Does The Status Of The Clinton's Marriage Deserve Scrutiny

Is there really any doubt the Hillary wasn't aware of what was going on and joined in on the multiple crucifictions of Bill's victims. I ponder the "NOW" and Democratic Party reaction, suddenly sexual harassment, rape and a submissive female was a fully acceptable arrangement....:lmao:
 
Last edited:
That ancient history shit will only play to the social conservatives, everyone else will think republicans have nothing to run on and precious little to run against.
 
As long as the people I work with do their job and can do their job well, I don't care what they do privately. Now, if their private life became public in such a way as to be a distraction to the job, that's a problem.....not because I might have moral objection to their actions, but because I want their job to be accomplished well.

I can't do background checks on people I work with, but I and my co-workers have all had to have them done. I work with children.

You can do a background check on almost anyone with some basic information. I work in a position where we are all required to pass a security check every year and I still do checks on everyone I work directly with. I have no interest in even being around people with no morals or values.

I turned down a 6 figure job opportunity because it meant being trained by a woman, something I find totally immoral.

Oh, ok.

I didn't realize that you went far beyond garden-variety rightwing nutjob.

Carry on.
 

It was a supervisor position. I would have spent 4 months as her assistant then taken her job. Since I will not work for a woman ir be trained in a job duty by one I turned it down. She shouldn't have been in that job to begin with.
 
Putting extremist views aside, there are a lot of average people who wouldn't look down upon the unwed teacher who has a child and/or gets divorced, yet still expect a certain standard from elected officials who have all of their personal information on display. Elevating all civil servants to the level of the President, and expecting them to be judged equally, is not how most people view them.

The President is human, like it or not.

Like it or not, they will be judged by most people.
Putting extremist views aside, there are a lot of average people who wouldn't look down upon the unwed teacher who has a child and/or gets divorced, yet still expect a certain standard from elected officials who have all of their personal information on display. Elevating all civil servants to the level of the President, and expecting them to be judged equally, is not how most people view them.

The President is human, like it or not.

Like it or not, they will be judged by most people.

Exactly. Which is why I couldn't, in all good conscience, support the nomination of someone like Hillary Clinton that has literally tons of baggage.

Because I'm not the only one doing the "hiring."
 

It was a supervisor position. I would have spent 4 months as her assistant then taken her job. Since I will not work for a woman ir be trained in a job duty by one I turned it down. She shouldn't have been in that job to begin with.

Don't look at my profile...you certainly wouldn't approve of my position.:D
 
Let's just forget about the Clintons....two pigs from the era when piggery became popular in these here United States.
 
As long as the people I work with do their job and can do their job well, I don't care what they do privately. Now, if their private life became public in such a way as to be a distraction to the job, that's a problem.....not because I might have moral objection to their actions, but because I want their job to be accomplished well.

I can't do background checks on people I work with, but I and my co-workers have all had to have them done. I work with children.

You can do a background check on almost anyone with some basic information. I work in a position where we are all required to pass a security check every year and I still do checks on everyone I work directly with. I have no interest in even being around people with no morals or values.

I turned down a 6 figure job opportunity because it meant being trained by a woman, something I find totally immoral.
That depends on what she was training you to do...coulda been fun.
 
That depends on what she was training you to do...coulda been fun.

I work in Engineering Services not porn.

I don't think anyone would have thought otherwise.

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

He looked at my profile info and does not approve of my career choice.:whip:

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

Flaunting her inappropriate and immoral professional position.

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

Flaunting her inappropriate and immoral professional position.

:rofl:

Forgive me, I don't usually think of myself as naive, but......is "training manager" some kind of euphemism for something else?

????????????
 
That depends on what she was training you to do...coulda been fun.

I work in Engineering Services not porn.

I don't think anyone would have thought otherwise.

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

He looked at my profile info and does not approve of my career choice.:whip:

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

Flaunting her inappropriate and immoral professional position.

Why did you put Sherry on ignore?

Flaunting her inappropriate and immoral professional position.

:rofl:

Forgive me, I don't usually think of myself as naive, but......is "training manager" some kind of euphemism for something else?

????????????

Maybe in Grumpy's world.:dunno: I'm not familiar with him as a poster, but apparently women should know their place, and it's never in a position of authority over a man...back in the day he probably demanded to only have sex in the missionary position.:D
 
Never mind lying and perjury.

Geeezus.

Lying about a question he never should have been asked. 67% of folks at the time thought it was fine.

They weren't keen on Ken Starr's 70 million dollar panty-sniffing raid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top