If Russia and China invaded California or Texas...

Would you fight for California and Texas if a powerful enemy invaded either one?


  • Total voters
    52
I would defend this country with everything I have. I will kill or be killed if there were some other country invading and it matters not where they invade.
 
Would you support Obama and the military in fucking them up?

Or if we reversed time and Bush was still President?

I don't think they would need much input. I think 95% of Americans would be behind the government and military (wouldn't matter who was President) if the mainland was attacked by China, Russia or anyone other than Mexico.

If Mexico attacks (and one day they just might), like think the Hispanic population will have a choice to make. White, Asian and Black Americans will be in the 90% category, but I don't know how many Latino would be.
 
We had an attack on US soil on 9/11/01. How many of you liberals supported going after those who attacked us? I am not asking if you supported going into Iraq and Afghanistan, because I do not support either. Would you support covert CIA action to eliminate the individuals who orchestrated the attack wherever and whoever they are?


to the OP. The people of Texas would individually defend their state against any attack, those of us in neighboring states would help them.

an attack on California would sadly be different, they would want to know if the attackers supported gay marriage and global warming, if they said yes they would welcome them to the campfire and spend the night ranting about Bush and the evil conservatives. Then in the morning the attackers would kill the californians, and take over the state.

liberalism is a mental disease.
 
Would you support Obama and the military in fucking them up?

Or if we reversed time and Bush was still President?

I don't think they would need much input. I think 95% of Americans would be behind the government and military (wouldn't matter who was President) if the mainland was attacked by China, Russia or anyone other than Mexico.

If Mexico attacks (and one day they just might), like think the Hispanic population will have a choice to make. White, Asian and Black Americans will be in the 90% category, but I don't know how many Latino would be.

you think Mex will attack?

hyperbole or are you serious
 
I think everyone would do what they could to fuck them up.

You have all 4 branches of military, off duty soldiers, vetrans, and all 50 state National Guard divisions.
Then lets not forget the NRA and civilian militias. With those two, you can see guerrilla tactics such as kamikaze carbombs (since they will invest in remote control stuff)
 
We had an attack on US soil on 9/11/01. How many of you liberals supported going after those who attacked us? I am not asking if you supported going into Iraq and Afghanistan, because I do not support either. Would you support covert CIA action to eliminate the individuals who orchestrated the attack wherever and whoever they are?


to the OP. The people of Texas would individually defend their state against any attack, those of us in neighboring states would help them.

an attack on California would sadly be different, they would want to know if the attackers supported gay marriage and global warming, if they said yes they would welcome them to the campfire and spend the night ranting about Bush and the evil conservatives. Then in the morning the attackers would kill the californians, and take over the state.

liberalism is a mental disease.

I was living in NYC at that time and working in NJ.
I can't tell about the message board leftards but the ones in the real life ALL were supporting going "after them". Some even admitted that they were happy it was Bush as a President, not Gore, because, verbatim "in the cases of a grave danger to our country Republicans are more reliable Presidents than Dems are". And they voted for Gore and were upset at court ruling initially.
 
We had an attack on US soil on 9/11/01. How many of you liberals supported going after those who attacked us? I am not asking if you supported going into Iraq and Afghanistan, because I do not support either. Would you support covert CIA action to eliminate the individuals who orchestrated the attack wherever and whoever they are?


to the OP. The people of Texas would individually defend their state against any attack, those of us in neighboring states would help them.

an attack on California would sadly be different, they would want to know if the attackers supported gay marriage and global warming, if they said yes they would welcome them to the campfire and spend the night ranting about Bush and the evil conservatives. Then in the morning the attackers would kill the californians, and take over the state.

liberalism is a mental disease.

I was living in NYC at that time and working in NJ.
I can't tell about the message board leftards but the ones in the real life ALL were supporting going "after them". Some even admitted that they were happy it was Bush as a President, not Gore, because, verbatim "in the cases of a grave danger to our country Republicans are more reliable Presidents than Dems are". And they voted for Gore and were upset at court ruling initially.

funny how liberals gain common sense when they find themselves in danger.

but fear not, Gore could have given Al Qaeda some free carbon credits if they promised not to do it again.:cool:
 
First of all, Obama wouldn't fight. He would try to make a deal with them to stay in office and represent the invading force. Second, every chicken shit liberal in the country would follow along right behind him, the way they do now. The only ones who would fight would be the REAL Americans, the ones that value their freedom and independence. That leaves out every liberal parasite in this country.

Conservatives, libertarians, and independents would wage a guerilla war against the Chinese or Russians (whoever) and the sniveling liberals would be the informants, snitching on them to curry favor with the invaders. They're boot lickers right now for Obama, why would anyone think they would suddenly grow balls if somebody ELSE came in and took our freedom away?
 
We had an attack on US soil on 9/11/01. How many of you liberals supported going after those who attacked us? I am not asking if you supported going into Iraq and Afghanistan, because I do not support either. Would you support covert CIA action to eliminate the individuals who orchestrated the attack wherever and whoever they are?


to the OP. The people of Texas would individually defend their state against any attack, those of us in neighboring states would help them.

an attack on California would sadly be different, they would want to know if the attackers supported gay marriage and global warming, if they said yes they would welcome them to the campfire and spend the night ranting about Bush and the evil conservatives. Then in the morning the attackers would kill the californians, and take over the state.

liberalism is a mental disease.

I was living in NYC at that time and working in NJ.
I can't tell about the message board leftards but the ones in the real life ALL were supporting going "after them". Some even admitted that they were happy it was Bush as a President, not Gore, because, verbatim "in the cases of a grave danger to our country Republicans are more reliable Presidents than Dems are". And they voted for Gore and were upset at court ruling initially.

funny how liberals gain common sense when they find themselves in danger.

but fear not, Gore could have given Al Qaeda some free carbon credits if they promised not to do it again.:cool:

Gore would not have exploited 9-11 hysteria to invade Iraq
 
Texas has had six flags fly over in in it's history. And it's just as American as your shit hole of a state.

No, we fought for our nations freedom
Texas took up arms against our nation

When I drive around NJ, I see us proudly flying the stars and stripes....just like all loyal Americans

When I drive through Texas, I see the stars and stripes replaced with the lone star flag or the confederate flag

Texas fought against the USA? I have to see some proof of that.

Yea, we had a little tussle we like to call the Civil War. It is in all he history books but I am not sure it is in the ones they print in Texas
Anyway, we kicked their asses and they begged to com back into the union
 
First of all, Obama wouldn't fight. He would try to make a deal with them to stay in office and represent the invading force. Second, every chicken shit liberal in the country would follow along right behind him, the way they do now. The only ones who would fight would be the REAL Americans, the ones that value their freedom and independence. That leaves out every liberal parasite in this country.

Conservatives, libertarians, and independents would wage a guerilla war against the Chinese or Russians (whoever) and the sniveling liberals would be the informants, snitching on them to curry favor with the invaders. They're boot lickers right now for Obama, why would anyone think they would suddenly grow balls if somebody ELSE came in and took our freedom away?


Calm down. First of all, there would be no need for a guerrilla war because the US military would crush any such invasion in very short order. Second, most democrats would also stand up and fight if the homeland were being directly invaded. Don't let partisanship make a fool of you. Only the most ridiculously extreme on either the left or the right (and yes we have some such assholes here, unfortunately) would refuse to defend the homeland out of partisan spite. The nonsense that gets posted here is just that - nonsense. If push came to shove, the word games and banter would be put on hold and the vast majority of able-bodied American men - and women - would take up arms, or a knife, a bat, a pointy stick, or just their bare hands and show the visitors what a warlike people is REALLY like.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vox
I am not talking about Americans

I am talking about Texans



Fuck you, you are NOT an American yourself. NJ should throw you out into the Atlantic with the rest of the trash. You don't belong in any part of The United States of America.

Myself, and all citizens of NJ are proud to call ourselves Americans.



I'm not talking about anyone else in Jersey, asshole, I'm talking about YOU. YOU can call yourself whatever you want, but your words here prove that you are NOT an American. Stop being a douchebag.
 
No, we fought for our nations freedom
Texas took up arms against our nation

When I drive around NJ, I see us proudly flying the stars and stripes....just like all loyal Americans

When I drive through Texas, I see the stars and stripes replaced with the lone star flag or the confederate flag

Texas fought against the USA? I have to see some proof of that.

Yea, we had a little tussle we like to call the Civil War. It is in all he history books but I am not sure it is in the ones they print in Texas
Anyway, we kicked their asses and they begged to com back into the union

Oh now your just being stupid. Which comes rather easy to you.
 
Fuck you, you are NOT an American yourself. NJ should throw you out into the Atlantic with the rest of the trash. You don't belong in any part of The United States of America.

Myself, and all citizens of NJ are proud to call ourselves Americans. We fly our flag proudly and our flag is the Stars and Stripes

Not the Lone Star flag or Confederate flag that they fly in Texas

LOL, you live in that shit state? WOW, that is funny. What a dire shit hole. The fact is I don't even feel sorry for you. I'm glad you live in that dump. This is the best shit I've read all day. Been to Camden lately Mr. 6 figures? ROFLMAO. The only gardens in that cesspool you call a state are probably on top of dead bodies. What a useless pile of shit you live in.

Hey, fuck you too asshole. You have now proven that you are as un-American as he is.
 
I was living in NYC at that time and working in NJ.
I can't tell about the message board leftards but the ones in the real life ALL were supporting going "after them". Some even admitted that they were happy it was Bush as a President, not Gore, because, verbatim "in the cases of a grave danger to our country Republicans are more reliable Presidents than Dems are". And they voted for Gore and were upset at court ruling initially.

funny how liberals gain common sense when they find themselves in danger.

but fear not, Gore could have given Al Qaeda some free carbon credits if they promised not to do it again.:cool:

Gore would not have exploited 9-11 hysteria to invade Iraq

gore would have been a disaster altogether.
but he could have been invading iraq nevertheless - given the knowledge we have had then.

your dove obama is jumping off his pants to invade Syria, even though everybody reasonable opposes that. After 9/11 everybody was supporting elimination of the "bad guys", because the knowledge of non-existence of the "good guys" there was yet to be obtained.
 
funny how liberals gain common sense when they find themselves in danger.

but fear not, Gore could have given Al Qaeda some free carbon credits if they promised not to do it again.:cool:

Gore would not have exploited 9-11 hysteria to invade Iraq

gore would have been a disaster altogether.
but he could have been invading iraq nevertheless - given the knowledge we have had then.

your dove obama is jumping off his pants to invade Syria, even though everybody reasonable opposes that. After 9/11 everybody was supporting elimination of the "bad guys", because the knowledge of non-existence of the "good guys" there was yet to be obtained.

There is only one president who would have blundered into Iraq and that is W. Even his father was smart enough not to drag us into that shithole
 
Gore would not have exploited 9-11 hysteria to invade Iraq

gore would have been a disaster altogether.
but he could have been invading iraq nevertheless - given the knowledge we have had then.

your dove obama is jumping off his pants to invade Syria, even though everybody reasonable opposes that. After 9/11 everybody was supporting elimination of the "bad guys", because the knowledge of non-existence of the "good guys" there was yet to be obtained.

There is only one president who would have blundered into Iraq and that is W. Even his father was smart enough not to drag us into that shithole

Nope. you can not say "only one" because you will never know.
not that I hold Iraq against W that much - in the meaning of starting it.
what I hold against ( mildly) is the manner it was first conducted - not as a war, but as an appeasing campaign.

If you get yourself involved in the war - your main goal is to win, no matter what, not to appease.
 
Last edited:
gore would have been a disaster altogether.
but he could have been invading iraq nevertheless - given the knowledge we have had then.

your dove obama is jumping off his pants to invade Syria, even though everybody reasonable opposes that. After 9/11 everybody was supporting elimination of the "bad guys", because the knowledge of non-existence of the "good guys" there was yet to be obtained.

There is only one president who would have blundered into Iraq and that is W. Even his father was smart enough not to drag us into that shithole

Nope. you can not say "only one" because you will never know.
not that I hold Iraq against W that much - in the meaning of starting it.
what I hold against ( mildly) is the manner it was first conducted - not as a war, but as an appeasing campaign.

If you get yourself involved in the war - your main goal is to win, no matter what, not to appease.

Bush blundered when:

He diverted the war on terror to invade Iraq
Lied about his reasons
Made a half assed occupation because he didn't want to make it seem like a big deal
Engaged in torture
Failed to build an effective coalition
 

Forum List

Back
Top