering HOW BADLY gays wanted marriage instead of just civil unions.

They lie. They want to pretend they are normal. Now they think they are.
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" : (which is a compilation of hundreds of peer-reviewed studies supporting the title and the conclusion)
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.

6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... Too bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..

There is so much wrong with this post one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's start with your misinformation about HIV transmission. Women are at high risk for HIV because the vagina is just as absorbent as the anus. Women are at a 5 times higher risk of contracting HIV from an infected male than if their situations are reversed and she is the one with the infection.

Young people are becoming infected because they believe they are invincible and because Americans pull their kids out of sex Ed. They aren't getting proper sex education from their parents, who either don't know or don't think their little darlings would ever engage in this type of activity.

The children of fundamentalists are at greatest risk because they are taught nothing about gay sex other than its an abomination.

Children thrive when they are raised in a family where their parents love and support them. If their parents have a loving marriage, that's a bonus. But if the marriage is toxic, it would be better for the child to be raised by an emotionally healthy single parent than to grow up with parents who are miserable, unhappy and fighting.
 
There is so much wrong with this post one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's start with your misinformation about HIV transmission. Women are at high risk for HIV because the vagina is just as absorbent as the anus. Women are at a 5 times higher risk of contracting HIV from an infected male than if their situations are reversed and she is the one with the infection....

Well you're at least familiar with psychological projection...lol...

Honey, you're out of your league here. The colon is what I was talking about being highly absorptive, not the anus. And the vagina is vastly more resistant to STDs than the colon because if it wasn't, the human species probably wouldn't exist. Women would die of STD infections before their babies could even be born. If you are trying to compare the susceptability of the vagina vs the COLON (not the anus) do a little research first mmm K? Then you won't look so horribly either 1. dumb or 2. deceptive
 
but they will resort to the courts as the gays did....what will stop them now....?

Well let me ask you this- do you have any argument as to why polygamous marriage should not be married?

If you don't have such an argument- well then that is the problem with your position.

If you do have an argument- well then it still applies regardless of whether homosexuals marry or not.

the same argument as for gays....THE PEOPLE should decide....not a few old lawyers in black robes...

the majority of states, i.e. THE PEOPLE, voted against gay marriage but it was shoved through the courts anyway.....the same will happen now with polygamy......just wait until the Muslims insist on it....they are allowed to have up to 4 wives...

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what for supper

Nobody should get to vote on what rights others are entitled to

Sure, but we know that when YOU ARE the wolf you seem to think differently
Example por favor

Smoking bans DOOD
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" :
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.
6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... To bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..


WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Polygamists deserve those same rights.

What's the problem?
 
WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Civil unions took care of that. Really the only thing missing between civil unions and marriage was the ability to sue adoption agencies to force them to adopt children to gay couples.

More accurately many states didn't recognize civil unions. And civil unions didn't covey the same rights as marriage.

'Separate but equal' has an absolute shit history for one major reason; those imposing the separation are doing so because they *don't* believe what is on the other side of the separation is equal.

And my signature sort of makes that fact a bit disturbing when considering HOW BADLY gays wanted marriage instead of just civil unions.

They wanted the same rights as any other couple. And they got it.

And there's no a thing you can do about it.
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" :
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.
6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... To bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..


WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Polygamists deserve those same rights.

What's the problem?

Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.
 
There is so much wrong with this post one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's start with your misinformation about HIV transmission. Women are at high risk for HIV because the vagina is just as absorbent as the anus. Women are at a 5 times higher risk of contracting HIV from an infected male than if their situations are reversed and she is the one with the infection....

Well you're at least familiar with psychological projection...lol...

Honey, you're out of your league here. The colon is what I was talking about being highly absorptive, not the anus. And the vagina is vastly more resistant to STDs than the colon because if it wasn't, the human species probably wouldn't exist. Women would die of STD infections before their babies could even be born. If you are trying to compare the susceptability of the vagina vs the COLON (not the anus) do a little research first mmm K? Then you won't look so horribly either 1. dumb or 2. deceptive

Then explain why most HIV cases are women and children?
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" :
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.
6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... To bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..


WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Polygamists deserve those same rights.

What's the problem?

Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.

It can be made compatible. Why do you hate polygamy ?
 
Who says that homosexuality is 'deviant'? Be specific.
...well, since you asked..

A man using another man's anus and colon as an artificial vagina (closet hetero anyone?) comes with all sorts of issues.

1. Mental, he is crosswiring himself to regard a man's anus as a female receptacle for his penis.

2. The colon evolved to resorb large particles of dissolved solids and fluids to survive famine and drought. It doesn't know semen from its own digestive processes. Since the HIV virus lives quite nicely in semen, it has a superhighway right into the human bloodstream in the colon. In the vagina, there are more rigorous barriers since the vagina evolved for sex, it is a sexual organ and cleanses itself and has walls that are resistant to invasion. The colon is the lower part of the human digestive tract.

3. The HIV epidemic is spreading like wildfire, especially and disturbingly increasing in youth. This, in spite of heightened education of prevention of STDs and free condoms literally everywhere for kids to access at health clinics and the like. So the conclusion there is that more young men are "becoming gay". This suggests a social context for sexual orientation; which is born out quite well and matches the findings of this study from Quebec Canada "Conditioning and Sexual Behavior: A Review" :
http://www.pphp.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf

4. The HIV virus, growing worse in this youngest of "gay" male populations is spreading more and more through the general population as young people are far more reckless with practicing safe sex.

5. As heriocs to artificially prolong the lives of AIDS patients continues, superbugs of otherwise benign bacteria are being created and passed on to the general population.
6. Since yesterday's decision essentially normalized gay sex in the eyes of every child in America, more and more of them are likely to fall prey to the findings in the link in item #3 above. Monkey see/monkey do.

For all the "great efforts" at instructing youth on safe sex and the supposedly "fixed" number of gays in any given population (since the claim is "we're born this way!"), the following statistics are both unexplained, and alarming:
  • Youth aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States in 2010.
Marriage is a man-made construct...Unlike sex between a man and a woman, a man and a man go at it in a way that it wasn't intended....The cornhole's an exit. You don't put a penis in there....However, when it comes to people, they have generally higher intelligence, and are capable of doing really stupid, irrational things. There are a lot of things that aren't natural. Look at Furries for example, which are yet another bright and shining champion of liberalism....Along these lines, anal sex at all is unnatural, and so is oral sex. That aside, I daresay a child is in a better situation if he or she has a mommy and a daddy to raise him or her....speaking of man-made constructs, almost everything not found in nature is one. The vagina was designed to have a penis put into it, in order to achieve reproduction. That's the truth of it: if people weren't bumping naughties, there'd be no people. What the hell is the evolutionary purpose for putting dick in asshole? Pleasure? Don't masochists do weird s*** for pleasure, too? Makes no sense at all, and I'm content with keeping my distance as society circles the drain.

I can see we are in full agreement. But now that SCOTUS has matched the two freight trains pound for pound heading towards each other at top speed (Hobby Lobby and yesterday's Ruling), we will watch as the polygamy train joins the tracks..

At least polygamists provide a mother and father for the most important people in marriage... To bad SCOTUS couldn't figure out who marriage was for and why. That would've been my starting point in deliberations if I was a Justice. Obviously it wasn't theirs..


WHAT ? You mean marriage isn't a vehicle to receive federal benefits and get you into to the hospital to see your mate ?

Polygamists deserve those same rights.

What's the problem?

Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.

So was same sex

Bigot
 
Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.

So was same sex

Bigot

I know, for a minute there I almost thought Skylar was the attorney for the traditional marriage people at the SCOTUS Hearing this last Spring! Gee Skylar, that reverse of position took you what, like 18 hours to accomplish after last Friday's insane and unworkable Ruling (Hobby Lobby freight train coming its way..)?

Here's Skylar's "solid legal position"...>> man/woman father/mother marriage < :fu:

But on just two people being married, suddenly we have an 18th Century prude on our hands > :bowdown: 2

And that's what you call a hypocritical bigot who was never about true marriage equality from day one. He was about promoting a cult instead that as yet doesn't want to advertise the "P" component because it migh spook the straights..and get this thing overturned..
 
Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.

So was same sex

Bigot

I know, for a minute there I almost thought Skylar was the attorney for the traditional marriage people at the SCOTUS Hearing this last Spring! Gee Skylar, that reverse of position took you what, like 18 hours to accomplish after last Friday's insane and unworkable Ruling (Hobby Lobby freight train coming its way..)?

Here's Skylar's "solid legal position"...>> man/woman father/mother marriage < :fu:

But on just two people being married, suddenly we have an 18th Century prude on our hands > :bowdown: 2

And that's what you call a hypocritical bigot who was never about true marriage equality from day one. He was about promoting a cult instead that as yet doesn't want to advertise the "P" component because it migh spook the straights..and get this thing overturned..

Classic Liberal hypocrisy. Equality is only for them and on their terms. By all rights they should simply be ignored for this dogma they repeat over and over.
 
Polygamy is incompatible with our marriage laws. As you've already admitted. And that incompatibility would establish a valid justification for not incorporating polygamy.

Same sex marriage has been compatible with 2 person marriage from the moment we recognized men and women as equal partners. The second that happened....same sex marriage was inevitable. As it resolved the only incompatibility between same sex marriage and hetero marriage.

So was same sex

Bigot

I know, for a minute there I almost thought Skylar was the attorney for the traditional marriage people at the SCOTUS Hearing this last Spring! Gee Skylar, that reverse of position took you what, like 18 hours to accomplish after last Friday's insane and unworkable Ruling (Hobby Lobby freight train coming its way..)?

Here's Skylar's "solid legal position"...>> man/woman father/mother marriage < :fu:

But on just two people being married, suddenly we have an 18th Century prude on our hands > :bowdown: 2

And that's what you call a hypocritical bigot who was never about true marriage equality from day one. He was about promoting a cult instead that as yet doesn't want to advertise the "P" component because it migh spook the straights..and get this thing overturned..

Shoes on the other foot now, right.

Let's say a husband and wife have a father who owns a couple section of valuable farm land. The fathers wife died so the land will pass to the son with a hefty inheritance tax.

It would be difficult to prove the three don't love each other and they won't be moving in together, why not simply all marry and rid themselves of the huge tax burden?

As an all inclusive nation we should allow such relationship or declare ourselves hypocritical bigots, right?
 
Is the Mormon church going to be the next decision for the SC?

Thoughts?

LMAO!!!! Can I still do that? Polygamy IS illegal, you freak. The LDS Church outlawed it years ago and it's illegal by federal law, too.

This is why the Republican party is such a mess....
 

Forum List

Back
Top