Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Other than the fact that ALL government emails belong to 'we the people' and the only reason to use a private server is to circumvent those FOIA laws. I report factual information. You on the other hand spew nothing but propaganda which is the very definition of ignorance. As far as insults go, I only insult those who insult me, and your BS posts are an insult to anyone with a brain...which once again, leaves you out.
You think too highly of yourself, the delusion that she used a personal server to avoid FOIA is convenient for you but certainly not the sole reason. If you have ever worked with government email you will quickly find that government systems are ancient, slow, require a special client, are not web-accessible, drop random messages, send you literally hundreds of useless messages every week, are virtually impossible to configure into something more useful and most likely will block any message sent to family members or friends. Remember this is 2009, we are talking about and is also the most likely reason Karl Rove and many others did the very same thing and not a single person within the Republican Party, Congress, or right wing nut group ever made a peep about it.
The alternate view that if you want to get work done in government you set up your own server. That is why private servers proliferate, people want to be successful in their careers.
As to the last line in your screech, your arguments would be a lot more effective if they were in any way accurate or intelligent. You also might try wiping off the viscid slobber of biased drivel.
I agree. She also wanted to hide her illegal dealings with good old Syd Blumenthal, you know the trusted Clinton operative who is so bad that even Obama prohibited hilary from giving him a position at the State Dept.
Basically all you're doing is showing how her use of a private server for EVERYTHING was purely for her to hide her illegal activities from the American Public. Thanks for giving us the opportunity o show just what a conniving scumbag she is!
Maybe the Republican party learned something from that when they conveniently lost 22 million emails the American public should have been able to scrutinize.
Hmmm, the "party" lost them.....Not one of the highest placed government officials. The "party" a non governmental PRIVATE entity, lost their emails......and this compares to GOVERNMENT documents that technically belong to we the people...how?
You're flailing now dude....just sayin...
Wow, you are really showing your gross ignorance on this subject. Why don't you read up and we can talk about without all your lousy suppositions,
You think too highly of yourself, the delusion that she used a personal server to avoid FOIA is convenient for you but certainly not the sole reason. If you have ever worked with government email you will quickly find that government systems are ancient, slow, require a special client, are not web-accessible, drop random messages, send you literally hundreds of useless messages every week, are virtually impossible to configure into something more useful and most likely will block any message sent to family members or friends. Remember this is 2009, we are talking about and is also the most likely reason Karl Rove and many others did the very same thing and not a single person within the Republican Party, Congress, or right wing nut group ever made a peep about it.
The alternate view that if you want to get work done in government you set up your own server. That is why private servers proliferate, people want to be successful in their careers.
As to the last line in your screech, your arguments would be a lot more effective if they were in any way accurate or intelligent. You also might try wiping off the viscid slobber of biased drivel.
I agree. She also wanted to hide her illegal dealings with good old Syd Blumenthal, you know the trusted Clinton operative who is so bad that even Obama prohibited hilary from giving him a position at the State Dept.
Basically all you're doing is showing how her use of a private server for EVERYTHING was purely for her to hide her illegal activities from the American Public. Thanks for giving us the opportunity o show just what a conniving scumbag she is!
Maybe the Republican party learned something from that when they conveniently lost 22 million emails the American public should have been able to scrutinize.
Hmmm, the "party" lost them.....Not one of the highest placed government officials. The "party" a non governmental PRIVATE entity, lost their emails......and this compares to GOVERNMENT documents that technically belong to we the people...how?
You're flailing now dude....just sayin...
Wow, you are really showing your gross ignorance on this subject. Why don't you read up and we can talk about without all your lousy suppositions,
As soon as you post something that is not an establishment talking point I will be happy to engage you. So far all you have presented are non sequiturs, innuendo, outright fabrication, and of course personal attack. Like I said before, you get what you give and so far you have been just spewing shit.
I agree. She also wanted to hide her illegal dealings with good old Syd Blumenthal, you know the trusted Clinton operative who is so bad that even Obama prohibited hilary from giving him a position at the State Dept.
Basically all you're doing is showing how her use of a private server for EVERYTHING was purely for her to hide her illegal activities from the American Public. Thanks for giving us the opportunity o show just what a conniving scumbag she is!
Maybe the Republican party learned something from that when they conveniently lost 22 million emails the American public should have been able to scrutinize.
Hmmm, the "party" lost them.....Not one of the highest placed government officials. The "party" a non governmental PRIVATE entity, lost their emails......and this compares to GOVERNMENT documents that technically belong to we the people...how?
You're flailing now dude....just sayin...
Wow, you are really showing your gross ignorance on this subject. Why don't you read up and we can talk about without all your lousy suppositions,
As soon as you post something that is not an establishment talking point I will be happy to engage you. So far all you have presented are non sequiturs, innuendo, outright fabrication, and of course personal attack. Like I said before, you get what you give and so far you have been just spewing shit.
Establishment talking point? all I have alleged throughout this thread is that Trump should make good on his promise and that a candidate for the highest office in America should demonstrate by example that he is who he says he is.
There is absolutely no talking point in that. Keeping your word is the very bedrock of trust and the foundation of respect and integrity. Without that, he isn't worthy of the role of president period.
For the record, you were the one who led with personal attacks in our conversations and I am very happy to respond in kind.
Maybe the Republican party learned something from that when they conveniently lost 22 million emails the American public should have been able to scrutinize.
Hmmm, the "party" lost them.....Not one of the highest placed government officials. The "party" a non governmental PRIVATE entity, lost their emails......and this compares to GOVERNMENT documents that technically belong to we the people...how?
You're flailing now dude....just sayin...
Wow, you are really showing your gross ignorance on this subject. Why don't you read up and we can talk about without all your lousy suppositions,
As soon as you post something that is not an establishment talking point I will be happy to engage you. So far all you have presented are non sequiturs, innuendo, outright fabrication, and of course personal attack. Like I said before, you get what you give and so far you have been just spewing shit.
Establishment talking point? all I have alleged throughout this thread is that Trump should make good on his promise and that a candidate for the highest office in America should demonstrate by example that he is who he says he is.
There is absolutely no talking point in that. Keeping your word is the very bedrock of trust and the foundation of respect and integrity. Without that, he isn't worthy of the role of president period.
For the record, you were the one who led with personal attacks in our conversations and I am very happy to respond in kind.
You mean like hilary? She has yet to do as she says. Every action she makes is geared towards enriching her and her family. Like I said you hurl nothing but talking points and turn a blind eye to your candidates very obvious criminal behavior. You're a propagandist and nothing else.
Hmmm, the "party" lost them.....Not one of the highest placed government officials. The "party" a non governmental PRIVATE entity, lost their emails......and this compares to GOVERNMENT documents that technically belong to we the people...how?
You're flailing now dude....just sayin...
Wow, you are really showing your gross ignorance on this subject. Why don't you read up and we can talk about without all your lousy suppositions,
As soon as you post something that is not an establishment talking point I will be happy to engage you. So far all you have presented are non sequiturs, innuendo, outright fabrication, and of course personal attack. Like I said before, you get what you give and so far you have been just spewing shit.
Establishment talking point? all I have alleged throughout this thread is that Trump should make good on his promise and that a candidate for the highest office in America should demonstrate by example that he is who he says he is.
There is absolutely no talking point in that. Keeping your word is the very bedrock of trust and the foundation of respect and integrity. Without that, he isn't worthy of the role of president period.
For the record, you were the one who led with personal attacks in our conversations and I am very happy to respond in kind.
You mean like hilary? She has yet to do as she says. Every action she makes is geared towards enriching her and her family. Like I said you hurl nothing but talking points and turn a blind eye to your candidates very obvious criminal behavior. You're a propagandist and nothing else.
I believe that you may be the propagandist here because I haven't mentioned her name a single time in this thread nor have I indicated that she is my candidate. The subject is Trump and if you have trouble staying with the subject, you can always create another thread to address your issues.
