Assault weapons and bomb-carrying robots.....

[IsaacNewton]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

If we follow that same mindset, should the average American be ALSO able to purchase a bomb-carrying robot under the rationale that anything that law enforcement may have the average American is also entitled to have? .

They can't have an honest discussion about this. They'll parse words like a 45 year old hairdresser who keeps her Christmas lights up year round on the porch of her double-wide. The same way they lawyer the bible so Jesus approves of torture and hating others. It's who they are.

Interesting that you know all about double-wides, and TORTURE.... Please do NOT get any pets!

You're projecting your internal tendencies again Cubby. Careful now, you are using your outside voice to speak of your inside things.

 

[2aguy]

can it be in the future, yes....so we do not have the right to surrender the very weapons our children, grand children or great grand children may need to keep themselves alive.......you guys are so short sighted I wonder how you don't walk into walls..

Its rather "amazing" how all of the right wing paranoia about "defending humanity" from the hordes of [who the fuck knows]....Muslims, blacks, Mexicans, Gays, federal black-booted thugs, etc., ONLY surfaces when we got a mulatto president.

Are you a moron......did you have a car crash where the memory centers of your brain were destroyed...........immigration sank john mcCains presidential hopes...as conservatives actually remembered the gang of 8 who wanted to pass amnesty. So you are just wrong...ask jeb.....who also wants amnesty twit...

 

[owebo]

Assualt liberals and bomb throwing democrats.....

 

[Wilbur Right]

First of all, you have no clue what so-called "assault weapon" is, an ar15 is just a sporting rifle.

LMFAO. Hey sport, what is an assault weapon? Post a pretty picture of your favorite assault weapon.

From what I can tell, you fucking gun nutters have no idea what an assault weapon is.

The AR 15 is a gun nutters wannabe assault weapon. You can dress it up to look like an M16. You can bump stock it for all most full auto. It's fires the same round.

And the reason you love that gun is because you can't wAlk into a gun store and buy an M16.

How about the AK? Assault rifle? Fuck no.

 

[Wilbur Right]

No idiot I am not.

Good luck proving that. Even some of your fellow right wingers wonder about you.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

If we follow that same mindset, should the average American be ALSO able to purchase a bomb-carrying robot under the rationale that anything that law enforcement may have the average American is also entitled to have? .

They can't have an honest discussion about this. They'll parse words like a 45 year old hairdresser who keeps her Christmas lights up year round on the porch of her double-wide. The same way they lawyer the bible so Jesus approves of torture and hating others. It's who they are.

Its as simple as "Shall not be infringed". No parsing of words.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

First of all, you have no clue what so-called "assault weapon" is, an ar15 is just a sporting rifle.

LMFAO. Hey sport, what is an assault weapon? Post a pretty picture of your favorite assault weapon.

From what I can tell, you fucking gun nutters have no idea what an assault weapon is.

The AR 15 is a gun nutters wannabe assault weapon. You can dress it up to look like an M16. You can bump stock it for all most full auto. It's fires the same round.

And the reason you love that gun is because you can't wAlk into a gun store and buy an M16.

How about the AK? Assault rifle? Fuck no.

I spent 6 years in the military. Would you like to try and tell me I have no idea what an "assault rifle" is. I've fired everything from an 9mm to heavy machine guns. An AR-15 is not a military weapon. By the way yes you can buy an M16 if you can waste the time and money it takes to get a license for one. You are the one who doesn't know what your talking about.

 

[Brain357]

Define the word assault slut.

here, moron....some definition for you to take apart and show how macho you are:

An assault weapon is semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that can be changed in 2 seconds in case Bambi decides to shoot back at you........Satisfied???? LOL

A selectable fire weapon would be considered an "Assault Weapon" . What you just described encompasses several styles of hunting rifles and handguns none of which are selectable fire. You need to stop listening to the "limp-dicks" and start getting your information from people who know.

Well we know a semi auto rifle with detachable clip can kill 49 and injure over 50 in minutes. It can also kill and injure many police in a single shootout. Call it what you will, it is a mass killing weapon.

Car crashes can kill dozens, bombs hundreds, box cutters and airplanes killed thousands.

Cars are for transportation.
Bombs are illegal.
We have much better airport security now.

So why would you legally sell weapons for mass killing?

 

[DarkFury]

First of all, you have no clue what so-called "assault weapon" is, an ar15 is just a sporting rifle.

LMFAO. Hey sport, what is an assault weapon? Post a pretty picture of your favorite assault weapon.

From what I can tell, you fucking gun nutters have no idea what an assault weapon is.

The AR 15 is a gun nutters wannabe assault weapon. You can dress it up to look like an M16. You can bump stock it for all most full auto. It's fires the same round.

And the reason you love that gun is because you can't wAlk into a gun store and buy an M16.

How about the AK? Assault rifle? Fuck no.

NEW - Colt M16 LMG - David Spiwak

If you have the money {34k} and an F3 you CAN buy one online.

 

[Brain357]

You really do not know anything about weapons

We rely on you limp-dick-heads for all the weapon "knowledge" anyone one needs to know.....LOL.

Trouble is, you idiots don't listen.

TX and FL listen to the gun nuts. Now FL owns the worst mass shooting in US history. TX owns the worst mass shooting of police.

 

[DarkFury]

You really do not know anything about weapons

We rely on you limp-dick-heads for all the weapon "knowledge" anyone one needs to know.....LOL.

Trouble is, you idiots don't listen.

TX and FL listen to the gun nuts. Now FL owns the worst mass shooting in US history. TX owns the worst mass shooting of police.

The worst mass shooting in Texas belongs to Whitman armed with a bolt action.

 

[Brain357]

Define the word assault slut.

here, moron....some definition for you to take apart and show how macho you are:

An assault weapon is semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that can be changed in 2 seconds in case Bambi decides to shoot back at you........Satisfied???? LOL

A selectable fire weapon would be considered an "Assault Weapon" . What you just described encompasses several styles of hunting rifles and handguns none of which are selectable fire. You need to stop listening to the "limp-dicks" and start getting your information from people who know.

Well we know a semi auto rifle with detachable clip can kill 49 and injure over 50 in minutes. It can also kill and injure many police in a single shootout. Call it what you will, it is a mass killing weapon.

The shooter was in the Pulse for nearly three hours. ALL of these weapons are "semi-automatic", meaning that when you pull the trigger, another shell goes into position to be fired with the next pull of the trigger. That is what your talking about is it not?

Yes and almost all the 3 hours was a hostage situation. Most the killing was in 2 minutes with armed security trying to stop him.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

Until you can provide a definition of "assault rifle" and how it differs from a "non-assault" rifle, any discussion will remain at the level of barroom academics.

Are you that ill-informed? Really?

See? You can't do it.

 

[Brain357]

You really do not know anything about weapons

We rely on you limp-dick-heads for all the weapon "knowledge" anyone one needs to know.....LOL.

Trouble is, you idiots don't listen.

TX and FL listen to the gun nuts. Now FL owns the worst mass shooting in US history. TX owns the worst mass shooting of police.

The worst mass shooting in Texas belongs to Whitman armed with a bolt action.

Imagine how much worse it would have been with a semi auto.

 

[Brain357]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

Until you can provide a definition of "assault rifle" and how it differs from a "non-assault" rifle, any discussion will remain at the level of barroom academics.

Are you that ill-informed? Really?

See? You can't do it.

So many dead and the right argues definitions. Sad.

 

[DarkFury]

You really do not know anything about weapons

We rely on you limp-dick-heads for all the weapon "knowledge" anyone one needs to know.....LOL.

Trouble is, you idiots don't listen.

TX and FL listen to the gun nuts. Now FL owns the worst mass shooting in US history. TX owns the worst mass shooting of police.

The worst mass shooting in Texas belongs to Whitman armed with a bolt action.

Imagine how much worse it would have been with a semi auto.

And you are wrong about the mass killing of cops as well, that goes to New York. You are all mouth and no brain.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

Until you can provide a definition of "assault rifle" and how it differs from a "non-assault" rifle, any discussion will remain at the level of barroom academics.

Are you that ill-informed? Really?

See? You can't do it.

So many dead and the right argues definitions. Sad.

Definitions are what keeps us civilized.

 

[Brain357]

We rely on you limp-dick-heads for all the weapon "knowledge" anyone one needs to know.....LOL.

Trouble is, you idiots don't listen.

TX and FL listen to the gun nuts. Now FL owns the worst mass shooting in US history. TX owns the worst mass shooting of police.

The worst mass shooting in Texas belongs to Whitman armed with a bolt action.

Imagine how much worse it would have been with a semi auto.

And you are wrong about the mass killing of cops as well, that goes to New York. You are all mouth and no brain.

Ah so Dallas was a good event then? Good guys with guns all over and after many dead and wounded they needed a robot and a bomb. I don't recall the NRA saying a good guy with a robot and a bomb stops bad guys with a gun.

You argue a gun isn't an assault rifle, yet it kills almost 50 and injured over 50 in one mass shooting. You say if only a good guy with a gun was there, there have been many good guys with guns there. You blame gun free zones. You guys have been selling BS.

 

[Brain357]

No decent American would object to the Dallas' SWAT using a robot with a bomb to blow to kingdom-come the bastard sniper.....good riddance to evil.

However, I have a question based on recent threads on this forum:

The right wing "rationale" against ANY ban of assault rifles being sold to virtually whomever wants one has been that IF the police have such an assault weapon, THEN the average American under the 2nd amendment must ALSO be able to purchase such a weapon.......

Until you can provide a definition of "assault rifle" and how it differs from a "non-assault" rifle, any discussion will remain at the level of barroom academics.

Are you that ill-informed? Really?

See? You can't do it.

So many dead and the right argues definitions. Sad.

Definitions are what keeps us civilized.

Yes Dallas and Orlando very civilized.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Until you can provide a definition of "assault rifle" and how it differs from a "non-assault" rifle, any discussion will remain at the level of barroom academics.

Are you that ill-informed? Really?

See? You can't do it.

So many dead and the right argues definitions. Sad.

Definitions are what keeps us civilized.

Yes Dallas and Orlando very civilized.

It is the Left that refuses to accept the definition of words.