Well when 80% of the rich vote and 80% of the poor don't, yes, it seems liberty is only important to the rich.Yes and you are ignorant to all the liberal policies and programs that you benefitted along the way. If America looked the way you dream it would have a small ruling class. Lets call them the Trumps of the world. Then you would have the small middle class and your way would produce an economy where the vast majority are working poor.About 57 percent of eligible voters cast ballots this year, down from 58.6 percent in 2012 and 61.6 percent in 2008, which was the highest mark in 40 years.
Who didn't vote? It was the poor, the young, women, hispanics, blacks and arabs. Yes they are all going to be the losers now the Republicans won. Lucky for me I'm none of these things.
So my brother asks me, "then why do you care?" and that's a great question. I don't anymore.
You care because you're greedy, self centered and consumed with wealth envy, just like every other liberal
But hey, if that's what freedom produces so be it right? Winner take all, survival of the fittest, dog eat dog, every man for himself. That's free unfettered unregulated capitalism. In fact I'll provide the absolute cheapest abortions and let the market decide if abortions stay or go. If women don't want them they won't get them, right?
Yeah, liberty is only important to the rich. Blah blah. Bullshit
Oh the poor want a share of the pie but they are too lazy to even bother showing up to vote every 2 or 4 years. If they are bad citizens fuck what they want.
And that ... is why you're a Marxist. The poor don't know what's good for themselves, so you'll decide and do it for them
Conservatives believe what business does is business's business, and government should keep its nose out of it, even when it leads to centuries of Tiny Tims and terrified-of-job-loss employees. As the Wall Street Journal noted in 1997, Alan Greenspan sees one of his main jobs as being to maintain a high enough level of "worker insecurity" that employees won't demand pay raises and benefits increases, thus provoking "wage inflation." ("CEO inflation" is fine with the cons.)