Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.How is the first black FLOTUS not a civil rights activist? Go ahead and try and explain that oneIt is more educational than your erroneous labeling of Michelle Obama as a "civil rights activist".Making idiotic statements is not educating. Try harder. This statement of your offers zero education only idiocracy:
Michelle Obama is just another privileged black moron.
She doesn't know the meaning of the words "civil rights".
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.How is the first black FLOTUS not a civil rights activist? Go ahead and try and explain that oneIt is more educational than your erroneous labeling of Michelle Obama as a "civil rights activist".
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I ask for numbers and not an editorial so you post an editorial...'I'd love to look at those numbers, can you provide them for me so I can see what you are talking about? Real numbers not an editorial article.No you don't. You can support diversity promoting programs that help create opportunity and education for minority groups and promote businesses to take more applications from minority groups and women without requiring that they hire minorities and women over white males. There are plenty of things that can be done through social messaging and programs and not necessarily legal regulations. You just need to open yourself to the conversation and stop looking at everything as black and white.Yes, best for the job is a fair requirement. Do you agree that it is important to support diversity in this country?
You either support one or the other.
Like how Whites, and Asians, with the same Sat scores are less likely to get into college than Blacks, or Hispanics?
As Nieli puts it, “Being Hispanic conferred an admissions boost over being white … equivalent to 130 SAT points (out of 1,600), while being black rather than white conferred a 310-point SAT advantage. Asians, however, suffered an admissions penalty compared to whites equivalent to 140 SAT points.”
“To have the same chance of gaining admission as a black student with a SAT score of 1100, a Hispanic student otherwise equally matched in background characteristics would have to have 1230, a white student a 1410 and an Asian student a 1550.”
Read more at Bias and bigotry in academia
Thats wonderful... Whats your point?Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.How is the first black FLOTUS not a civil rights activist? Go ahead and try and explain that one
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
Obama got the White vote more than Hillary did.
You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.How is the first black FLOTUS not a civil rights activist? Go ahead and try and explain that oneIt is more educational than your erroneous labeling of Michelle Obama as a "civil rights activist".
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.How is the first black FLOTUS not a civil rights activist? Go ahead and try and explain that one
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
If you aren't talking about "rights", then you aren't talking about "civil RIGHTS activists" either.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
I ask for numbers and not an editorial so you post an editorial...'I'd love to look at those numbers, can you provide them for me so I can see what you are talking about? Real numbers not an editorial article.No you don't. You can support diversity promoting programs that help create opportunity and education for minority groups and promote businesses to take more applications from minority groups and women without requiring that they hire minorities and women over white males. There are plenty of things that can be done through social messaging and programs and not necessarily legal regulations. You just need to open yourself to the conversation and stop looking at everything as black and white.You either support one or the other.
Like how Whites, and Asians, with the same Sat scores are less likely to get into college than Blacks, or Hispanics?
As Nieli puts it, “Being Hispanic conferred an admissions boost over being white … equivalent to 130 SAT points (out of 1,600), while being black rather than white conferred a 310-point SAT advantage. Asians, however, suffered an admissions penalty compared to whites equivalent to 140 SAT points.”
“To have the same chance of gaining admission as a black student with a SAT score of 1100, a Hispanic student otherwise equally matched in background characteristics would have to have 1230, a white student a 1410 and an Asian student a 1550.”
Read more at Bias and bigotry in academia
Keep trying dude, I can barely hear you anymoreIf you aren't talking about "rights", then you aren't talking about "civil RIGHTS activists" either.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
Try again.
Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.If anything the existence of a black First Lady means that civil rights activism for black people is redundant.
It is legitimately baffling how you actually think the first black First Lady automatically is thrown into some kind of struggle when she knows the vast majority of the country is more than willing to allow her husband substantial power over their lives.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
I know the idiots who you do listen to are just as inferior to me as you are.Keep trying dude, I can barely hear you anymoreIf you aren't talking about "rights", then you aren't talking about "civil RIGHTS activists" either.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
Try again.
Who am I? I'm a guy questioning your claims and asking for you to back them up with facts and not opinions. I can make up some numbers and put them on here or I can give verifiable stats to back up my claims. It all depends on how serious I want people to take me. You obviously don't want to be taken seriously.I ask for numbers and not an editorial so you post an editorial...'I'd love to look at those numbers, can you provide them for me so I can see what you are talking about? Real numbers not an editorial article.No you don't. You can support diversity promoting programs that help create opportunity and education for minority groups and promote businesses to take more applications from minority groups and women without requiring that they hire minorities and women over white males. There are plenty of things that can be done through social messaging and programs and not necessarily legal regulations. You just need to open yourself to the conversation and stop looking at everything as black and white.
Like how Whites, and Asians, with the same Sat scores are less likely to get into college than Blacks, or Hispanics?
As Nieli puts it, “Being Hispanic conferred an admissions boost over being white … equivalent to 130 SAT points (out of 1,600), while being black rather than white conferred a 310-point SAT advantage. Asians, however, suffered an admissions penalty compared to whites equivalent to 140 SAT points.”
“To have the same chance of gaining admission as a black student with a SAT score of 1100, a Hispanic student otherwise equally matched in background characteristics would have to have 1230, a white student a 1410 and an Asian student a 1550.”
Read more at Bias and bigotry in academia
Who are you to make such demands?
The article clearly does give such numbers, but it's not good enough for you princess?
He is a braindead media drone.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
It's better not to type and just let us "think" you're an idiot than to actually prove it by posting. If one is speaking about a "Civil Rights" activist by extension one is automatically speaking about "Rights".
Good lord.
You two Yahoos need some serious help.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.What are you talking about? "The first black first lady is thrown into some kind of struggle"? What does that have to do with anything that i've said? You are making the idiotic claim that she is not a civil rights activist, thats what I was responding to.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
It's better not to type and just let us "think" you're an idiot than to actually prove it by posting. If one is speaking about a "Civil Rights" activist by extension one is automatically speaking about "Rights".
Good lord.
Spoken like somebody who has a true superiority complex. Wish you could see how dumb you look from this side of the mirror.I know the idiots who you do listen to are just as inferior to me as you are.Keep trying dude, I can barely hear you anymoreIf you aren't talking about "rights", then you aren't talking about "civil RIGHTS activists" either.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a joke
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
Try again.
Don't worry.
Who am I? I'm a guy questioning your claims and asking for you to back them up with facts and not opinions. I can make up some numbers and put them on here or I can give verifiable stats to back up my claims. It all depends on how serious I want people to take me. You obviously don't want to be taken seriously.I ask for numbers and not an editorial so you post an editorial...'I'd love to look at those numbers, can you provide them for me so I can see what you are talking about? Real numbers not an editorial article.Like how Whites, and Asians, with the same Sat scores are less likely to get into college than Blacks, or Hispanics?
As Nieli puts it, “Being Hispanic conferred an admissions boost over being white … equivalent to 130 SAT points (out of 1,600), while being black rather than white conferred a 310-point SAT advantage. Asians, however, suffered an admissions penalty compared to whites equivalent to 140 SAT points.”
“To have the same chance of gaining admission as a black student with a SAT score of 1100, a Hispanic student otherwise equally matched in background characteristics would have to have 1230, a white student a 1410 and an Asian student a 1550.”
Read more at Bias and bigotry in academia
Who are you to make such demands?
The article clearly does give such numbers, but it's not good enough for you princess?
I'm not saying you are wrong, you may very well be right... i'm just saying show some real stats that I can look at to see whats happening. Reading biased editorials is not going to get us anywhere. Is that were you get all your news from?
Black people are more likely to get into the schools they want than anyone else.You two Yahoos need some serious help.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
It's better not to type and just let us "think" you're an idiot than to actually prove it by posting. If one is speaking about a "Civil Rights" activist by extension one is automatically speaking about "Rights".
Good lord.
Michelle Obama: Education Is Today’s Important Civil-Rights Issue
She was talking about elected Congressmen and Senators. And it's true. The Republican side of the house is almost all men and all white. There is far more diversity among Democrats.Michelle Obama laments lack of diversity in ‘all men, all white’ GOP
There are only 2 choices.....racist or stupid.......
You two Yahoos need some serious help.Im not talking about Rights. For you to suggest that shows that you aren't paying attention. Keep rolling with the Black privilege narrative and i'll keep laughing with the rest of America. Silly little boy.You can't name ONE right that blacks don't have in regards to every other group.Haha. Are you really trying to make the point that because we had a black president there is no need for civil rights activists to represent the black community? All the racial problems are solved? And then the icing on your stupidity, "whats are being oppressed"? Dude, get a clue. You are a jokeShe isn't. She is nothing but a demagogue.
If black people needed a civil rights activist, Michelle Obama never would have been the FLOTUS in the first place. Not to mention the endless black advocacy groups that are funded or at least supported by the federal government.
It is white people who are having our rights taken away, not black people.
I can name several Constitutional amendments that are nearly nullified when it comes to their application when dealing with white citizens of this country.
The fact that you think "racial problems" are always about blacks and other non-whites, while at the same time you actually think I am a "joke" for even trying to steer that conversation towards white people just proves how right I am. Black people are privileged beyond your little imagination.
It's better not to type and just let us "think" you're an idiot than to actually prove it by posting. If one is speaking about a "Civil Rights" activist by extension one is automatically speaking about "Rights".
Good lord.
Michelle Obama: Education Is Today’s Important Civil-Rights Issue
