Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that's what we call denial.
daws101
your point? there were no cutters of any kind used in the 911 attack!
your proof is meaningless.
you're not even brave enough to post your links to it.
really chicken shit .
Now that was precious, when does your amoeba brain split?
Nice animated gif of molten aluminum dripping. Too bad that one image destroys your hallucinations. If it were planted thermite, there would have been hundreds, if not thousands, of such sightings. Instead, between 3 skyscrapers totaling about 250 stories -- there was one. And it burned for almost an hour until the building collapsed.
daws101
your point? there were no cutters of any kind used in the 911 attack!
your proof is meaningless.
you're not even brave enough to post your links to it.
really chicken shit .
Now that was precious, when does your amoeba brain split?
bahahahahahahah!foia releases.
Never been to the nist site eh?
and foolish enough to argue with me? interesting.
you can do the same thing by turning the brightness down and contrast up on your computer monitor, but most debunkers /huggers and posers are too tarded to do that with anything they do not want to see.
No material alteration, something else tards do not understand.
they lit that fucker right up.
If not thermite then linear shaped charges, unless you think osama bin laden cloned himself and flipped lights on and off on every other floor in perfect demolition sequence.
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
bahahahahahahah!foia releases.
Never been to the nist site eh?
and foolish enough to argue with me? interesting.
you can do the same thing by turning the brightness down and contrast up on your computer monitor, but most debunkers /huggers and posers are too tarded to do that with anything they do not want to see.
No material alteration, something else tards do not understand.
they lit that fucker right up.
If not thermite then linear shaped charges, unless you think osama bin laden cloned himself and flipped lights on and off on every other floor in perfect demolition sequence.
maybe one day you'll learn something real.
Contrast is the difference in luminance and/or color that makes an object (or its representation in an image or display) distinguishable. In visual perception of the real world, contrast is determined by the difference in the color and brightness of the object and other objects within the same field of view. Because the human visual system is more sensitive to contrast than absolute luminance, we can perceive the world similarly regardless of the huge changes in illumination over the day or from place to place. The maximum contrast of an image is the contrast ratio or dynamic range.
Contrast is also the difference between the color or shading of the printed material on a document and the background on which it is printed, for example in optical character recognition.
Brightness
there is no way to know by fucking with those controls if the" bright spots" are explosions, fire or thermite.
- Brightness is an attribute of visual perception in which a source appears to be radiating or reflecting light. In other words, brightness is the perception elicited by the luminance of a visual target. This is a subjective attribute/property of an object being observed.
In other words, brightness is the perception elicited by the luminance of a visual target. This is a subjective attribute/property of an object being observed.
asshat.
Nice animated gif of molten aluminum dripping. Too bad that one image destroys your hallucinations. If it were planted thermite, there would have been hundreds, if not thousands, of such sightings. Instead, between 3 skyscrapers totaling about 250 stories -- there was one. And it burned for almost an hour until the building collapsed.
daws101
your point? there were no cutters of any kind used in the 911 attack!
your proof is meaningless.
you're not even brave enough to post your links to it.
really chicken shit .
Now that was precious, when does your amoeba brain split?
You are truly demented. Only a fruit loop dingus is incapable of noticing the demolitions you post exhibit explosions before the structures begin to collapse. Unlike the Twin Towers.
[/QUOTE]
bahahahahahahah!foia releases.
Never been to the nist site eh?
and foolish enough to argue with me? interesting.
you can do the same thing by turning the brightness down and contrast up on your computer monitor, but most debunkers /huggers and posers are too tarded to do that with anything they do not want to see.
No material alteration, something else tards do not understand.
they lit that fucker right up.
If not thermite then linear shaped charges, unless you think osama bin laden cloned himself and flipped lights on and off on every other floor in perfect demolition sequence.
maybe one day you'll learn something real.
Contrast is the difference in luminance and/or color that makes an object (or its representation in an image or display) distinguishable. In visual perception of the real world, contrast is determined by the difference in the color and brightness of the object and other objects within the same field of view. Because the human visual system is more sensitive to contrast than absolute luminance, we can perceive the world similarly regardless of the huge changes in illumination over the day or from place to place. The maximum contrast of an image is the contrast ratio or dynamic range.
Contrast is also the difference between the color or shading of the printed material on a document and the background on which it is printed, for example in optical character recognition.
Brightness
there is no way to know by fucking with those controls if the" bright spots" are explosions, fire or thermite.
- Brightness is an attribute of visual perception in which a source appears to be radiating or reflecting light. In other words, brightness is the perception elicited by the luminance of a visual target. This is a subjective attribute/property of an object being observed.
In other words, brightness is the perception elicited by the luminance of a visual target. This is a subjective attribute/property of an object being observed.
asshat.
One? WTF are you smokin? Too much arsenic man.
One? WTF are you smokin? Too much arsenic man.
Yanno, I just noticed. You have received 19 attaboys for your 1273 posts. 19 times your fellow posters thought your angry, desperate, silly 9/11 CTBS was worth positive recognition. 19 ... 19 ... 19 ... hmm. I do believe you are the singular most disrespected poster at USMB and your work here has done more to discredit the 9/11 "Truther" Movement than all those who disagree with and/or ridicule your silliness, combined. Thank you.
What a pity you have no proof an actual one ever existed in 2001.Posted for those who have more than 1 brain cell, not the above retard.
the above is bullshit, here is a thermate cutter.
Speaking of eyewitnesses .... still waiting for you to provide an example of a video recorded of the west side of the south tower exploding without a plane hitting it.Posted for those who have more than 1 brain cell, not the above retard.
the above is bullshit, here is a thermate cutter.
Several enormous problems with that analysis. If we're talking about WTC 7, Koko has imagined that they went off on the top floors. Meaning they would have been near the top of the debris pile. Yet....nothing. None was ever found. And there would have had to have been thousands. These would have been huge, enormously heavy canisters each about 10 to 12 feet long and about 3.5 to 4 feet in diameter, sticking sideways off the side of each girder. On each floor. By the thousands. ...
Several enormous problems with that analysis. If we're talking about WTC 7, Koko has imagined that they went off on the top floors. Meaning they would have been near the top of the debris pile. Yet....nothing. None was ever found. And there would have had to have been thousands. These would have been huge, enormously heavy canisters each about 10 to 12 feet long and about 3.5 to 4 feet in diameter, sticking sideways off the side of each girder. On each floor. By the thousands. ...
There were many things (some quite large and composed primarily of steel and other metal alloys) that should have been recognizable in the debris piles from all three buildings. In the Twin Towers, for instance, there were two sub-stations each on the 108th, 75th, 41st, and 7th floors of both towers. At those 8 locations there were 4 massive transformers per sub-station that weighed in excess of 4 tons apiece. These were air-cooled, dry-type transformers that wouldn't have exploded on their own, yet after the "collapses" there wasn't a trace of evidence in the debris piles that any of them ever existed, unless one considers the pools/streams of molten metals observed by several independent witnesses as a possible explanation for their otherwise apparent absence among the wreckage.
In my opinion, the use of thermate cutter charges, nano-thermite coatings, and other more effective 'explosives' aren't mutually exclusive propositions. Explosives could have been placed on or near the outward-facing sides of the beams, while thermate cutter charges were placed on the inward-facing sides. The expected effect would have been one of lateral ejections of pulverized concrete that clouded the brilliance of the internal thermitic reactions, like so many clouds over sunlight on an overcast day...
And what about people who recorded it? There were dozens upon dozens. According to your delusions, not one of them captured a plane flying into the south tower ... find ONE of them screaming about how someone edited that plane into their video.
Of course, there is still the small matter of how your alleged CD rigging survived the impact of the jets and the ensuing fires but why bother with such annoying details when one can write pages of CTBS by simply ignoring reality. Carry on.
Skylar said:. . .the buildings were on fire. With building fires scattered across the WTC 1 and 2. And WTC [7?] fully engaged with fires on virtually all floors. Any aparatus of explosive demolition, timers, det cord, radio receivers, control boards, etc.....would have melted. Yet per the thermite theory, they went off in perfect sequence. There's simply no way for this type of coordination to have been accomplished in a burning building.
Skylar said:. . .these buildings weren't museums. They were occupied. They were regularly inspected. They were maintained. They were cleaned. With each floor having 249 outer panels and 47 core columns, and there being 90 floors to the ground from the impact site on the north tower and 79 to the ground on the south......that means that there would have had to have been over 50,000 car sized thermite canisters sticking sideways in WTC 1 and 2.
Skylar said:......that means that there would have had to have been over 50,000 car sized thermite canisters sticking sideways in WTC 1 and 2.
You have zero evidence that any one of them had to flee the country, no less ALL of them. But thanks; your contrived notion goes a long way in revealing how you'll desperately offer any excuse imaginable to further your delusions.And what about people who recorded it? There were dozens upon dozens. According to your delusions, not one of them captured a plane flying into the south tower ... find ONE of them screaming about how someone edited that plane into their video.
yeh and be forced to move out of the country to avoid persecution or being murdered.
there are hundreds of witnesses on record who said there were no planes, but you pretend those facts do not exist.
link ?And what about people who recorded it? There were dozens upon dozens. According to your delusions, not one of them captured a plane flying into the south tower ... find ONE of them screaming about how someone edited that plane into their video.
yeh and be forced to move out of the country to avoid persecution or being murdered.
there are hundreds of witnesses on record who said there were no planes, but you pretend those facts do not exist.
