Besides the million and a half he already released?Might help if our fat boy let his people release documents.
Maybe that's because there IS none (except, of course, the evidence Adam Schiff has). LOLHard to investigate w/o evidence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Besides the million and a half he already released?Might help if our fat boy let his people release documents.
Maybe that's because there IS none (except, of course, the evidence Adam Schiff has). LOLHard to investigate w/o evidence
Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?They will be laughingly known as "The Party Of Investigations".
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?They will be laughingly known as "The Party Of Investigations".
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?They will be laughingly known as "The Party Of Investigations".
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
Do you FAP to the picture of Mueller in your Avatar?Fucking imbecile, I've literally never once said trump is an illegitimate president. I never once said I don't accept the results of the election.Again, you are in here every day stirring up shit, and claiming Trump is an illegitimate president, unfit for office, anything you can say to express your hatred of him.LOLComing from a pole smoking LibTard who is part of "The Resistance" who never accepted The Results of The Election."You did not accept the results of The Election"It's not our fault that you aren't very intelligent and do not understand how any of this works.
Who is the better Investigator, Mueller, and his pack of Trump Hating Lawyers, and The FBI, or Fat Jerry Nadler?
There is no impeachment inquiry. It's all made up fictitious shit, and Nadler, Pelosi and the Dems are just abusing their powers. There were no recommendations for indictment that came out of The Mueller Report.
You did not accept the results of The Election just like you did not accept The Results of The Fictitious and Fraudulent Special Counsel Investigation. No Recommendations for indictment were made. Stick to the facts.
It will bite them in the ass in the end.
Their political chest beating means nothing. There is nothing actionable. Mueller, and his Partisan staff which included Strozk, McCabe, Paige, and Preet Bhara, as well as Weismann, could not uncover a single crime.
This is a major flop already, and your party crash and burned the day they paid $14 Million for Russian Propaganda.
Talk of impeachment if just plain silliness and is a desperate attempt by The Democrat Party to stop the hemoragging of people leaving their party. All you have left are hard core radicals
Your party is in a political nose dive, because they bet all their futures on a single horse while their cities and districts are flooded with illegals, drug addicts, shit on the sidewalls, hordes of guns in their gun free zones in the hands of criminals and not law abiding citizens, and heroin needles and trash in the streets.
Sane and educated, and informed people see the writing on the wall.
You do not, and I have to say, you deserve what is coming to you in 2020.
LOLOLOLOLOL
Coming from a rightarded Birther, THAT is fucking hysterical.
![]()
Trump accepted The Results. He is president, and Hillary is a drunk old hag.
Dumbfuck, I never denied trump is president. You've gone over the cliff and disappeared in a puff of smoke.
![]()
You did not accept the results of our election, nor do you accept our duly elected president through the Democratic Process.
Now go find a sheep to love, Left Tard.
You prove over and over and over again that you're batshit delirious.
Virtually everything you post stems from your own delusions and not rooted in reality.
I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?They will be laughingly known as "The Party Of Investigations".
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
LOLOLDo you FAP to the picture of Mueller in your Avatar?Fucking imbecile, I've literally never once said trump is an illegitimate president. I never once said I don't accept the results of the election.Again, you are in here every day stirring up shit, and claiming Trump is an illegitimate president, unfit for office, anything you can say to express your hatred of him.LOLComing from a pole smoking LibTard who is part of "The Resistance" who never accepted The Results of The Election."You did not accept the results of The Election"
LOLOLOLOLOL
Coming from a rightarded Birther, THAT is fucking hysterical.
![]()
Trump accepted The Results. He is president, and Hillary is a drunk old hag.
Dumbfuck, I never denied trump is president. You've gone over the cliff and disappeared in a puff of smoke.
![]()
You did not accept the results of our election, nor do you accept our duly elected president through the Democratic Process.
Now go find a sheep to love, Left Tard.
You prove over and over and over again that you're batshit delirious.
Virtually everything you post stems from your own delusions and not rooted in reality.
Do you cry when you think about how Mueller let you down and failed to complete your COUP?
Do you have hemorrhoids and Itchy butt syndrome every time you hear President Trump's name?
Have some of this. It may help.
![]()
Dayum, you're completely fucking retarded. And here I thought maybe you were just partially retarded. Like from just the neck up.I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
It's Friday night and Mueller's Balls are on your chin, and that is your weak response?LOLOLDo you FAP to the picture of Mueller in your Avatar?Fucking imbecile, I've literally never once said trump is an illegitimate president. I never once said I don't accept the results of the election.Again, you are in here every day stirring up shit, and claiming Trump is an illegitimate president, unfit for office, anything you can say to express your hatred of him.LOLComing from a pole smoking LibTard who is part of "The Resistance" who never accepted The Results of The Election.
Trump accepted The Results. He is president, and Hillary is a drunk old hag.
Dumbfuck, I never denied trump is president. You've gone over the cliff and disappeared in a puff of smoke.
![]()
You did not accept the results of our election, nor do you accept our duly elected president through the Democratic Process.
Now go find a sheep to love, Left Tard.
You prove over and over and over again that you're batshit delirious.
Virtually everything you post stems from your own delusions and not rooted in reality.
Do you cry when you think about how Mueller let you down and failed to complete your COUP?
Do you have hemorrhoids and Itchy butt syndrome every time you hear President Trump's name?
Have some of this. It may help.
![]()
Let's recap.... you bitch and moan about trump being investigated.... then you falsely accuse me of saying things I never said.... then you think I'm the one who needs that salve.
![]()
LOLOLOLIt's Friday night and Mueller's Balls are on your chin, and that is your weak response?LOLOLDo you FAP to the picture of Mueller in your Avatar?Fucking imbecile, I've literally never once said trump is an illegitimate president. I never once said I don't accept the results of the election.Again, you are in here every day stirring up shit, and claiming Trump is an illegitimate president, unfit for office, anything you can say to express your hatred of him.LOL
Dumbfuck, I never denied trump is president. You've gone over the cliff and disappeared in a puff of smoke.
![]()
You did not accept the results of our election, nor do you accept our duly elected president through the Democratic Process.
Now go find a sheep to love, Left Tard.
You prove over and over and over again that you're batshit delirious.
Virtually everything you post stems from your own delusions and not rooted in reality.
Do you cry when you think about how Mueller let you down and failed to complete your COUP?
Do you have hemorrhoids and Itchy butt syndrome every time you hear President Trump's name?
Have some of this. It may help.
![]()
Let's recap.... you bitch and moan about trump being investigated.... then you falsely accuse me of saying things I never said.... then you think I'm the one who needs that salve.
![]()
Do you call Mueller Daddy when he diddles you?
I'm not the bitch acting like a crusader carrying The Mueller Is My Noodle Banner as my Avatar.
Dayum, you're completely fucking retarded. And here I thought maybe you were just partially retarded. Like from just the neck up.I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
Dumbfuck, I never said that video sparked the attack. You must just be too illiterate to comprehend what I actually wrote.
![]()
I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.Forgot Benghazi already?
Oh, that was the uppity nixxer time
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
This is what you said, you dumb SOB...Dayum, you're completely fucking retarded. And here I thought maybe you were just partially retarded. Like from just the neck up.I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?Oh yeah, I remember Benghazi. Wasn't that when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama got our ambassador killed because they didn't give a shit that he was pleading for help during a terrorist attack that they claimed was a spontaneous reaction to a video? Thanks for reminding me, jerkoff.
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
Dumbfuck, I never said that video sparked the attack. You must just be too illiterate to comprehend what I actually wrote.
![]()
What's your trip anyway? You're offended if I swear but not if somebody of YOUR ilk does?Nice foul mouth, trump u?
Oh, well that settles it. Because we know how honest terrorists are.You do know the only terrorist guy in Middle East jail said it was the video?
I'm sure an anti-American POS like you has had many orgasms thinking about both of those events.No problem with ronnie's 250 dead Beirut marines?
But omg 4 in Benghazi and we have an orgasm?
Fucking moron, I never said the protest caused the attack. You remain a fucking moron for thinking I did say that. What I actually said is that the Republican-led investigation found the CIA believed that was the reason for two weeks following the attack until video evidence surfaced showing it was an attack. Which utterly squashed your idiocy that Hillary lied about it.This is what you said, you dumb SOB...Dayum, you're completely fucking retarded. And here I thought maybe you were just partially retarded. Like from just the neck up.I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video. You are a complete moron.Dumbfuck, you should re-read what I posted another 100 times. Maybe then you'll understand why you look like such an idiot for posting that nonsense.Hey jerkoff,Dumbfuck. You never learn, do ya?
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Hillary told Chelsey (in an email) there was a terrorist attack going on at the Benghazi Embassy, then told the public it was a response to a video. But what difference does it make, right?
Obama sent his stooges out to tell the public it was a response to a video and continued to tell that lie at the U.N. AFTER he knew it was a terrorist attack (can't have people thinking he's incompetent with the election coming up in a few weeks). And he wasn't too concerned about their safety since he turned around and went golfing while the attacks were in progress after repeatedly denying requests by the ambassador for help.
They knew it wasn't a response to a video, that was a pathetic lie they made up to avoid having to admit they let 4 people die in a terrorist attack because they were more worried about the election than the lives of 4 Americans
Dumbfuck, I never said that video sparked the attack. You must just be too illiterate to comprehend what I actually wrote.
![]()
"The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi"..
And since you're a moron and have trouble reading plain English, this is what I said...
"I wouldn't be telling somebody else they look like an idiot when you are defending the ridiculous claim that ANYONE ever entertained the idea that the obvious terror attack on Benghazi was a "spontaneous reaction" to a fucking video". Now I know you're an idiot but even an idiot should be able to see the difference between what I actually said and what you stupidly CLAIMED I said. Looks like you're the one who's too illiterate to comprehend what you read.
And as to your other stupid statement...This one...
"The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012".
And on September 25, Obama said THIS at the U.N. General Assembly:
"That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.
It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well". Still lying to the American people (and you're still an idiot).
I did not say that you did, you fucking imbecile. I just drew you a GD picture and you STILL don't comprehend it. Now pay attention, shortbus and I'll say it ONE MORE TIME so your tiny brain can grasp it. Read slowly and try not to get distracted by the cartoons on your tv. YOU DEFENDED THE CLAIM THAT ANYONE ACTUALLY ENTERTAINED THE IDEA THAT THE TERRORIST ATTACK WAS A REACTION TO A VIDEO. If you can't comprehend that sentence, you have the mind of a fucking toddler.Fucking moron, I never said the protest caused the attack.
"YOU DEFENDED THE CLAIM THAT ANYONE ACTUALLY ENTERTAINED THE IDEA THAT THE TERRORIST ATTACK WAS A REACTION TO A VIDEO."I did not say that you did, you fucking imbecile. I just drew you a GD picture and you STILL don't comprehend it. Now pay attention, shortbus and I'll say it ONE MORE TIME so your tiny brain can grasp it. Read slowly and try not to get distracted by the cartoons on your tv. YOU DEFENDED THE CLAIM THAT ANYONE ACTUALLY ENTERTAINED THE IDEA THAT THE TERRORIST ATTACK WAS A REACTION TO A VIDEO. If you can't comprehend that sentence, you have the mind of a fucking toddler.Fucking moron, I never said the protest caused the attack.
I also noticed that you conveniently ignored the other FACT I pointed out that Obama (at the U.N. General Assembly) STILL made the claim it was sparked by a video AFTER the CIA confirmed it was a planned terrorist attack. I even posted his exact words, which you ignored because it proved you WRONG. You have no fucking credibility and your brain is the size of a fucking pea.
No, dumbfuck, I didn't say that either. See if you can pay attention.
Your words, dickwad.The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi
And again, you have no reading comprehension skills. Hillary told Chelsea in an email (while the attacks were happening) that it was a terrorist attack. And I proved to you that Obama continued to make the video claim at the U.N. General Assembly AFTER the CIA proved it was a terrorist attack. You stated that the CIA "changed it's assessment about the video claim on September 24, 2012". And I posted the quote of Obama doubling down on the claim at the General Assembly on September 25, 2012. You wanna see the entire speech?You falsely claimed Hillary and Obama lied about the video and I proved to you they didn't lie.
Dumbfuck, is English your third language?No, dumbfuck, I didn't say that either. See if you can pay attention.Your words, dickwad.The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi
And again, you have no reading comprehension skills. Hillary told Chelsea in an email (while the attacks were happening) that it was a terrorist attack. And I proved to you that Obama continued to make the video claim at the U.N. General Assembly AFTER the CIA proved it was a terrorist attack. You stated that the CIA "changed it's assessment about the video claim on September 24, 2012". And I posted the quote of Obama doubling down on the claim at the General Assembly on September 25, 2012. You wanna see the entire speech?You falsely claimed Hillary and Obama lied about the video and I proved to you they didn't lie.
Remarks by the President to the UN General Assembly
I guess that proves you're full of shit as well as a blatant fucking liar.