Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[easyt65]

Well you stupid fuckwad, first off who is Juliani? Second of all they don’t have to testify to set anything straight. Trump released the transcript and you morons can’t prove anything you’re claiming. Burden of proof is on you and you failed. Boo hoo, Trump is doing what he is legally entitled to do. Sucks when you have to obey the law doesn’t it?

Ant knows not one single 'witness' the Democrats called were part of the Phone call between Trump and the Ukraine PM, that the ONLY one who were part of it - to include the transcript - have revealed / shown that EVERYTHING the Democrats have accused the President of doing NEVER HAPPENED!

Claiming otherwise is like putting that false accusation in one hand, crapping in the other hand, putting their hands together, and what have you got?! SH!T! All the Democrats have is SH!T!

 

[AntonToo]

You mean like Hunter Biden cashing in on Ukraine cash when his daddy controlled US foreign aid to The Ukraine?

Ant knows damn-well that Schiff's own State Department witness during his failed committee coup hearings testified that Burisma reps were showing up pressuring them for a meeting with VP Biden while dropping Hunter's name.

...it's Joe's and Hunter's fault that someone mentioned him?

Why don't you go find ACTUAL evidence of improper conduct by Bidens and then we could have something to discuss.

 

[Nostra]

Cryin' Chucky is nothing more than a juror in this.

Jurors don't get to call witnesses.

 

[easyt65]

Yea, just like that, except here circumstatial evidence is just the tip of the iceberg.

If Democrats had any evidence we would have seen it 3 1/2 years ago!
If Democrats had any evidence Schiff would not have had to lie for over 2 years falsely claiming he had any.
If Democrats had any evidence Schiff would not have had to try to pass his personally-authored fictional 'Parody' off as 'evidence'

ZERO crime
ZERO evidence of a crime
ZERO witnesses.
ZERO videotaped confessions, like the one that Joe Biden made!

 

[AntonToo]

Yea, just like that, except here circumstatial evidence is just the tip of the iceberg.

If Democrats had any evidence we would have seen it 3 1/2 years ago!

These events took place this year, how the fuck would anyone have evidence of it 3 1/2 years ago?

You are a total idiot.

 

[easyt65]

...it's Joe's and Hunter's fault that someone mentioned him?

Xude, are you REALLY that f*ing stupid or intentionally deceitful?

The State Department has records of these meetings with Burisma and have already released / exposed it. The photos of Joe and Hunter playing golf with Burisma Reps after Joe said he never met with them, Joe Biden's videotaped confession....?!

Just stop - you're embarrassing yourself.

 

[Olde Europe]

‘Mutually Assured Destruction’: McConnell, WH Privately At Odds Over Senate Trial
'Mutually Assured Destruction': McConnell, WH Privately At Odds Over Senate Trial

Trump wants a real trial. He still thinks he didn't do anything wrong.

McTreason knows better. He wants a show trial, little to no evidence, an acquittal, and to move on with his agenda of blocking every bill the House passes.

Trump doesn't want a "real trial". He wants the Bidens smeared, and the whistleblower exposed for a treasonous criminal, and none of those with first-hand knowledge ever getting near the Senate.

McConnell doesn't want a show trial, which would be a lengthy, fiery, attention-gripping affair. He wants it boring but neat, short, resulting in a very predictable vote, and then move on to celebrate the acquittal until election day.

 

[easyt65]

These events took place this year, how the fuck would anyone have evidence of it 3 1/2 years ago? You are a total idiot.

YOU are the f*ing joke, Ant......




Your turn - show me YOUR evidence. Post the video of Trump confessing to black-mailing the Ukraine PM like Joe does here above!

Yeah, I thought so.

 

[AntonToo]

...it's Joe's and Hunter's fault that someone mentioned him?

Xude, are you REALLY that f*ing stupid or intentionally deceitful?

The State Department has records of these meetings with Burisma and have already released / exposed it. The photos of Joe and Hunter playing golf with Burisma Reps after Joe said he never met with them, Joe Biden's videotaped confession....?!

Just stop - you're embarrassing yourself.

Idiot, there is nothing inherently inapropriate about about Burisma reps having a meeting with DoS.

If you have something ACTAULLY INAPROPRIATE coming from Bidens go ahead and link to it.

 

[SAYIT]

Now maybe Mulvaney can clear all this up in his testimony before Congress... but for some reason, unlike Democrats, Trump and Republicans DON'T WANT HIM TO.

I'm not a Repub but based on the arrogant, un-American, Hysterical House Dem's words and actions, I don't want anyone to give them the friggin' time of day. No one elected them POTUS or Kings & Queens of the Universe and they had the opportunity to press their subpoenas in court where conflicts between the other 2 branches of gov't are settled. They chose this impeachment farce because their butts and your butt still hurt bigly over Shrillary's epic defeat. They also had their chance to pursue your impeachment fantasy but instead chose to punt and McConnell has announced that the Senate will not be doing their dirty work.

The House has tried to make its lame case, now they must prove it in a trial. Good luck with that.

 

[AntonToo]

These events took place this year, how the fuck would anyone have evidence of it 3 1/2 years ago? You are a total idiot.

YOU are the f*ing joke, Ant......



Your turn - show me YOUR evidence. Post the video of Trump confessing to black-mailing the Ukraine PM like Joe does here above!

Yeah, I thought so.

In that video Biden talks about how he got Shokin fired for not doing his damn job of prosecuting corruption in Ukraine. What is that evidence of if not GOOD FOREIGN POLICY?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Still claiming that the sleaziest politician to "grace" this country in many decades didn't know that Fusion GPS was cooking up a smear job on her political opponent?

Steele did not know who GPS' client was.

The DNC did not know Steele was doing the research or what sources he was using.

Trump is by far the sleaziest politician to disgrace this country.

Anything else?

Jealous?

 

[AntonToo]

Now maybe Mulvaney can clear all this up in his testimony before Congress... but for some reason, unlike Democrats, Trump and Republicans DON'T WANT HIM TO.

I'm not a Repub but based on the arrogant, un-American, Hysterical House Dem's words and actions, I don't want anyone to give them the friggin' time of day. No one elected them POTUS or Kings & Queens of the Universe and they had the opportunity to press their subpoenas in court where conflicts between the other 2 branches of gov't are settled. They chose this impeachment farce because their butts and your butt still hurt bigly over Shrillary's epic defeat. They also had their chance to pursue your impeachment fantasy but instead chose to punt and McConnell has announced that the Senate will not be doing their dirty work.

The House has tried to make its lame case, now they must prove it in a trial. Good luck with that.

I'm not hearing a single word in what you said explaining why directly involved people like Mulveney and Jiuliani SHOULD NOT come testify and clear the whole thing up.

Don't you want Democrats and their impeachment effort embarassed by a clear explaination to the American people what exactly happened and how Trump actually did nothing wrong?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

Schumer is wanting the Senate to do what the house should have done. Produce evidence of a crime.

an impeachment is strictly political - it's not a criminal trial.

but why would stupid ass rw's give a fuk about that.

It's not up to the Jury to look for more evidence

 

[SAYIT]

You mean like Hunter Biden cashing in on Ukraine cash when his daddy controlled US foreign aid to The Ukraine?

Yea, just like that, except the circumstatial evidence is way more direct and is just the tip of the iceberg.

Sorry killa but all that silly hearsay and opinion you swallowed the last 2 months and all the BS your media has shoveled into your mouth will not be admissible. Perhaps you should turn over all that direct "circumstatial [sic] evidence" to Fat J-Nads. He needs something to make his impeachment-lite case.

I realize your butt still hurts but as a booby-prize you get 3 hilarious minutes of "we got him now, kids." Enjoy:

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

Schumer is wanting the Senate to do what the house should have done. Produce evidence of a crime.

They did produce evidence. They just couldn't produce all the evidence...........due to Trump's illegal obstruction of a congressional investigation. That's the evidence Schumer wants on the record.

They've produced no evidence nor is it up to the Jury to look for more evidence.

 

[Siete]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

Schumer is wanting the Senate to do what the house should have done. Produce evidence of a crime.

an impeachment is strictly political - it's not a criminal trial.

but why would stupid ass rw's give a fuk about that.

It's not up to the Jury to look for more evidence

there aint no jury u f'n DUMBASS !

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

Schumer is wanting the Senate to do what the house should have done. Produce evidence of a crime.

an impeachment is strictly political - it's not a criminal trial.

but why would stupid ass rw's give a fuk about that.

It's not up to the Jury to look for more evidence

there aint no jury u f'n DUMBASS !

The Senate you dumbfuck is the jury.

 

[SAYIT]

Now maybe Mulvaney can clear all this up in his testimony before Congress... but for some reason, unlike Democrats, Trump and Republicans DON'T WANT HIM TO.

I'm not a Repub but based on the arrogant, un-American, Hysterical House Dem's words and actions, I don't want anyone to give them the friggin' time of day. No one elected them POTUS or Kings & Queens of the Universe and they had the opportunity to press their subpoenas in court where conflicts between the other 2 branches of gov't are settled. They chose this impeachment farce because their butts and your butt still hurt bigly over Shrillary's epic defeat. They also had their chance to pursue your impeachment fantasy but instead chose to punt and McConnell has announced that the Senate will not be doing their dirty work.

The House has tried to make its lame case, now they must prove it in a trial. Good luck with that.

I'm not hearing a single word in what you said explaining why directly involved people like Mulveney and Jiuliani SHOULD NOT come testify and clear the whole thing up.

Don't you want Democrats and their impeachment effort embarassed by a clear explaination to the American people what exactly happened and how Trump actually did nothing wrong?

Here's a clue 'cause you so desperately need one: no POTUS can conduct the biz of America - and he is our CEO - on live TV. What inside people know falls clearly under the scope of executive and/or attorney-client privilege which is exactly what anyone with a lick of integrity would claim under oath.
Read this again:
No one elected our Hysterical House Dems POTUS or Kings & Queens of the Universe and they had the opportunity to press their subpoenas in court where conflicts between the other 2 branches of gov't are settled. They chose this hyper-partisan impeachment farce because their butts and your butt still hurt bigly over Shrillary's epic defeat. They also had their chance to pursue your impeachment fantasy but instead chose to punt and McConnell has announced that the Senate will not be doing their dirty work.

Life's not fair? Tough shit, Snowflake.

 

[Siete]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

Schumer is wanting the Senate to do what the house should have done. Produce evidence of a crime.

an impeachment is strictly political - it's not a criminal trial.

but why would stupid ass rw's give a fuk about that.

It's not up to the Jury to look for more evidence

there aint no jury u f'n DUMBASS !

The Senate you dumbfuck is the jury.

theres no jury, senate or otherwise -

youre a f'n IDIOT.