JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #301
Redfish has floundered (heh heh) throughout this thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Before 1964, the Southern faction of the democrat party was entirely racist. The Northern faction, not so much. But the Northern faction still had to kiss up to the Southern faction to win any national elections and to get anything done
When you looked at how the North reacted to integration in the 1970's, I think you'll see that they were just as racist as the South.
The most racist guy I've EVER met was a Chicago Democrat who'd moved to Michigan and worked on the assembly line for GM.
Yea, let's just not talk about history. It is much better to carry on with your preconceived notions.
Quiet you. White men had plenty access to vote, black people were being oppressed, .
Wrong, read about the ironclad oath. Many confederate veterans couldn't vote(including my ancestors), and black republicans had power in several southern states during reconstruction. The Klan fought for the rights of disenfranchised southern voters. They were necessary in restoring the voting rights of many southerners and won in the end, driving out the occupying Federal Troops in 1878. The first Klan was one of the most successful guerilla/ dissident political organizations in history.
Redfish has floundered (heh heh) throughout this thread.
The gop once supported soc sec and medicare though.
who said they were the same individuals? just the same party
So you're admitting that there is no real connection between modern day Democrats and some people who called themselves Democrats in the 1860's.
Good for you. Now tell us the point of your thread.
point of the thread? that throughout the history of this nation the democrat party has been the party of racism, hatred, and discrimination. It continues today, but in more subtle ways than lynchings. Democrat oppression of minorities by making them dependent on government handouts i.e. virtual slaves to the govt masta, may not be as bad as actual slavery, but its close.
The gop once supported soc sec and medicare though.
You don't know your history.
Uh yeah, I do. What you're advocating for is the eradication of African Americans. You are a flaming racist.
If it were 1861 and your state were debating whether or not to secede and join the Confederacy,
which side would you be on?
So you're admitting that there is no real connection between modern day Democrats and some people who called themselves Democrats in the 1860's.
Good for you. Now tell us the point of your thread.
Game, Set, Match, Carbineer.
not even close, fluke. he didn't even score a point, its 6-0, 6-0 redfish.
What does the Republican Party of 150 years ago have to do with the Republican Party of today?
Well, plenty. Both of them advocated limited government, (Jeffersonian concept) and individual liberty. Believe it or not they advocate racial equality, same as the party of old.
I certainly do, hence my reaction to Iceman.
We are the party of the Constitution, the solemn compact which confirms our God-given individual rights and assures that all Americans stand equal before the law.
...
In the spirit of the Constitution, we consider discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability, or national origin unacceptable and immoral. We will strongly enforce antidiscrimination statutes and ask all to join us in rejecting the forces of hatred and bigotry and in denouncing all who practice or promote racism, anti- Semitism, ethnic prejudice, or religious intolerance.
-2012 Republican Platform
Redfish has floundered (heh heh) throughout this thread.
The lure of rightwing mythology has hooked many a sucker. lol
The gop once supported soc sec and medicare though.
Now conservatives believe that providing affordable healthcare to the elderly enslaves them on some plantation of the elderly,
or something.
It's great that the inmates in this thread have had to resort to calling Jefferson Davis a liberal in order to try to make their myth work.
More than I could ever have hoped for.
13th amendment: abolished slavery
100% republican support, 23% democrat support
14th amendment: gave citizenship to freed slaves
94% republican support, 0% democrat support
15th amendment: right to vote for all
100% republican support, 0% democrat support
Obamacare
0% republican support
100% democrat support
Need I say more?![]()
The gop once supported soc sec and medicare though.
Now conservatives believe that providing affordable healthcare to the elderly enslaves them on some plantation of the elderly,
or something.
Quiet you. White men had plenty access to vote, black people were being oppressed, .
Wrong, read about the ironclad oath. Many confederate veterans couldn't vote(including my ancestors), and black republicans had power in several southern states during reconstruction. The Klan fought for the rights of disenfranchised southern voters. They were necessary in restoring the voting rights of many southerners and won in the end, driving out the occupying Federal Troops in 1878. The first Klan was one of the most successful guerilla/ dissident political organizations in history.
The KKK was responsible for that. Exactly. They oppressed black voters, that in turn led to the Democratic white segregationists taking over the south for a great deal of a century. So, what of the night riders who forced black republicans to vote for democrats or face the consequences? Hmm? They spent the majority of their time disenfranchising black and white voters alike!
I know my history, yours is revisionist history.
So you're admitting that there is no real connection between modern day Democrats and some people who called themselves Democrats in the 1860's.
Good for you. Now tell us the point of your thread.
point of the thread? that throughout the history of this nation the democrat party has been the party of racism, hatred, and discrimination. It continues today, but in more subtle ways than lynchings. Democrat oppression of minorities by making them dependent on government handouts i.e. virtual slaves to the govt masta, may not be as bad as actual slavery, but its close.
So giving Medicaid to sick children is just a subtle way of lynching them.
Tell us, how would those poor children (most of whom are white btw) be better off if they were forced to go without medical treatment for lack of government help to pay for it?
Explain that in detail, and as coherently as you can given your limitations.
It's great that the inmates in this thread have had to resort to calling Jefferson Davis a liberal in order to try to make their myth work.
More than I could ever have hoped for.
We learned on other threads that Susan B Anthony was a staunch Conservative as well. The right wing is so ashamed of itself that it's trying to import liberals and claim them as their own. It if were not such a nakedly sad display of intellecutual dishonesty, it would be funny to watch.