Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,721
- 5,115
- 265
Joe you are really a fucking fool and you do not grasp what logic means. The question was not whether problems exist the questions were about what cause them/ You cannot and have not showed how wealth inequality harms a soul. In order to prove that it does YOU have to show cause an affect and you massively failed to show any.
again, lack of access to health care, food, safety... this is what wealth inequality does. I mean, I could have a discussion with you about Maslow's Heirarchy of needs, but since you are kind of retarded, I doubt you'd understand the concept.
Once again some people are poor YES. But that is not CAUSED by other people having wealth. Most poverty is in fact self inflicted.
Of course it is.
What is wealth? Wealth is the measure of the value of all labor that is performed. 40% of the population controls less than 1% of the wealth. Meanwhile, 1% of the population controls 43% of the wealth, and the top 20% of the population controls 87% of the wealth... they most certainly did not perform that percentage of the labor.
The great depression ended long before the great society started you total retard. Not every suffered the same way during the great depression and most managed to get by and not go hungry.
Actually, my dad grew up during the great depression. He was all of 5'4" and weighed about 140 lbs soaking wet. Yes, the lack of food during that time period really did result in people who had stunted growth. (His father was taller and my brothers and I are all well over 5'11).
Again you are wrong and massively stupid. Wealthy inequality does NOT cause those things and you still fail massively to show that it does. Your claim that these thing are caused by inequality is meaningless since you are no expert and your word is not good enough. I have proven you are a coward, a racist, a liar and an uneducated fool on many threads and you know this,
You have to show cause and effect and you have not even tried. Maslow's hierarchy of needs certainly does not prove your point in any way nor is it viewed as some sort of law by any one of reasonable intelligence.