Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course it gives rights. It takes opinions and turns them into legal facts.
what the fuck are you talking about
--LOL
If your opinion is that you have the right to own guns, implicitly without fear of the law, you can do that if the government gives you that right,
via something like the 2nd Amendment.
Your opinion about gun rights becomes a fact thanks to the Government.
the government did not give me the right to own firearms
The government did, if you had any idea of what 'rights' mean in this context.
Pray tell... WHAT DOES the 'rights' mean, in this context? (The Reader should know that she'll have no means to show a distinction in context... I only asked as a means to belittle and berate the sub-human... for my own entertainment, toward being cruel and as a means to quell a minor sadistic streak...)
Trying to warp the D of I and the Constitution into custom made endorsements of a narrow conservative agenda,
very funny.
They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
Then you don't believe the Supreme Court has the right to strike down gun bans, or to declare Obamacare unconstitutional in any aspect?
I don't believe that Straw reasoning is sound reasoning. You can 'belieb dat!"
So then the right to slavery was a natural right - protected by the government - but were were told natural rights cannot be taken away?The Right of slaveholders to have their slaves returned to them was written in the Constitution.
Not a "Natural Right?"
Well, it literally is, as Slaves were property. And there is no question that where a right is recognized in writing that this in no way results in the right becoming anything else than natural.
But how cool would it be for you, IF it did?
Perhaps you should consider heading on back down to the "FIRE HOT!" discussion. Word is that you were doing great down there... .
What the hell does this even mean?
It means that you're an idiot, who is incapable of discussing anything beyond the most fundamental of human observations. But sadly, for you... given this demonstration you've just offered, even THAT may be beyond your intellectual grasp.
what the fuck are you talking about
--LOL
If your opinion is that you have the right to own guns, implicitly without fear of the law, you can do that if the government gives you that right,
via something like the 2nd Amendment.
Your opinion about gun rights becomes a fact thanks to the Government.
the government did not give me the right to own firearms
The government did, if you had any idea of what 'rights' mean in this context.
Pray tell... WHAT DOES the 'rights' mean, in this context? (The Reader should know that she'll have no means to show a distinction in context... I only asked as a means to belittle and berate the sub-human... for my own entertainment, toward being cruel and as a means to quell a minor sadistic streak...)
It means a right you can exercise without being lawfully punished for it.
No sane person in this conversation thinks we're talking about 'rights' being simply actions you can take, regardless of the consequences. That would make murder or robbery a right.
They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
HUH?
The Constitution does NOT grant THE PEOPLE authority. The People have all - 100% - of the rights except for those which were specifically granted to the government. None of the powers granted to the government allows them to prevent homosexuals from living together.
.
True...
God grants people authority.
That's sorta the whole point of 'rights'. They're the things God authorizes... which is why they're not separable from our beings and why we don't need another's permission, and why we can't exercise it to the detriment of the means of another to do the same... because they too are authorized by God to do so.
Trying to warp the D of I and the Constitution into custom made endorsements of a narrow conservative agenda,
very funny.
The Charter of American Principles is what the US Constitution is designed to represent, as it defines the governmental construct AROUND those Judea-Christian principles.
If your opinion is that you have the right to own guns, implicitly without fear of the law, you can do that if the government gives you that right,
via something like the 2nd Amendment.
Your opinion about gun rights becomes a fact thanks to the Government.
the government did not give me the right to own firearms
The government did, if you had any idea of what 'rights' mean in this context.
Pray tell... WHAT DOES the 'rights' mean, in this context? (The Reader should know that she'll have no means to show a distinction in context... I only asked as a means to belittle and berate the sub-human... for my own entertainment, toward being cruel and as a means to quell a minor sadistic streak...)
It means a right you can exercise without being lawfully punished for it.
No sane person in this conversation thinks we're talking about 'rights' being simply actions you can take, regardless of the consequences. That would make murder or robbery a right.
ROFLMNAO! Can I call 'em or WHAT?
As I promised, there is no distinction of context. A right remains in THAT context, what a right is in EVERY CONTEXT! That which one is entitled to do, on no less an authority than the Creator of the Universe itself.
Which, ALWAYS come with the RESPONSIBILITY, to NOT BE EXERCISED TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE MEANS OF ANOTHER TO EXERCISE THEIR OWN RIGHTS.
Article Six, Clause 2They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
Of course it gives rights. It takes opinions and turns them into legal facts.
what the fuck are you talking about
--LOL
If your opinion is that you have the right to own guns, implicitly without fear of the law, you can do that if the government gives you that right,
via something like the 2nd Amendment.
Your opinion about gun rights becomes a fact thanks to the Government.
the government did not give me the right to own firearms
The government did, if you had any idea of what 'rights' mean in this context.
Pray tell... WHAT DOES the 'rights' mean, in this context? (The Reader should know that she'll have no means to show a distinction in context... I only asked as a means to belittle and berate the sub-human... for my own entertainment, toward being cruel and as a means to quell a minor sadistic streak...)
You just told me the Supreme Court doesn't have the power of judicial review.
They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
Article Six, Clause 2They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
The simple analogy I get from your post is "maybe God gave us government". That may be true, but it doesn't change my contention that, absent government, rights are merely wishful thinking.You're like a Christian Scientist. If God wants to heal us, then God will do that. We shouldn't intervene by taking medicine and stuff. My answer to that is that maybe God did want to heal us ... by giving us doctors ... You don't get it, do you? Liberals never get simple analogies.
You just told me the Supreme Court doesn't have the power of judicial review.
Nope... I never said that.
Ya see scamp, such implies objectivity and sound reasoning.
We saw this week that a Supreme Court Justice has spoken publicly to her own subjective views, claiming that the subjective views of the pop-culture are, from her addled perspective, the determining factors in making such decisions... where the decision is to overturn MAJORITY LEGISLATURE FROM THE MAJORITY OF THE STATES PASSED BY THE MAJORITY OF THE LEGISLATORS, ELECTED BY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE.
There's no Constitutional Authority for THAT.
(The Reader should know that she will literally have NO MEANS to understand what I have said... because she is an imbecile... OKA: An Intellectually Less Fortunate.)
They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
You reject the authority of the Courts?
What you said was the Supreme Court had no constitutional authority to rule on same sex marriage,
You reject law and rulings you don't agree with...cause that's how you roll.They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
You reject the authority of the Courts?
I reject the authority of any body which seeks to impart subjective whimsy as law, overturning my right to govern myself and by extension my culture, through soundly reasoned, objective rules, regulations and standards.
And that includes the entirety of all local, state and federal governance who would seek to do so.
But that's only because I choose to BE an American. And that's how we roll.
Article Six, Clause 2They'll just reject the constitutional authority of the Courts.
Yes... we will. Because the constitution does not grant such authority. But you're invited to cite where it does. And when you fail to do so, rest assured that I will be here to recognize and accept your looming concession.
Nothing there which provides for the power to overturn objectively reasoned legislature, based upon the subjective whimsy of pop-culture.
Would ya care to try again?
