WOW! Bill Clinton slams the GOP in Benghazi.

Apples and unicorn farts, which apparently rdean is snorting heavily today.


As conservatives, Hillary is the best we could possibly hope for as an opponent. Corruption, cronyism, incompetence, all in one package:cool:

There is no evidence that Hillary is corrupt. None. Even the conservatives who accuse her of corruption admit they have no evidence.

Cronyism is rampant in both business and politics, and it's not necessarily a bad thing, especially considering Hillary's incredible list of connections.

Hillary's resume is impressive and she is both competent and thorough. Committee members she worked with in the Senate praised her abilities to work with others. Aside from Republicans, the rest of the World consider her the best Secretary of State in recent memory.

And although conservatives won't believe it, Hillary had a large part in helping Obama to restore world wide respect for the US and the office of President, which W had destroyed.
6900e22130e77b88a417cd939fef6bc4092459b5070f36cea0250645b2082359.jpg
 
Watching Bill Clinton in Indiana talking about Benghazi was amazing. He pointed out the hundreds of Americans under Reagan that died in Lebanon for no apparent reason.

We all know that Reagan quickly cut and ran after he let all those Americans die.

And how many hearings did the GOP house have on why all those young Americans died and why they weren't protected after Reagan sent them there?

Guess.

Give up?

1

One measly hearing. And Republicans complain Democrats are given "special" treatment. I guess they are. Democrats are mis-treated. Unlike Republicans. Who protect their own. No matter how many Americans die for no apparent reason.

Yes Kennedy who ramped the war in Vietnam before he was assassinated.

Nixon ended the illegal war of Kennedy and LBJ.

Silly far left drones!

It was Eisenhower who first sent troops to Viet Nam. JFK and LBJ both increased that presence, and Nixon who went all in on it.

And Nixon didn't "end the war", he lost it. The last Americans left Viet Nam by helicopter as the North Vietnamese overran the capital.

Yes I see this all the time when you shoe the heros of the far left in thrie true light.

Although as I mentioned before Kennedy ramped up the war in Vietnam.

Nixon did end the war, to the far left what difference does it make? The war was ended.

Just like the Obama cut and run caused the world to have the largest terrorist group ever. But that does not matter as long as they can blame others and not the one who caused it. So are you going to admit that Obama lost the war in Iraq?
 
Apples and unicorn farts, which apparently rdean is snorting heavily today.


As conservatives, Hillary is the best we could possibly hope for as an opponent. Corruption, cronyism, incompetence, all in one package:cool:

Yeah.....only in the minds of right-wingers.....but they haven't been able to prove any of it, so they decide to elect one that is all they claim Hillary to be....and there is definite evidence of it.
Trump's 4 bankruptcies....fake Trump University, won't make tax returns public, lies about being charitable....etc., etc.
 
Apples and unicorn farts, which apparently rdean is snorting heavily today.


As conservatives, Hillary is the best we could possibly hope for as an opponent. Corruption, cronyism, incompetence, all in one package:cool:

Yeah.....only in the minds of right-wingers.....but they haven't been able to prove any of it, so they decide to elect one that is all they claim Hillary to be....and there is definite evidence of it.
Trump's 4 bankruptcies....fake Trump University, won't make tax returns public, lies about being charitable....etc., etc.


I'm a Cruz supporter, but Hillary is an easy target for someone like Trump....The triviality of your thinking is noted:rolleyes:
 
Apples and unicorn farts, which apparently rdean is snorting heavily today.


As conservatives, Hillary is the best we could possibly hope for as an opponent. Corruption, cronyism, incompetence, all in one package:cool:

Yeah.....only in the minds of right-wingers.....but they haven't been able to prove any of it, so they decide to elect one that is all they claim Hillary to be....and there is definite evidence of it.
Trump's 4 bankruptcies....fake Trump University, won't make tax returns public, lies about being charitable....etc., etc.


I'm a Cruz supporter, but Hillary is an easy target for someone like Trump....The triviality of your thinking is noted:rolleyes:

Oh, you support Lucifer in the Flesh? Bwahahaha! Why am I not surprised. Cruz may be worse than Trump...but apparently not one to worry about, he's not making much headway.
 
Yeah.....only in the minds of right-wingers.....but they haven't been able to prove any of it, so they decide to elect one that is all they claim Hillary to be....and there is definite evidence of it.
Trump's 4 bankruptcies....fake Trump University, won't make tax returns public, lies about being charitable....etc., etc.
Could you tell me how many of these charges have been proved against Trump? And, btw, how scandalss has Trump been implicated, as sheer numbers I mean? Oh yeah, did Trump boast about dodging sniper fire or dismiss the murders of of Americans by saying : What difference does it make?"?
 
Apples and unicorn farts, which apparently rdean is snorting heavily today.


As conservatives, Hillary is the best we could possibly hope for as an opponent. Corruption, cronyism, incompetence, all in one package:cool:

Yeah.....only in the minds of right-wingers.....but they haven't been able to prove any of it, so they decide to elect one that is all they claim Hillary to be....and there is definite evidence of it.
Trump's 4 bankruptcies....fake Trump University, won't make tax returns public, lies about being charitable....etc., etc.


I'm a Cruz supporter, but Hillary is an easy target for someone like Trump....The triviality of your thinking is noted:rolleyes:

Oh, you support Lucifer in the Flesh? Bwahahaha! Why am I not surprised. Cruz may be worse than Trump...but apparently not one to worry about, he's not making much headway.

Anyone voting for Hilary is supporting Lucifer..
 
Watching Bill Clinton in Indiana talking about Benghazi was amazing. He pointed out the hundreds of Americans under Reagan that died in Lebanon for no apparent reason.

We all know that Reagan quickly cut and ran after he let all those Americans die.

And how many hearings did the GOP house have on why all those young Americans died and why they weren't protected after Reagan sent them there?

Guess.

Give up?

1

One measly hearing. And Republicans complain Democrats are given "special" treatment. I guess they are. Democrats are mis-treated. Unlike Republicans. Who protect their own. No matter how many Americans die for no apparent reason.
Yep......when you have no valid excuse for your own negligence.....bring up somebody else to deflect.
The Negligence belongs to the GOP.

How Republicans cut Benghazi security and blamed Hillary

In February 2011, over a year and a half before Benghazi, Hillary warned that the Tea Party’s continued refusal to adequately fund her State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection infrastructure was “detrimental to America’s national security.”

Republicans ignored her. Instead, conservatives cut an additional $331 million from embassy security for 2012, and then promptly proposed $216 million more cuts for fiscal year 2013. In fact, Paul Ryan’s budgets would have slashed $400 million from State Department security by 2014 while giving breaks to millionaires and billionaires.

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, a close ally of Hillary, slammed the Republican diplomacy cuts at the time as “a disturbing example of the Republicans’ meat-ax approach to cutting every aspect of the government, no matter how essential.”
That has been to constant excuse by liberals in Washington, that the Tea Party cut funding, and that caused all of the crap that happened while liberals were in charge. Problem is, the Tea Party never ran the GOP. The GOP Establishment and Democrats ran it. The Sequester was Obamas idea. Any cutting that took place was his doing.

I saw a pattern with the way Clinton ran the government back in the 90s and during the Obama Administration. Hillary was the cause of most of the problems when her husband was president, and most of the problems in the Obama Administration. It was pretty much laid out during Watergate when she was fired. She is a disaster waiting to happen......and every time she fucks up....she tries to cover it up. The only reason she wasn't the focus in 93' after Blackhawk Down was because she was First Lady.

clintons-do-you-see-a-pattern_thumb4.jpg


0.jpg
image-1.jpeg

If it was your money and your company would you hire her to do anything given her resume of failures?
No.
Obama obviously felt she could be useful in the state department.....because she could be counted on to handle various illegal deals. I don't think he counted on her causing so much turmoil.
 
Did you not notice apostrophes and lower case w? It was never a declared war; it was military intervention at the invitation of a sovereign government and country of strategic interest to the U.S. at the time. The 'war' was stupid and wrong, but not illegal, as the Iraq 'war' of 'W' was.
 
Did you not notice apostrophes and lower case w? It was never a declared war; it was military intervention at the invitation of a sovereign government and country of strategic interest to the U.S. at the time. The 'war' was stupid and wrong, but not illegal, as the Iraq 'war' of 'W' was.

And the far left scriptures come out!

See how the far left will defend their GOD's and ignore the 1991 and 2003 declarations made by Congress!

Vietnam was an illegal war.
Just like all of Obama's wars..
 
Would it not be fairer to say that Congress allowed these military actions to take place because they lacked the courage to either declare war or to say no to the war machine? The House of Representatives controls the money, unless a president sells stolen weapons illegally and uses the mis-gotten gains out of Constitutional legality.

In Vietnam, the fighting (war) ended in 1975 when Vietnamese forces captured the capitol city of South Vietnam.

It is entirely inaccurate to associate there4eyeM's posts with anything other than eclecticism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top