Maybe I'm beginning to understand this Trump thing

[Mac1958]

I'm correct, then?

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

 

[sartre play]

My self unhappy with how both major party's are conducting their self's, while the rage go's on not many are looking with open mind at some of the people & policy's being put in place. this is what we should be talking about.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, since Hillary had it in the bag and the recounts showed Trump lost and the electors were faithless and Comey proved collusion with the Russians, and......

You butthurt fools never learn, do you?

Trump will be president through 2024 - that is a fact you'll have to learn to deal with, little brown shirted retard.

Dude, he'll probably be impeached or removed before 2020.

 

[Toro]

After a LOT of observation and asking a LOT of questions, I've settled on one specific theory as to why Trump's fans have watched and cheered as he has done what he has done to the office of President of the United States: This is one, final, loud, angry primal scream, an historic vent, based on years of pent-up and growing frustration, a guy screaming FUCK YOU to his enemies as he blows up a building with he and his enemies in it.

They've said it themselves: They really DO NOT CARE what he does while in office, because a higher priority for them is pissing off their enemies. How many times have you seen that said on this forum? They've said it over and over. They're gonna hurt their enemies, even if it means real destruction to everything else. Kind of an over-the-top, hopeless, radical chemotherapy treatment for a terminal cancer patient.

Trump's is the first "Fuck it, blow it up, I don't give a shit" presidency. They've been made angrier and angrier by people who have a vested professional interest in fanning the flames, and I also think they realize they let it all get away from them, and now it's just too late. So, fuck it. Blow it up. Then let it burn.

So Trump is their last, loud gasp, their final FUCK YOU, and they're gonna cheer as the building goes up in flames.
.

It's really more about blowing up the entire system, which is not working for them.

 

[ricechickie]

Is this where you support Hillary for Pres in 2020?


Obama was a moderate.

Oh please please please run Hillary in 2020. Or since you have such an interesting idea of what "moderate" means, run Maxine Waters....

I hope that Hillary disappears forever.

 

[JoeB131]

The opposition party needs to win 24 seats to take control of the House in 2018. Understandably, operatives and handicappers have focused on the 23 districts that Republicans hold, which voted for Hillary Clinton last year. But some of the incumbents are very popular, with brands that are distinct from Trump’s, and they are unlikely to lose no matter how bad the headwinds become.

In other words, it’s inconceivable that Democrats run the table in those 23 districts. Even if they did, they’d still be one short. And Democrats must defend 12 seats in districts that Trump carried in 2016.

Actually, 2018 will be a wave election. You have the perfect storm of a president with unprecedented unpopularity and a congressional approval rating near single digits.

the only saving grace you guys have is the Senate, and only because you have almost no seats up there.

 

[ricechickie]

Those are the crazies in action. No elected member of the Democrat party are endorsing that behavior, unlike the Tweeter-in-Chief quoting shit by Alex Jones.

They are crazies, they are also mainstream democrats.

As for quoting Alex Jones, it could be FAR worse...

Uncensored "I'mnotangry" 2008.....

Oh, I'm enjoying the complete unraveling of the fascist democrat party.

Y'all went crazy in 2000, but that passed to a certain extent. The left is utterly out of control now and keeps reminding America why you must NEVER be allowed in power again. Keep your brown shirts on the streets with the democrat Kristalnachts just so no one fails to grasp what your party is all about.

Here it is, the traditional "your political party is finished" speech! Along with the ever-present Nazi comparison! Thank you, Uncensored "Libertarian" 2008.

It was stupid when liberals said it to conservatives when Obama was elected, too. Just in case you think I can't see it from both sides.

Happy Fourth!

Yeah, why would anyone say that your party is reminiscent of 1925 Berlin?

It's so unfair.....

Because they're not targeting Jews?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Is this where you support Hillary for Pres in 2020?


Obama was a moderate.

Oh please please please run Hillary in 2020. Or since you have such an interesting idea of what "moderate" means, run Maxine Waters....

I hope that Hillary disappears forever.

Waters/Ellison 2020, it's a slam dunk. Bleev me... "Make America Mecca Again!"

 

[Uncensored2008]

They are crazies, they are also mainstream democrats.

As for quoting Alex Jones, it could be FAR worse...

Uncensored "I'mnotangry" 2008.....

Oh, I'm enjoying the complete unraveling of the fascist democrat party.

Y'all went crazy in 2000, but that passed to a certain extent. The left is utterly out of control now and keeps reminding America why you must NEVER be allowed in power again. Keep your brown shirts on the streets with the democrat Kristalnachts just so no one fails to grasp what your party is all about.

Here it is, the traditional "your political party is finished" speech! Along with the ever-present Nazi comparison! Thank you, Uncensored "Libertarian" 2008.

It was stupid when liberals said it to conservatives when Obama was elected, too. Just in case you think I can't see it from both sides.

Happy Fourth!

Yeah, why would anyone say that your party is reminiscent of 1925 Berlin?

It's so unfair.....

Because they're not targeting Jews?

You were saying?

 

[ricechickie]

Uncensored "I'mnotangry" 2008.....

Oh, I'm enjoying the complete unraveling of the fascist democrat party.

Y'all went crazy in 2000, but that passed to a certain extent. The left is utterly out of control now and keeps reminding America why you must NEVER be allowed in power again. Keep your brown shirts on the streets with the democrat Kristalnachts just so no one fails to grasp what your party is all about.

Here it is, the traditional "your political party is finished" speech! Along with the ever-present Nazi comparison! Thank you, Uncensored "Libertarian" 2008.

It was stupid when liberals said it to conservatives when Obama was elected, too. Just in case you think I can't see it from both sides.

Happy Fourth!

Yeah, why would anyone say that your party is reminiscent of 1925 Berlin?

It's so unfair.....

Because they're not targeting Jews?

You were saying?

Well, since you conflate Dems with Nazis, it's a natural that you'd conflate them with Socialists.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

I'm correct, then?

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

WTF are you talking about? I've directly addressed the OP. You made a value judgment against Trump and his supporters and I absolutely gave you a serious rebuttal that you have all but ignored; and now you're making a heinous allegation of derailment.

Go ahead and explain on this thread or a PM how it is you think I've derailed your thread. Cos I'm calling bull shit on you.

 

[Mac1958]

I'm correct, then?

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

WTF are you talking about? I've directly addressed the OP. You made a value judgment against Trump and his supporters and I absolutely gave you a serious rebuttal that you have all but ignored; and now you're making a heinous allegation of derailment.

Maybe I missed it. Go ahead and re-post it.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh, I'm enjoying the complete unraveling of the fascist democrat party.

Y'all went crazy in 2000, but that passed to a certain extent. The left is utterly out of control now and keeps reminding America why you must NEVER be allowed in power again. Keep your brown shirts on the streets with the democrat Kristalnachts just so no one fails to grasp what your party is all about.

Here it is, the traditional "your political party is finished" speech! Along with the ever-present Nazi comparison! Thank you, Uncensored "Libertarian" 2008.

It was stupid when liberals said it to conservatives when Obama was elected, too. Just in case you think I can't see it from both sides.

Happy Fourth!

Yeah, why would anyone say that your party is reminiscent of 1925 Berlin?

It's so unfair.....

Because they're not targeting Jews?

You were saying?

Well, since you conflate Dems with Nazis, it's a natural that you'd conflate them with Socialists.

All the same authoritarian globalists, the fascist left.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm correct, then?

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

Defeating you on content is hardly derailing your thread.

 

[Mac1958]

I'm correct, then?

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

Defeating you on content is hardly derailing your thread.

"Defeating"?

Where is that scoreboard, by the way?

In your biased mind, perhaps?
.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

WTF are you talking about? I've directly addressed the OP. You made a value judgment against Trump and his supporters and I absolutely gave you a serious rebuttal that you have all but ignored; and now you're making a heinous allegation of derailment.

Maybe I missed it. Go ahead and re-post it.
.

Okay. Here is my original response:

Dude, you make so many self-serving OP's. We have a gaslighting media, clearly. We have politcal elites who serve corporate masters. We just got done having a 'president' who was more worried about defending Islam and relegating us to other countries' standards. We have illegal immigrant subverting sovereignty. And you really want to make this about us blowing the shit up? Give me a break, dude.

In essence, I stated that we live in a plutocracy (to say nothing of the fascist overtones). Your response through and through was only to focus on the semantics before saying I was derailing the thread. But it doesn't erase that is the essence of Trump supporters, imo. Some will argue this and that about Trump, but that is at least the driving force, honestly.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If that makes you feel better. Will that make you sleep at night? Do you think that Washington is on your side at the end of the day? Are you that worried about them getting metaphorically blown up?

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

Defeating you on content is hardly derailing your thread.

"Defeating"?

Where is that scoreboard, by the way?

In your biased mind, perhaps?
.

Did you ever offer a cogent response to his argument?

No? Then he defeated you.

You hate Trump, we get it. But don't pretend that you're doing anything other than crying over losing the election.

 

[Mac1958]

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

WTF are you talking about? I've directly addressed the OP. You made a value judgment against Trump and his supporters and I absolutely gave you a serious rebuttal that you have all but ignored; and now you're making a heinous allegation of derailment.

Maybe I missed it. Go ahead and re-post it.
.

Okay. Here is my original response:

Dude, you make so many self-serving OP's. We have a gaslighting media, clearly. We have politcal elites who serve corporate masters. We just got done having a 'president' who was more worried about defending Islam and relegating us to other countries' standards. We have illegal immigrant subverting sovereignty. And you really want to make this about us blowing the shit up? Give me a break, dude.

In essence, I stated that we live in a plutocracy (to say nothing of the fascist overtones). Your response through and through was only to focus on the semantics before saying I was derailing the thread. But it doesn't erase that is the essence of Trump supporters, imo. Some will argue this and that about Trump, but that is at least the driving force, honestly.

Yes, I saw that post. You were deflecting away from Trump's behaviors and how his followers tolerate them and changing the subject to something else.

Deflecting from a thread doesn't address the thread.
.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

Defeating you on content is hardly derailing your thread.

"Defeating"?

Where is that scoreboard, by the way?

In your biased mind, perhaps?
.

Did you ever offer a cogent response to his argument?

No? Then he defeated you.

You hate Trump, we get it. But don't pretend that you're doing anything other than crying over losing the election.

As far as I know, Mac was not any sort of Hillary supporter. If I had to guess, he even spoke out against her more than anything. But it does seem that the OP was definitely a big bag of whining and complete disregard for Trump or anyone who dared to support him in any capacity.

 

[Mac1958]

You could just say "yes".
.

Are you going to argue against anything I said, or are you just going to passive aggressively pout? Cos you haven't argued against my multi post rebuttal to a tizzy of an OP.

I don't allow people to derail my thread until I'm done with it.

If you want to bring up other topics (aka "change the subject"), just start a thread and tag me.
.

Defeating you on content is hardly derailing your thread.

"Defeating"?

Where is that scoreboard, by the way?

In your biased mind, perhaps?
.

Did you ever offer a cogent response to his argument?

No? Then he defeated you.

You hate Trump, we get it. But don't pretend that you're doing anything other than crying over losing the election.

Where did he "defeat" me, precisely? With the attempt at deflection, above?
.