CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
I am Jewish . Hello???What precisely do you mean by "revelation"?
You're a priest and you don't know what revelation is?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am Jewish . Hello???What precisely do you mean by "revelation"?
You're a priest and you don't know what revelation is?
What precisely do you mean by "revelation"?
You're a priest and you don't know what revelation is?
You are much like those Rabbis who instructed me Ropey and In fact I am now wondering if you are a Rabbi? (I do not for a minute believe Cmike is either Rabbi or Priest as he claims because he seems to know so little about the scriptures he defends but if I am wrong about that, it is of no consequence.)
I take it that one reason you reject the Christian's messiah is based on your closing emphasized line: One does NOT kill or harm their offspring.
Are you speaking of the Christian G-D who gave his only son? Again there are such dichotomies. Was not Abraham blessed when he was williing to sacrifice Isaac as a burnt offering when YHWH commanded him to do that? As the story goes, YHWH did not require him to go through with it, but Abraham's faith was tested nevertheless in his willingness to do that.
So fast forward thousands of years to First Century BC. G-d gave his only son as a sacrifice to cover the sins of all. Why would he do that when as G-d he could have simply forgiven those sins? But would the people have ever understood with a blood sacrifice had always been required for the remission of sins? But kill his own son? Yes. But in Christian belief he WAS that son as well as the Father of that son. And that is the ultimate of the Christian gospel: G-D loves us so much that he was willing to suffer the pain of a father watching his son die a terrible death and G-D loves us so much that he was willing to become one of us--the Word became flesh--and suffer anddie on the cross for us.
It is the greatest of all mysteries within Christian beliefs.
And there has never been a Christian command, except among those who put distorted doctrine or dogma ahead of the Gospel, for anyone to sacrifice any other person or any living thing since that time. G-d himself became man, wholly human, and made himself the ultimate sacrifice. As Jesus said, he came not to do away with the Law, but to fulfill the Law.
The Christian believes this. But without a solid grounding in Old Testament history and teachings, it would make no sense at all.
I am Jewish . Hello???What precisely do you mean by "revelation"?
You're a priest and you don't know what revelation is?
What precisely do you mean by "revelation"?
You're a priest and you don't know what revelation is?
Kohen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Biker is on my ignore list, but someone please tell him that I think he's gay![]()
If Jesus was born in Jeruselem then he is Jewish right? But, in every church I have visited both Black and White he is not as the bible describes: woolly hair, brown skin. Instead he is a White man. Why is that?
If Jesus was born in Jeruselem then he is Jewish right? But, in every church I have visited both Black and White he is not as the bible describes: woolly hair, brown skin. Instead he is a White man. Why is that?
as time passes, churches and religions create their own vesion of jesus (what he looks like).
does that deminish the what jesus said or professed when he walked the earth, NO.
If Jesus was born in Jeruselem then he is Jewish right? But, in every church I have visited both Black and White he is not as the bible describes: woolly hair, brown skin. Instead he is a White man. Why is that?
as time passes, churches and religions create their own vesion of jesus (what he looks like).
does that deminish the what jesus said or professed when he walked the earth, NO.
No, but it does make you wonder: if time has the ability to change his appearance and his very NAME, then why on earth do you believe that the stories of his life were passed down accurately? Why do you believe some half-baked hallucination by someone who never met the man is valid? We can't even get his skin color right. Imagine how believable it would be if someone today had a "vision" of Jesus and was told he needed to write it for inclusion in the bible. How reasonable does that sound today?
No, visual changes does not change what was written, but you have to wonder how many changes the written had seen as well.
If Jesus was born in Jeruselem then he is Jewish right? But, in every church I have visited both Black and White he is not as the bible describes: woolly hair, brown skin. Instead he is a White man. Why is that?
as time passes, churches and religions create their own vesion of jesus (what he looks like).
does that deminish the what jesus said or professed when he walked the earth, NO.
No, but it does make you wonder: if time has the ability to change his appearance and his very NAME, then why on earth do you believe that the stories of his life were passed down accurately? Why do you believe some half-baked hallucination by someone who never met the man is valid? We can't even get his skin color right. Imagine how believable it would be if someone today had a "vision" of Jesus and was told he needed to write it for inclusion in the bible. How reasonable does that sound today?
No, visual changes does not change what was written, but you have to wonder how many changes the written had seen as well.
You have no solid ground of the Torah, because the Torah clearly contradicts the christian fundamental beliefs of centering it around jesus.
According to the G-D that I believe in there is:
1) One G-D
2) That G-D is not divided
3) You may only put your faith in him, no one else
4) Worshipping any one else in any manner is perhaps the greatest of all sins.
Obviously, your religion and my religion are mutually exclusive.
Seriously?? I think you need to go back and read what you've said, and face the truth about yourself.![]()
Troll
Yet another name?![]()
Obviously Dummy offers nothing other than trolling.
You know......you've got to wonder about someone who calls themselves a kohan yet doesn't know that it's really close to rabbi.
Additionally, taking any kind of theological "facts" from some idiot who confuses Joshua with Yeshua is equally stupid.
Too bad he's got me on ignore, but, I can tell you all something..........if you call CMike "**** Mike" just a couple of times, he'll ignore you too.
Obviously Dummy offers nothing other than trolling.
Yet another name? You make a fool of yourself Mike.![]()
They can believe whatever they want, without me caring.You have no solid ground of the Torah, because the Torah clearly contradicts the christian fundamental beliefs of centering it around jesus.
According to the G-D that I believe in there is:
1) One G-D
2) That G-D is not divided
3) You may only put your faith in him, no one else
4) Worshipping any one else in any manner is perhaps the greatest of all sins.
Obviously, your religion and my religion are mutually exclusive.
What is it with you man? You say you're Jewish? It is not the Jewish way to convince non-Jews that you are right with you religious beliefs. No proselytizing get? Respect other people's religious beliefs and go on about you're business.. So long as they don't want to cut of you're head of course.
If Jesus was born in Jeruselem then he is Jewish right? But, in every church I have visited both Black and White he is not as the bible describes: woolly hair, brown skin. Instead he is a White man. Why is that?
as time passes, churches and religions create their own vesion of jesus (what he looks like).
does that deminish the what jesus said or professed when he walked the earth, NO.
No, but it does make you wonder: if time has the ability to change his appearance and his very NAME, then why on earth do you believe that the stories of his life were passed down accurately? Why do you believe some half-baked hallucination by someone who never met the man is valid? We can't even get his skin color right. Imagine how believable it would be if someone today had a "vision" of Jesus and was told he needed to write it for inclusion in the bible. How reasonable does that sound today?
No, visual changes does not change what was written, but you have to wonder how many changes the written had seen as well.
You know......you've got to wonder about someone who calls themselves a kohan yet doesn't know that it's really close to rabbi.
Additionally, taking any kind of theological "facts" from some idiot who confuses Joshua with Yeshua is equally stupid.
Too bad he's got me on ignore, but, I can tell you all something..........if you call CMike "**** Mike" just a couple of times, he'll ignore you too.
You have no solid ground of the Torah, because the Torah clearly contradicts the christian fundamental beliefs of centering it around jesus.
According to the G-D that I believe in there is:
1) One G-D
2) That G-D is not divided
3) You may only put your faith in him, no one else
4) Worshipping any one else in any manner is perhaps the greatest of all sins.
Obviously, your religion and my religion are mutually exclusive.