Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans have broken voter turnout records in every state so far. I'm pretty sure that is the result of the Trump phenomenon. I'm also pretty sure a lot of his supporters will disappear with him if he loses the nomination. I know how much a lot of you dislike Trump, but at this point he is probably the best bet for a Republican win.
These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
If you like Trump, the chances are very good you have an authoritarian personally or strong inclinations thereof
...
The good news is most people are not very authoritarian
These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
Of course............it is a consumer tax.................Just like Cruz's VAT tax plan that he says is not a VAT..........but analysis have already called them on it................These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
Of course............it is a consumer tax.................Just like Cruz's VAT tax plan that he says is not a VAT..........but analysis have already called them on it................These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
Before we had an income tax almost all revenue was via duties collected from Tariffs...............Tariffs are a bargaining tool and why deals were done country to country in the past........in order to negotiate winners and losers for each side...hashing it out 1 on 1............now they are settled in a court room of the WTO where we are ordered to change our laws.................
Foreign entities ORDERING us to CHANGE OUR LAWS...............do you have a problem with that? I most certainly do have a problem with that.
These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
That is the basic lie of the left economically. Consumers pay all taxes, businesses pass them on, they don't eat them. It's bizarre how the left grasp that if the cost of steel goes up that's a cost and companies pass it on. Then when you point out that taxes are a cost, they pass it on, the left is like what? That makes no sense
His sister.That is one of the things that worries me about Trump. What kind of pick will he make?2 more Supremes will more than likely be at stake as well............Scalia just put it front and center instead of a back burner issue...................Think about this as part of a dynamic process if you really want to anticipate what will eventually happen.
Right now Trump is going up in polls, and there is no reason to believe he has some fictional cap. People were saying that about Romney in 2012 as well and were proven wrong. Trump isnt polling high as a second choice, but he has been a lot of peoples third or forth choice behind idealistic candidates like Carson and Kasich.
Hillary is dropping in the polls as she shows the world she is a cheating cantankerous old hag, cheating Sanders, lying to authorities about her email and secured document handling and may be indicted just prior to the election. Her poll numbers will continue to drop.
Rubio is a provenliar, and though he has rising numbers, as people become more informed with his track record he will start hemorraging supporters.
Rubio is a loser no matter who yo put up against him. He even makes Hillary look honest.
You are letting your dislike of Rubio cloud your thinking. He isn't my first choice but I can easily see him beating both Democrat candidates handily. It's a fact that lying is almost a positive thing with most democrats and many independants. Obama's reelection proves that. Plus there are a great many voters who vote for stupid reasons like looks, youth, and ethnicity which Rubio has all of. He beats either candidate pretty easily, IMO.
I think you are correct Pred. He would probably win the easiest, which would make the establishment happy as hell since he is absolutely controllable. How much actual change we would get is the big question. If winning the easiest is the number 1 desire of GOP voters, then Rubio is their guy!
I used to care more about conservative credentials, but the death of Scalia has made having a republican make the choice is now the most important factor in this race.
I'm hardly a leftist and every time we get on this issue I am called that...............so be it.............our jobs are leaving...........one aspect is the regulations nightmare and high taxes of this country...........the other is we don't have a level playing field............Since we have higher standards of income, Regulations, and etc......Free Trade Agreements with countries like Mexico and China give them the advantage as they don't play by the same rules...........Many call this Fair Trade.........In regards to Canada.........we have similar laws and regs so the field is level................China has virtually no EPA standards and Regs whatsoever............These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
That is the basic lie of the left economically. Consumers pay all taxes, businesses pass them on, they don't eat them. It's bizarre how the left grasp that if the cost of steel goes up that's a cost and companies pass it on. Then when you point out that taxes are a cost, they pass it on, the left is like what? That makes no sense
Consumers pay all taxes, businesses pass them on, they don't eat them. It's bizarre how the left grasp that if the cost of steel goes up that's a cost and companies pass it on. Then when you point out that taxes are a cost, they pass it on, the left is like what? That makes no sense
For instance if given the choice, I would rather deal with a company that has American workers on the end of the phone instead of foreigners that I can't understand, or phone systems where you have to push ten different buttons to get to the person you want to discuss an issue wit
I'm hardly a leftist and every time we get on this issue I am called that...............so be it.............our jobs are leaving...........one aspect is the regulations nightmare and high taxes of this country...........the other is we don't have a level playing field............Since we have higher standards of income, Regulations, and etc......Free Trade Agreements with countries like Mexico and China give them the advantage as they don't play by the same rules...........Many call this Fair Trade.........In regards to Canada.........we have similar laws and regs so the field is level................China has virtually no EPA standards and Regs whatsoever............These tax plans have been platform issues forever..............promising great New Tax plans and they never happen.........we've had tax cuts in the past and historically they haven't lost the revenues that everyone said would happen. Revenues actually historically went up do to increased investment.......primarily in the Markets and not on main street.
It is possible that once Inversion is ended........it will not all go to creation of jobs......and it is possible that the Lion's share of the money would go to the casino of Wall Street.
Bottom line for me.............I want a simplified code..........that maintains revenue...........that causes job growth..............and stops the companies from hauling ass............
I have no problem at all with ending the Free Trade Horse Hockey plans.............and negotiating on a 1 on 1 between countries to hammer out the losses in the Trade balances where we are getting hammered......If that means Tariffs.............then so be it..............It worked before someone said it was broken, and will work again..........as a matter of fact..........before the creation of the IRS it was the primary means of Federal Revenue for this country.
When imported steel started to be a problem under Bush, he instituted a tariff. Our trading partners in return put a tariff on our goods being shipped there, so it was a wash and Bush had to back down.
Tariffs don't solve anything. I think what might help is if we Americans were more supportive of our own workers. Let's face it, do any of us look on the packaging of our goods to see where it was made? I don't, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either
Recently Obama signed getting rid of Country of Origin Labeling after we lost in a WTO Court against Mexico and Canada..............After losing the Court allowed Tariffs for compensation to Mexico and Canada. So if we do as you say they will file suit against us again and then order us to change our laws again. As we get hit with tariffs again by the World Court.
Under these free trade agreements, the World tells us how to trade and in this case tells us to change our laws. I have a serious problem with that. If they want to do business here they must obey our laws. Just as we must obey their laws when doing business there.
You talk about the steel..........but cases were filed in the WTO and Bush didn't counter their tariffs after they countered ours...........we could quota their asses and hurt them economically if we are negotiating with them to try and reverse our Trade deficits................and one example doesn't make all of them wrong anyway........
In auto manufacturing, Tariffs in the past caused foreign investment here to avoid them...........I'm not talking Detroit but the South in companies like Nissan and Toyota.
It is a give an take deal to get the best Trade position possible to prevent all the jobs from hauling ass............worked for 200 plus years until someone said it was broken.
But you have to ask yourself who ultimately pays these tariffs? Yes, that would be us, the US consumer.
That is the basic lie of the left economically. Consumers pay all taxes, businesses pass them on, they don't eat them. It's bizarre how the left grasp that if the cost of steel goes up that's a cost and companies pass it on. Then when you point out that taxes are a cost, they pass it on, the left is like what? That makes no sense
Free Trade has cost us MILLIONS of jobs...............so have high taxes and regulations............If you are in favor of Cheap foreign goods at the DESTRUCTION of our industrial base..........then you favor Free Trade.
Perhaps you like the United States being told to change it's laws from a Foreign court as well................
I remember your statements in the past Kaz.............If I were to do work on your electrical I would CHARGE you triple the price for the new age of America................Because back on that thread you took a dump on Blue Collar Workers.........saying oh well if those jobs get hammered.
We can't allow the jobs to go out of country at the levels happening now without destroying the American Worker.
I agree, the RNC is going to pick who they want, not who the people want, and thats not Trump. Just like the DNC is going to pick Hillary even though its clear the people want Bernie.Then it's a bet republicans will lose.Republicans have broken voter turnout records in every state so far. I'm pretty sure that is the result of the Trump phenomenon. I'm also pretty sure a lot of his supporters will disappear with him if he loses the nomination. I know how much a lot of you dislike Trump, but at this point he is probably the best bet for a Republican win.
