Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.The court doesn't get to fucking decide that. Insurrection is a crime, which requires a criminal conviction, not some judges deciding it's so.
In insurrection a crime yes or no?
Does it being a crime require conviction to be considered guilty of it, yes or no?
Is it a level of crime requiring a Jury of ones peers, as required by the Constitution to be convicted, yes or no?
I am a zero time Biden voter. Did not even vote for him as VP.
what else do you have?
If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.
So the courts get to decide.
If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.
So the courts get to decide.
Jefferson Davis was never convicted of insurrection.It's implied when they reference the crime of Insurrection, and crimes require other procedures such as trials, juries and convictions.
Is Insurrection a crime, yes or no?
Answer the question.
lol, sure. When they say they’re “looking into it”, that’s intended to make low information voters think theyre doing something when they aren’t because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.Yup, Texas is already looking at removing Biden from the ballot next year.
You did that!
Um, no, they are very specific charges over a very specific event.No, they are jokes. Every one of them. Under the Colorado argument, anyone can be removed for virtually ANYTHING.
Except Biden is doing things about the border, it's just that our immigration system is broken, and Abbot pulling stunts like busing people all over the country with no warning doesn't help.So, the fact that Biden refuses to do anything about the border is de facto treason, and 32 states run by Repubs can remove Biden from the ballot.
It will be interesting to see which way the rule.
If it is overturned is it due to the 14th not applying to the office of president or due to a lack of a criminal conviction.
The ruling said he "incited an insurrection." Please link to any official ruling that there was an insurrection to begin with and then we can discuss it. Otherwise, if there was no insurrection, how can anyone be guilty of inciting one, in spite of the fact that no one was charged with or convicted of insurrection. Try again.Where does the text say he needs to be charged with insurrection?
As it was when CO tried it, eh?because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.
All of this because many of the politicians are in the globalist and owe elites allegiance camp. The young people are ph uked.lol, sure. When they say they’re “looking into it”, that’s intended to make low information voters think theyre doing something when they aren’t because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.
Trump said it all the time.
The ruling that said he incited an insurrection is an official ruling saying there was an insurrection.The ruling said he "incited an insurrection." Please link to any official ruling that there was an insurrection to begin with and then we can discuss it.
No, more like as stupid as when Texas petitioned the Supreme Court to take away the electoral votes of other states.As it was when CO tried it, eh?
Sure, in your dreams. A court two thousand miles from the jurisdiction where a supposed insurrection was rumored to have occurred determines it was an insurrection. You're extremely misinformed. No court in DC--the jurisdiction where you have fabricated this fantasy--has determined or convicted anyone of insurrection. No insurrection occurred moron. I will be sure to find you and let you eat copious amounts of crow when the SCOTUS overrules this idiocy. Bon apetit.The ruling that said he incited an insurrection is an official ruling saying there was an insurrection.
You didnt really think this one through, did you.
NOPE. We've been calling you kids "banana republicans" for a reason.Now That Democrats Have Made Us a Banana Republic
Do you understand jurisdiction? Clearly not. Crimes are not dreamed up in the minds of judges. They have to be charged, moron. What shithouse lawyering school awarded you a law degree?You didnt really think this one through, did you.
I don’t think you understand what “eat crow” means.Sure, in your dreams. A court two thousand miles from the jurisdiction where a supposed insurrection was rumored to have occurred determines it was an insurrection. You're extremely misinformed. No court in DC--the jurisdiction where you have fabricated this fantasy--has determined or convicted anyone of insurrection. No insurrection occurred moron. I will be sure to find you and let you eat copious amounts of crow when the SCOTUS overrules this idiocy. Bon apetit.
Yes, I understand jursidiction. The Supreme Court of Colorado has jurisdiction when it comes to who shows up on state ballots.Do you understand jurisdiction? Clearly not. Crimes are not dreamed up in the minds of judges. They have to be charged, moron. What shithouse lawyering school awarded you a law degree?
Made up crap does not hold up in court.We all know Biden is corrupt…
No, you've just tried to justify a ruling that is clearly STOOOOPID. Stupid is as stupid does.I have never said that SCOTUS will uphold the decision.
