Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How big is the house you live in? Does it really need to be that big?The ironic part of that picture is that ONE horse is pulling a car. It only requires about 12 hp to propel a car at 80 kph. What is the possible need for the huge vehicles with absurd horsepower, beyond childish ego?
Wrong. Acceleration.Money and choice.
Yes, childishness.Wrong. Acceleration.
According to you it’s any deduction that reduces taxable income.
You have no idea how wrong is the tree up which you are barking.How big is the house you live in? Does it really need to be that big?
Doesn’t matter. Unless you have no unnecessary possessions you shouldn’t be throwing stones.You have no idea how wrong is the tree up which you are barking.
What is the likely future of an ICE powered car with 200,000 miles on it? I think it's the junk yard. What's the difference? You think you can't strip an EV for parts? You think someone couldn't jury rig another battery in there?
Yes, according to you. Do you normally post links you disagree with?According to me? I don't recall saying that. I believe I've posted the sources which indicated that tax incentives are considered a form of indirect subsidy. I've cited my sources. Where are yours if it is so obvious?
I think every problem that EV’s create will be cavalierly dismissed by you with a wave of your hand until the uproar becomes loud enough for you to say you knew it all along.What is the likely future of an ICE powered car with 200,000 miles on it? I think it's the junk yard. What's the difference? You think you can't strip an EV for parts? You think someone couldn't jury rig another battery in there?
I've posted my sources.Yes, according to you. Do you normally post links you disagree with?
I think every problem that EV’s create will be cavalierly dismissed by you with a wave of your hand until the uproar becomes loud enough for you to say you knew it all along.
My source is the definition of subsidy.I've posted my sources.
You never do.
Enough said. Only one of us knows how to support their position. The other is you.
Back in the 70’s they were. Not so much now.We're waiting for you you lot to accept that tailpipe emissions are even a problem.
My source is the definition of subsidy.
What part of this don’t you understand?
Back in the 70’s they were. Not so much now.
Do you even googleFrom where? So far all I know for sure is it is from your imagination.
The part where you claim you have an education and yet you can't even support your own point.
LOL.
Smog. Particulates. Not CO2 which is a vital component of the carbon cycle.And why was it bad in the 70's? Remind me again.
And can you tell me why it isn't as much of a problem today? Was it the "free market" that fixed it all?