Jodi Arias Penalty

6/17/2013*
OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001)*
6/17/2013*
*
NOTE: OBJECTION TO MOTION TO CONTINUE; PENALTY PHASE

Looks like the state is moving forward.

Did Judge Sherry rule or they going to cover this motion at hearing on the 20th?

It looks like it is simply the state's response to the defense's motion. Had she ruled, I think it would have been on the court page and likely would have been big news.
 
On Patty (sp?) Patti Womack:

The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial:
9 hours ago
Patti Womack on Dr. Drew accusing this page of posting a map to her house - LIAR! Where's the proof? Show me where we posted a map you liar. I have no idea where she even lives nor do I care.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis?filter=3&_fb_noscript=1

Then this site said she never received a "direct threat", however, I listened to the video and didn't hear her say that. Dr. Drew Dr Drew characterized the situation as an indirect threat, as far as I recall. Maybe you can give it a listen to confirm. She did, however, directly state that she has never been in trouble with the law, so that rumor about the drug DUI seems particularly malicious. If it is not true, whoever was the source of that info, could be sued for libel.

I listened to her on Dr Drew last night. Yeah, she said she never received a threat, but that it concerned her that the site that gave out her address had 50,000 members. She has a little daughter and she gets emotional for her safety.

Is this patty girl the one seen in the court gallery with the huge tattoos?
 
On Patty (sp?) Patti Womack:

The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial:
9 hours ago
Patti Womack on Dr. Drew accusing this page of posting a map to her house - LIAR! Where's the proof? Show me where we posted a map you liar. I have no idea where she even lives nor do I care.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis?filter=3&_fb_noscript=1

Then this site said she never received a "direct threat", however, I listened to the video and didn't hear her say that. Dr. Drew Dr Drew characterized the situation as an indirect threat, as far as I recall. Maybe you can give it a listen to confirm. She did, however, directly state that she has never been in trouble with the law, so that rumor about the drug DUI seems particularly malicious. If it is not true, whoever was the source of that info, could be sued for libel.

I listened to her on Dr Drew last night. Yeah, she said she never received a threat, but that it concerned her that the site that gave out her address had 50,000 members. She has a little daughter and she gets emotional for her safety.

Is this patty girl the one seen in the court gallery with the huge tattoos?

Yes.
If you look above, the site that she blamed denied doing it. I have no idea who is telling the truth. I haven't been there on a daily basis. But if she is truly concerned, she needs to stop doing TV interviews, as well.
 
On Patty (sp?) Patti Womack:

The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial:
9 hours ago
Patti Womack on Dr. Drew accusing this page of posting a map to her house - LIAR! Where's the proof? Show me where we posted a map you liar. I have no idea where she even lives nor do I care.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis?filter=3&_fb_noscript=1

Then this site said she never received a "direct threat", however, I listened to the video and didn't hear her say that. Dr. Drew Dr Drew characterized the situation as an indirect threat, as far as I recall. Maybe you can give it a listen to confirm. She did, however, directly state that she has never been in trouble with the law, so that rumor about the drug DUI seems particularly malicious. If it is not true, whoever was the source of that info, could be sued for libel.

I listened to her on Dr Drew last night. Yeah, she said she never received a threat, but that it concerned her that the site that gave out her address had 50,000 members. She has a little daughter and she gets emotional for her safety.

Is this patty girl the one seen in the court gallery with the huge tattoos?

I haven't read the defense's motion in a while. Do you recall if they specifically stated that she had received threats? Or did they describe it only as intimidation? I can't recall.
 
>>Yeah, she said she never received a threat,

I'm sure you covered this, but that's going to go really shitty for the defense and the FINE! We're not calling any witnesses then! motion.
 
Is she that dumb? That whole motion hangs on her getting death threats and it hasn't even been ruled on yet.
 
The motion says threatened, but he specifically said death threats in court - no?

Memorandum of Points and Authorities
I. RELEVANT FACTS
On May 24, 2013, a mistrial was declared as to the penalty phase due to the fact
that the jury could not reach a unanimous decis
ion as to whether or
not Ms. Arias should
be put to death or if she should be sentenced to spend the rest of her life in prison. On
this same day this court scheduled the subsequent penalty phase on July 18, 2013.
Before the penalty phase began Ms. Arias moved to dismiss the death penalty due
to the fact that she could not present a complete mitigation case. On May 20, 2013,
during the argument on that motion, Ms. Arias advised the court that Patricia Womack
was not willing to return to Arizona to testi
fy on Ms. Arias’ behalf because she had been
threatened.
 
Is she that dumb? That whole motion hangs on her getting death threats and it hasn't even been ruled on yet.

Plus the Arias family friend who called her a "wayward child". That's going to, at least partially, put a damper on the parental abuse allegations.
 
The motion says threatened, but he specifically said death threats in court - no?

Memorandum of Points and Authorities
I. RELEVANT FACTS
On May 24, 2013, a mistrial was declared as to the penalty phase due to the fact
that the jury could not reach a unanimous decis
ion as to whether or
not Ms. Arias should
be put to death or if she should be sentenced to spend the rest of her life in prison. On
this same day this court scheduled the subsequent penalty phase on July 18, 2013.
Before the penalty phase began Ms. Arias moved to dismiss the death penalty due
to the fact that she could not present a complete mitigation case. On May 20, 2013,
during the argument on that motion, Ms. Arias advised the court that Patricia Womack
was not willing to return to Arizona to testi
fy on Ms. Arias’ behalf because she had been
threatened.

I can't recall the specifics of what the defense wrote or said in court, but I think Jodi Arias said that Womack received " threats" in her allocution. (I'm not sure if she called it death threats or not) Lying liar lying pants.
And Martinez wasn't able to cross or dispute it.
 
Last edited:
You know, what those fools on State vs Arias FB page is so totally unprofessional and scuzzy, they could have denied it without looking like a$$holes.
 
You know, what those fools on State vs Arias FB page is so totally unprofessional and scuzzy, they could have denied it without looking like a$$holes.

They have had some good information as well. I'm refraining from the scuzzy terminology, I haven't seen anything firsthand that looked threatening, although I'm guessing they may have pushed the envelope ethically at one time or another. If the posting of the address and map originated from that site, I would imagine someone would have screen grabbed it (like the defense) in order to prove the accusation. Or not. I have to split the difference here because Womack isn't being completely honest either, me thinks. Like I said before, she was willing to testify before cross, in her depo, by Martinez, in spite of real or perceived threats.
 
Mmmmmm.... they got the camera wrong. It was "I know I'm forgetting something...where is it?!" In Flores' hand "oh that's where the damn camera is!".

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MiCj1xElOo&feature=youtu.be]Jodi Arias Controversial Movie Trailer Shows Graphic Murder Scene (Viewer Discretion Advised) - YouTube[/ame]
 
You know, what those fools on State vs Arias FB page is so totally unprofessional and scuzzy, they could have denied it without looking like a$$holes.

They have had some good information as well. I'm refraining from the scuzzy terminology, I haven't seen anything firsthand that looked threatening, although I'm guessing they may have pushed the envelope ethically at one time or another. If the posting of the address and map originated from that site, I would imagine someone would have screen grabbed it (like the defense) in order to prove the accusation. Or not. I have to split the difference here because Womack isn't being completely honest either, me thinks. Like I said before, she was willing to testify before cross, in her depo, by Martinez, in spite of real or perceived threats.

I agree, it's just slipped from "fact" or "justice" to inappropriately put and defensive posts.
 
Mmmmmm.... they got the camera wrong. It was "I know I'm forgetting something...where is it?!" In Flores' hand "oh that's where the damn camera is!".

Jodi Arias Controversial Movie Trailer Shows Graphic Murder Scene (Viewer Discretion Advised) - YouTube

I can't even bring myself to look at it. Plus, Lifetime. Enough said.

Yeah, even if I had cable, I'd be skipping that movie, but the murder clip was interesting.

I'm anti-manhater Lifetime channel and pretty much anti-manhater period.

Men are goooood.

lol
 
Last edited:
Mmmmmm.... they got the camera wrong. It was "I know I'm forgetting something...where is it?!" In Flores' hand "oh that's where the damn camera is!".

Jodi Arias Controversial Movie Trailer Shows Graphic Murder Scene (Viewer Discretion Advised) - YouTube

I can't even bring myself to look at it. Plus, Lifetime. Enough said.

Yeah, even if I had cable, I'd be skipping that movie, but the murder clip was interesting.

I'm anti-manhater Lifetime channel.

I don't think I've ever watched one thing on Lifetime.
 
On Patty (sp?) Patti Womack:

The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial:
9 hours ago
Patti Womack on Dr. Drew accusing this page of posting a map to her house - LIAR! Where's the proof? Show me where we posted a map you liar. I have no idea where she even lives nor do I care.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis?filter=3&_fb_noscript=1

Then this site said she never received a "direct threat", however, I listened to the video and didn't hear her say that. Dr. Drew Dr Drew characterized the situation as an indirect threat, as far as I recall. Maybe you can give it a listen to confirm. She did, however, directly state that she has never been in trouble with the law, so that rumor about the drug DUI seems particularly malicious. If it is not true, whoever was the source of that info, could be sued for libel.

Hi all just catching up. Hope you are around. I always wondered about the drug thing because the only thing I ever found/saw on it was a tweet with nothing confirmable. If there was a court record you'd think that would be posted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top