Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,063
- 17,045
- Thread starter
- #481
no it’s not, it’s all thereNo, your question was literally “how have things escalated” and I told you how. It’s called giving a direct answer. Try it sometime.Escalation was reacting to an embassy attack with a drone bomb double kill involving a high ranking Iranian official which then prompted 4000 troops to be deployed, a stampede funeral where dozens died, the risk of losing our strategic position in the fight against ISIS, Missile strikes on our military bases wherein a commercial flight was shot down and nearly 200 innocent people died.i did hear that... it was super vague and didn’t make sense given the situation... was the strike on Soleimani a planned response to counter Iran’s raid of our embassy? Or Was it an imminent attack our intel agencies found out about that warranted immediate action?
Ok, let’s just cut through the crap and lay out what I think is obvious.
Trump was presented with many options on ways we could respond to the embassy attack. This hit on Soleimani was one of the options and was the one Trump went with. They then messed up by calling it an imminent attack which they said to try and excuse the fact that Trump acted without consulting congress.
Now the admin is in cover our ass mode which is why the story keeps changing. They aren’t being honest and straight forward about actions that are escalating armed conflict and risking lives.
do you have any proof they messed up by calling it an imminent attack???
in other words do you have proof there wasnt one??
and when did the story change??
and how have things escalated??? so far they have gone the other direction,,,
that’s the escalation and there are promises of more to come. Pay better attention
thats a small part of why,,,my question is why do you ignore so much of the rest of it???
but your explanation is lacking in facts,,,