j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
- Oct 8, 2013
- 22,302
- 14,571
“Every attorney”. That’s false and you know it. Stop making things up.Of course it matters. If he finds nothing, DJT looks very bad. What are you talking about. He said to speak with Barr on an open phone call. "Corrupt intent"? LOL
You're crazy. He had credible info. This is 100% subjective. You cannot possibly prove his intent.
Ha! DJT will look bad to who exactly? His cult members. No. If they find nothing, it’ll just be the cult complaining of a corrupt judicial process just like they did for Clinton. Facts make little difference. The damage is done.
He never spoke to Barr. There goes the cover story.
You can prove intent. Happens all the time. You can’t prove intent to the cult members, though. You can’t prove anything to them.
Who’s the credible information? Shokin? Not credible. Wouldn’t stand up a second in court. That’s why the DoJ is steering clear.
Prove his intent then:
#1) Did he want Biden investigated because of what happened in 2016.
#2) Did he want Biden investigated because he was worried about 2020.
Even the best attorneys will tell you it is nearly impossible to prove intent. You an attorney and a doctor now? There is zero chance the Senate convicts. You admitted as such. Youre just posturing now. Little Leftist Troll.
Intent is proven in court all the time. Did you not know this?
"all the time"...no most cases do not see the court room because it cannot be proven. Every attorney has stated that in a court of law this would not get past the fist round of questioning. Same with Kavanaugh. I gave you options 1 and 2. How do you know which it is? #2 means he should be impeached but #1 means he cannot be. How would you decipher?
You have to prove intent for a lot of cases. Don’t make it sound like it’s something that is “almost impossible”. If Trump wanted Biden investigated, why didn’t he want the DoJ involved?
Now you are making shit up...If he didn't want the DoJ involved then why did he tell Z to get with Barr?