Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too bad for you the onus is not on me to prove you right when you canât do that yourself.So Marolo Alvarez is not one of the "leaders." Thanks for playin'.Who's Marolo Alvarez?Of course you canât.
And you have proof they didn't and can supply that link. From and interview with one of his classmates:
"Marolo Alvarez, an 11th grade student at Parkland, remembers students taunting Nikolas Cruz.
Speaking to reporters at a vigil last month for the shooting victims and reported in the TC Palm of the USA Today network, he said he wished he had said something earlier.
âI could have said something to administrators, that âHey this kid gets bullied a lot, please help him, please reach out to him.â I kind of regret not doing that,â said Mr. Alvarez."
It appears many did.
To longtime friend, school shooter Nikolas Cruz was lonely, volatile, ostracized
A parkland 11th grader.
Link?
And you also have links showing that the leaders were not themselves a part of the group(s) that bullied him. Be so kind.
He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.He would not have been able to easily obtain those weapons. What part of that donât you understand?Nope. Had that law already been on the books, Nikolas Cruz would not have been able to so easily purchase the weapons he used to shoot dozens of people.He isnât? He and his schoolmates were instrumental in getting Florida SB 7026 passed.
which will likely save Zero life's. A common sense set of car regulations (see post 154) would save more life's in a few weeks, then that law will save in a hundred years.
but that would make sense and satisfy the lefts logic on the subject.
He was not supposed to have been able to purchase a gun in the first place.
Commentary: Background Checks Alone Canât Stop a Mass ShooterâBut This Process Could
In this instance, Nikolas Cruzâwho the Broward County Sheriffâs Office says confessedto the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High Schoolâpassed a background check when he purchased his weapon from a gun store. That check would have been a simple, two-minute process in which the dealer placed a call to the FBI, which would have looked at whether Cruz had criminal background or mental health issues on record. Since nothing showed up, the sale went through.
Cruz had a history of troubling behaviorâincluding disputes with neighbors, picking fights with other kids, and animal abuseâthat frequently led to the police being called. Yet none of this showed up on his criminal record; a rap sheet is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the crimes an individual has been involved with.
What makes you think that non reporting will stop with another law? What makes you think that a monster won't simply steal a gun, or buy one from a street thug?
Nope, when you give a bullied child medication that turns them into monsters, pass all the damn laws you want, the monster will win.
I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?It's what he chose and had easy access to.And at 19, he still would not have been able to easily obtain the weapons he used to shoot dozens of people in 6 minutes had the legal age have been 21.God, trying to teach the dense is like, well, trying to teach the dense!
This young man had endured bullying for many years. A quote from one of his classmates:
"
Marolo Alvarez, an 11th grade student at Parkland, remembers students taunting Nikolas Cruz.
Speaking to reporters at a vigil last month for the shooting victims and reported in the TC Palm of the USA Today network, he said he wished he had said something earlier.
âI could have said something to administrators, that âHey this kid gets bullied a lot, please help him, please reach out to him.â I kind of regret not doing that,â said Mr. Alvarez."
He was also likely on an anti-depressant or prescription for ADHD, that is linked to nearly every school shooting since these drugs became available (Interesting not is that it was nearly the same time that these shootings started)
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
"Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids."
Do you, in all seriousness, think that a kid, that has been relentlessly bullied for years, who thinks that it will never end and he is destined to endure it forever, and one who has also had his developing brain dosed with the drugs outlined above, if he can't buy a gun, steal one? Or build a pressure cooker bomb, or simply find a 1 ton truck and likely kill even more?
Make some sense, OK?
Yet, as pointed out already, a gun was not his only, nor probably his most deadly option.
And taking a 1 ton truck and mowing down 30, 40 or 50 would have made you FEEL SOOOOOO much better.
Thanks for playing
He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.He would not have been able to easily obtain those weapons. What part of that donât you understand?Nope. Had that law already been on the books, Nikolas Cruz would not have been able to so easily purchase the weapons he used to shoot dozens of people.which will likely save Zero life's. A common sense set of car regulations (see post 154) would save more life's in a few weeks, then that law will save in a hundred years.
but that would make sense and satisfy the lefts logic on the subject.
He was not supposed to have been able to purchase a gun in the first place.
Commentary: Background Checks Alone Canât Stop a Mass ShooterâBut This Process Could
In this instance, Nikolas Cruzâwho the Broward County Sheriffâs Office says confessedto the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High Schoolâpassed a background check when he purchased his weapon from a gun store. That check would have been a simple, two-minute process in which the dealer placed a call to the FBI, which would have looked at whether Cruz had criminal background or mental health issues on record. Since nothing showed up, the sale went through.
Cruz had a history of troubling behaviorâincluding disputes with neighbors, picking fights with other kids, and animal abuseâthat frequently led to the police being called. Yet none of this showed up on his criminal record; a rap sheet is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the crimes an individual has been involved with.
What makes you think that non reporting will stop with another law? What makes you think that a monster won't simply steal a gun, or buy one from a street thug?
Nope, when you give a bullied child medication that turns them into monsters, pass all the damn laws you want, the monster will win.
I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
Too bad for you the onus is not on me to prove you right when you canât do that yourself.So Marolo Alvarez is not one of the "leaders." Thanks for playin'.Who's Marolo Alvarez?And you have proof they didn't and can supply that link. From and interview with one of his classmates:
"Marolo Alvarez, an 11th grade student at Parkland, remembers students taunting Nikolas Cruz.
Speaking to reporters at a vigil last month for the shooting victims and reported in the TC Palm of the USA Today network, he said he wished he had said something earlier.
âI could have said something to administrators, that âHey this kid gets bullied a lot, please help him, please reach out to him.â I kind of regret not doing that,â said Mr. Alvarez."
It appears many did.
To longtime friend, school shooter Nikolas Cruz was lonely, volatile, ostracized
A parkland 11th grader.
Link?
And you also have links showing that the leaders were not themselves a part of the group(s) that bullied him. Be so kind.
Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?It's what he chose and had easy access to.And at 19, he still would not have been able to easily obtain the weapons he used to shoot dozens of people in 6 minutes had the legal age have been 21.
Yet, as pointed out already, a gun was not his only, nor probably his most deadly option.
And taking a 1 ton truck and mowing down 30, 40 or 50 would have made you FEEL SOOOOOO much better.
Thanks for playing
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?It's what he chose and had easy access to.Yet, as pointed out already, a gun was not his only, nor probably his most deadly option.
And taking a 1 ton truck and mowing down 30, 40 or 50 would have made you FEEL SOOOOOO much better.
Thanks for playing
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?It's what he chose and had easy access to.
And taking a 1 ton truck and mowing down 30, 40 or 50 would have made you FEEL SOOOOOO much better.
Thanks for playing
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Neither method he chose to use. He chose guns which would not have been easily accessible if the legal age was 21.He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.He would not have been able to easily obtain those weapons. What part of that donât you understand?Nope. Had that law already been on the books, Nikolas Cruz would not have been able to so easily purchase the weapons he used to shoot dozens of people.
He was not supposed to have been able to purchase a gun in the first place.
Commentary: Background Checks Alone Canât Stop a Mass ShooterâBut This Process Could
In this instance, Nikolas Cruzâwho the Broward County Sheriffâs Office says confessedto the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High Schoolâpassed a background check when he purchased his weapon from a gun store. That check would have been a simple, two-minute process in which the dealer placed a call to the FBI, which would have looked at whether Cruz had criminal background or mental health issues on record. Since nothing showed up, the sale went through.
Cruz had a history of troubling behaviorâincluding disputes with neighbors, picking fights with other kids, and animal abuseâthat frequently led to the police being called. Yet none of this showed up on his criminal record; a rap sheet is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the crimes an individual has been involved with.
What makes you think that non reporting will stop with another law? What makes you think that a monster won't simply steal a gun, or buy one from a street thug?
Nope, when you give a bullied child medication that turns them into monsters, pass all the damn laws you want, the monster will win.
I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
No RED FLAGS! The laws in Florida made it very possible for RED FLAGS to have been placed on him. Gee golly Ms. Molly, guess laws ain't always followed.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs or driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd.
Neither method he chose to use. He chose guns which would not have been easily accessible if the legal age was 21.He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.He would not have been able to easily obtain those weapons. What part of that donât you understand?He was not supposed to have been able to purchase a gun in the first place.
Commentary: Background Checks Alone Canât Stop a Mass ShooterâBut This Process Could
What makes you think that non reporting will stop with another law? What makes you think that a monster won't simply steal a gun, or buy one from a street thug?
Nope, when you give a bullied child medication that turns them into monsters, pass all the damn laws you want, the monster will win.
I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
No RED FLAGS! The laws in Florida made it very possible for RED FLAGS to have been placed on him. Gee golly Ms. Molly, guess laws ain't always followed.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs or driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd.
Moron... you just asked me if I have links to prove the âleadersâ were not in on the bullying. Prove that yourself.Too bad for you the onus is not on me to prove you right when you canât do that yourself.So Marolo Alvarez is not one of the "leaders." Thanks for playin'.Who's Marolo Alvarez?
To longtime friend, school shooter Nikolas Cruz was lonely, volatile, ostracized
A parkland 11th grader.
Link?
And you also have links showing that the leaders were not themselves a part of the group(s) that bullied him. Be so kind.
Prove what genius. In the post you reference I already state that I cant substantiate it.
Want to try again?
Moron... you just asked me if I have links to prove the âleadersâ were not in on the bullying. Prove that yourself.Too bad for you the onus is not on me to prove you right when you canât do that yourself.So Marolo Alvarez is not one of the "leaders." Thanks for playin'.To longtime friend, school shooter Nikolas Cruz was lonely, volatile, ostracized
A parkland 11th grader.
Link?
And you also have links showing that the leaders were not themselves a part of the group(s) that bullied him. Be so kind.
Prove what genius. In the post you reference I already state that I cant substantiate it.
Want to try again?
Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?And taking a 1 ton truck and mowing down 30, 40 or 50 would have made you FEEL SOOOOOO much better.
Thanks for playing
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Your deflection is noted and dismissed. You really want to compare the annual number of murders by vehicles versus the number of murders by guns?
Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
Nothing but speculation on your part. We know what he did. Weâll never know what he would have done had he not been able to easily obtain a gun.Neither method he chose to use. He chose guns which would not have been easily accessible if the legal age was 21.He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.He would not have been able to easily obtain those weapons. What part of that donât you understand?
I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
No RED FLAGS! The laws in Florida made it very possible for RED FLAGS to have been placed on him. Gee golly Ms. Molly, guess laws ain't always followed.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs or driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs, driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd OR stealing a gun OR buying a gun from a gangsta.
You run with the idea that a new law will stop a Murderer from his goal of Murder, we will all sit back and laugh at the absurdity of it.
Gee Gosh Faun, looks like murderers will murder no matter what laws are in place:
Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
From the link:
"The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
And This:
The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
Well, they didn't have easy access to guns at all, and crime increased?
Hmmmmm, wonder if it did cuz the criminals didn't have to worry that their victims were armed?
Thanks for playing
âFact??â Prove he would have used a pipe bomb or a truck had he not been able to so easily get a gun.....Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?Classic deflection on your part. The question was never about annual numbers (and you knew that), but about method.
But if you want to talk about "annual numbers" lets do just that. How about why school shootings are way up since children have been prescribed antidepressants?
From: Antidepressants Are a Prescription for Mass Shootings â Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR
Psychiatrists generally will tell you that these people were mentally ill and they werenât treated in time or didnât get enough help to prevent the tragedy. However, Dr. Peter Breggin, who is a psychiatrist, stated that depression rarely leads to violence and that itâs only since the SSRIâs came on the market that such mass shootings have taken place.
In a study of thirty-one drugs that are disproportionately linked to reports of violence toward others, five of the top ten are antidepressants. These are Prozac, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor and Pristiq. Two other drugs that are for treating ADHD are also in the top ten which means these are being given to children who could then become violent. One could conclude from this study alone that antidepressants cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. This is a prescription for mass shootings.
No one can talk their way out of explaining how a person who is previously non-violent and given antidepressants suddenly becomes violent or suicidal. There are multiple cases of children who have committed suicide days after starting to take an antidepressant. In a YouTube video, various parents tell their story about what the antidepressants did to their kids.
See, that wasn't so hard, now was it lil fella
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
No, I've been quite good at backing up my statements with facts.
like this one in regards to methods Murderers use:
"The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
Source: Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
You on the other hand are just an annoying little bitch.
OHHHHHHHH, here's your answer. But it would have been harder to get a gun.
Nothing but speculation on your part. We know what he did. Weâll never know what he would have done had he not been able to easily obtain a gun.Neither method he chose to use. He chose guns which would not have been easily accessible if the legal age was 21.He was sold a gun because there were no red flags against him. He will not have been sold a gun at the legalese been 21.I posted earlier about the law that would have made him unable to get a gun in the first place. You ignored that of course.
No RED FLAGS! The laws in Florida made it very possible for RED FLAGS to have been placed on him. Gee golly Ms. Molly, guess laws ain't always followed.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs or driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd.
And none of that stops a Monster from building pipe bombs, driving a 1 ton truck into a crowd OR stealing a gun OR buying a gun from a gangsta.
You run with the idea that a new law will stop a Murderer from his goal of Murder, we will all sit back and laugh at the absurdity of it.
Gee Gosh Faun, looks like murderers will murder no matter what laws are in place:
Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
From the link:
"The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
And This:
The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
Well, they didn't have easy access to guns at all, and crime increased?
Hmmmmm, wonder if it did cuz the criminals didn't have to worry that their victims were armed?
Thanks for playing
âFact??â Prove he would have used a pipe bomb or a truck had he not been able to so easily get a gun.....Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Of course itâs about annual numbers. What do you think the Parklands kids are fighting to reduce?
And antidepressants would not have enabled Cruz to get a gun at 19 if the legal age was 21.
Thanks again for playinâ.
You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
No, I've been quite good at backing up my statements with facts.
like this one in regards to methods Murderers use:
"The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
Source: Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
You on the other hand are just an annoying little bitch.
OHHHHHHHH, here's your answer. But it would have been harder to get a gun.
Again, there is no burden on me to prove you right because you canât do that yourself.âFact??â Prove he would have used a pipe bomb or a truck had he not been able to so easily get a gun.....Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.You drunk. or just obtuse.
Your deflecting is boring.
No, I've been quite good at backing up my statements with facts.
like this one in regards to methods Murderers use:
"The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
Source: Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
You on the other hand are just an annoying little bitch.
OHHHHHHHH, here's your answer. But it would have been harder to get a gun.
You are an annoying twerp.
Prove he wouldn't
Again, there is no burden on me to prove you right because you canât do that yourself.âFact??â Prove he would have used a pipe bomb or a truck had he not been able to so easily get a gun.....Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Your deflecting is boring.Soâs your squawking like a parrot. I point out youâre deflecting, so now you squawk that back at me. I say to you, âthanks for playing,â then you squawk that back at me. Try using your own brain.Your deflecting is boring.
No, I've been quite good at backing up my statements with facts.
like this one in regards to methods Murderers use:
"The rise in crime is accelerating, with the latest figures showing a 13% increase in all police-recorded offences across England and Wales, and even greater rises for violent offences including knife crime, sexual offences and violence against the person.
The crime figures show an underlying 8% rise in the murder rate, an increase of 46 victims, with 629 homicides recorded in the 12 months to June, excluding the 35 people killed in the London and Manchester terrorist attacks, and the 96 Hillsborough deaths in 1989, which were included in the headline figures."
Source: Police data shows crime rising at increasing rate in England and Wales
You on the other hand are just an annoying little bitch.
OHHHHHHHH, here's your answer. But it would have been harder to get a gun.
You are an annoying twerp.
Prove he wouldn't
And again, thanks for playinâ.
