Almost $18.5 Trillion in debt.

[bedowin62]

tax hikes

not the dot-com revolution

not welfare reform
not lower capital gains taxes

are the reason for the booming 90s

you heard it here, from this loser folks!!

 

[Ame®icano]

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

You mean like in the 90's, AFTER Clinton's tax increase.

No, I mean like Reagan did before him.

Clinton didn't grow shit, dot.com did all the work.

 

[bedowin62]

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

The GOP is to cut taxes further, which means that every dollar of growth in the economy will yield even less revenue than it does now. That is what always happens with GOP voodoo

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

left -wing nutjobs are insisting the economy is growing, they got their tax hike on the richest, they say government is smaller under obama, and imply lower deficits mean lower national debt. then why isnt the national debt decreasing?

oh yea there's still rich people around with some money not confiscated yet

We had surpluses for 3 years under Clinton. Bush got rid of that as fast he could, with tax cuts.

WE HAD "surpluses" because of tax hikes you IDIOT???

YOU DO realize the government is only supposed to take what it needs to run the country????

Why did Bush cut taxes twice in the face of two wars when it was inevitable that those wars would add massive amounts of spending to the budget?

stop changing the subject idiot. we're talking about your premise that tax hikes r the reason for the sucesful econnomy of the clinton years

 

[NYcarbineer]

it's a simple question. so nobody gets your wrong

you're saying tax hikes are the reason for the economic success of the clinton yearz??/?


yes or no?????

Of course they were. They proved that we could have good growth without borrowing it like Reagan and Bush before Clinton did.

 

[bedowin62]

THE VERY RICHEST make their money on capital gains. CLINTON LOWERED THAT, but leftard says only the tax hikes on the ones making less than the richest are responsible for economic success!1

WOW!!

How much revenue would we collect from zero taxes?

who proposes that??????

 

[bedowin62]

it's a simple question. so nobody gets your wrong

you're saying tax hikes are the reason for the economic success of the clinton yearz??/?


yes or no?????

Of course they were. They proved that we could have good growth without borrowing it like Reagan and Bush before Clinton did.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!1




i have GOT to save this post!!!

 

[Ame®icano]

THE VERY RICHEST make their money on capital gains. CLINTON LOWERED THAT, but leftard says only the tax hikes on the ones making less than the richest are responsible for economic success!1

WOW!!

How much revenue would we collect from zero taxes?

About the same as if we collect 100% taxes.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

You mean like in the 90's, AFTER Clinton's tax increase.

No, I mean like Reagan did before him.

Clinton didn't grow shit, dot.com did all the work.

The stock market was up 200% over the course of the Clinton presidency even counting the 2000 bubble burst.

 

[bedowin62]

so welfare reform (that obama gutted) had nothing to do with balanced budgets or economic sucdess/


yes or no??

 

[NYcarbineer]

it's a simple question. so nobody gets your wrong

you're saying tax hikes are the reason for the economic success of the clinton yearz??/?


yes or no?????

Of course they were. They proved that we could have good growth without borrowing it like Reagan and Bush before Clinton did.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!1




i have GOT to save this post!!!

Why don't you refute it first.

 

[bedowin62]

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

You mean like in the 90's, AFTER Clinton's tax increase.

No, I mean like Reagan did before him.

Clinton didn't grow shit, dot.com did all the work.

The stock market was up 200% over the course of the Clinton presidency even counting the 2000 bubble burst.

tax hikes did that right????



lmao!!

 

[bedowin62]

it's a simple question. so nobody gets your wrong

you're saying tax hikes are the reason for the economic success of the clinton yearz??/?


yes or no?????

Of course they were. They proved that we could have good growth without borrowing it like Reagan and Bush before Clinton did.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!1




i have GOT to save this post!!!

Why don't you refute it first.

i can fill up this website with articles on the dot-com revolution

youre stupidity needs no rebuttal

 

[NYcarbineer]

Paying down 20 trillion in debt will take 20 trillion of American taxpayer dollars. That's 20 trillion above and beyond the tax dollars needed to run the government.

Are you willing to chip in? It's your debt remember.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To pay down the debt takes TAX REVENUE.

Are you prepared to pay the taxes needed to do that?

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

You mean like in the 90's, AFTER Clinton's tax increase.

No, I mean like Reagan did before him.

Clinton didn't grow shit, dot.com did all the work.

The stock market was up 200% over the course of the Clinton presidency even counting the 2000 bubble burst.

tax hikes did that right????



lmao!!

Tax hikes got rid of the deficit.

 

[bedowin62]

How about growing the economy to collect more taxes?

You mean like in the 90's, AFTER Clinton's tax increase.

No, I mean like Reagan did before him.

Clinton didn't grow shit, dot.com did all the work.

The stock market was up 200% over the course of the Clinton presidency even counting the 2000 bubble burst.

tax hikes did that right????



lmao!!

Tax hikes got rid of the deficit.

not the 21 month time limit for welfare/

not increase revenue from the DOT-COM REVOLUTION??

UR A FREAKIN JOKE!!

LMAO

 

[Ame®icano]

it's a simple question. so nobody gets your wrong

you're saying tax hikes are the reason for the economic success of the clinton yearz??/?


yes or no?????

Of course they were. They proved that we could have good growth without borrowing it like Reagan and Bush before Clinton did.

Without borrowing...

Taking money from SS wasn't borrowing, right?

Btw, if Clinton's budget was balanced, then how debt increased cca $1.5T?

 

[bedowin62]

lowerin capital gains didnt effect the stock market??

people didnt invest in ventures?

wow you're an economic GENIUS!!

LMAO11

 

[bedowin62]

Paying down 20 trillion in debt will take 20 trillion of American taxpayer dollars. That's 20 trillion above and beyond the tax dollars needed to run the government.

Are you willing to chip in? It's your debt remember.

the rich already pay most of the taxes collected

give ti it hurts leftard

 

[Ame®icano]

Paying down 20 trillion in debt will take 20 trillion of American taxpayer dollars. That's 20 trillion above and beyond the tax dollars needed to run the government.

Are you willing to chip in? It's your debt remember.

Actually, it will take $20T plus interest of cca $400B plus a year, depending on rates.

 

[bedowin62]

leftard says tax hikes only are responsible for the 90's economic boom

this is going on my tag line!!