The Republican/Conservative Misery Offensive.

Last edited:
No conservatives supported fascism. People who support fascism are fascists. Take the current crop of Democrats, for instance.

Fascism is a conservative ideology.

Wrong. NAZI economics were exactly the same as Pelosi economics.

It's a nexus of government, corporate interests and religion.

It's antithetical to Democracy.

Religion wasn't involved, and the word "nexus" is meaningless. It certainly isn't antithetical to democracy. Hitler attained office democratically. Fascism is where factory owners retain a bogus title that confers no rights, and government makes all the business decision. That's exactly the system that Democrats are driving us to.

Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:
 
Fascism is a conservative ideology.

Wrong. NAZI economics were exactly the same as Pelosi economics.

It's a nexus of government, corporate interests and religion.

It's antithetical to Democracy.

Religion wasn't involved, and the word "nexus" is meaningless. It certainly isn't antithetical to democracy. Hitler attained office democratically. Fascism is where factory owners retain a bogus title that confers no rights, and government makes all the business decision. That's exactly the system that Democrats are driving us to.

Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:

He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
 
Wrong. NAZI economics were exactly the same as Pelosi economics.



Religion wasn't involved, and the word "nexus" is meaningless. It certainly isn't antithetical to democracy. Hitler attained office democratically. Fascism is where factory owners retain a bogus title that confers no rights, and government makes all the business decision. That's exactly the system that Democrats are driving us to.

Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:

He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
 
Wrong. NAZI economics were exactly the same as Pelosi economics.



Religion wasn't involved, and the word "nexus" is meaningless. It certainly isn't antithetical to democracy. Hitler attained office democratically. Fascism is where factory owners retain a bogus title that confers no rights, and government makes all the business decision. That's exactly the system that Democrats are driving us to.

Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:

He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?

Erm no.

If he were a Austrian Christian Jew hater..that would make him a Nazi.
 
No conservatives supported fascism. People who support fascism are fascists. Take the current crop of Democrats, for instance.

Fascism is a conservative ideology.

Wrong. NAZI economics were exactly the same as Pelosi economics.

It's a nexus of government, corporate interests and religion.

It's antithetical to Democracy.

Religion wasn't involved, and the word "nexus" is meaningless. It certainly isn't antithetical to democracy. Hitler attained office democratically. Fascism is where factory owners retain a bogus title that confers no rights, and government makes all the business decision. That's exactly the system that Democrats are driving us to.

What the fuck are you talking about?

The Pope was involved in a Treaty with the Nazis.

And Hitler described himself as a Christian doing the Lord's work. And by "Lord" he meant his "savior" Jesus Christ.
 
Are we still debating the fact that millions are miserable because of Obamacare that the right gave us because the Heritage Foundation published some obscure paper on it (and the dems being brainless morons just did what it said to do) ?

Or the fact that our Social Security system has duped many of the elderly into living lives of squalor thinking that their government would "take care of them" ?

Or has Shallow finally admited that he's full of bull ?
 
Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:

He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
No answer? :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:
 
Obama sure is keeping Wall Street happy and insulated from Main Street's malaise. I hear the left likes that. :thup:

The private sector is growing. Your post is delusional.

No it is not.

Do the numbers "74,000" and "917,000" mean anything to you?

Economy added 74,000 jobs in weak December report; jobless rate down to 6.7% - WaPo
Yes, that means the private sector is still growing, which it hss for 46 consecutive months now, adding over 8 million jobs.

That's a failure to the brain-dead righties, right?
 
Are we still debating the fact that millions are miserable because of Obamacare that the right gave us because the Heritage Foundation published some obscure paper on it (and the dems being brainless morons just did what it said to do) ?

Or the fact that our Social Security system has duped many of the elderly into living lives of squalor thinking that their government would "take care of them" ?

Or has Shallow finally admited that he's full of bull ?

SSI didn't "dupe" the elderly into living lives of Squalor.

Even your hero Ayn Rand went on SSI.

And did it under an assumed name as to not show her hypocrisy.

:eusa_whistle:
 
Yeah, Hitler attained his office democratically .... if you consider him, as chancellor of Germany, changing the law upon President Hindenburg's death, transferring all of the president's power to himself as chancellor, establishing himself as the supreme ruler of Germany, democratic; then sure, it can be said that Hitler attained his office democratically. :eusa_doh:

He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
Hitler won the election of July 1932. I am not going to bother trying to explain the parliamentary system to the US publicly educated. If you can read:

German federal election, July 1932 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
Hitler won the election of July 1932. I am not going to bother trying to explain the parliamentary system to the US publicly educated. If you can read:

German federal election, July 1932 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seriously..

To say that election was free and fair..is laughable.

The Nazi party "won" because of intimidation and lies. Germany was also in a shambles.

You also should read your own links:

In March 1932, presidential elections pitted the incumbent Field Marshal Hindenburg, supported by pro-republican parties, against Hitler and the Communist candidate Ernst Thälmann. Hitler gained roughly a third of the vote and was thus defeated in the second round in April by Hindenburg, who gained a narrow majority.[1] However, after this victory Hindenburg increasingly moved towards the political right and at the end of May 1932 was persuaded to dismiss Brüning as Chancellor, replacing him with Franz von Papen (a renegade of the Centre Party) and a non-partisan "Cabinet of Barons". Papen's cabinet had almost no support in parliament and only three days after his appointment, when faced with this opposition, had the President dissolve the Reichstag and called for new elections, to be held on 31 July, so that the Reichstag could not dismiss him immediately.[2]

The election campaign took place under violent circumstances, as Papen lifted the token ban on the SA, the Nazi paramilitary, which Brüning had banned during the last days of his administration. This inevitably led to clashes with the Communist paramilitary. Note: The SA openly carried unsharpened Holbein style parade daggers to maintain compliance with an existing weapon law, while simultaneously using the appearance of an armed force for intimidation. The main purpose of such a strategy was to use Police manpower as a tool, by diverting their attention toward other partisans who armed themselves with functional weapons in response to the ploy, partly disrupting competitors efforts.

The elections resulted in great gains by the Nazi party, who with 230 seats for the first time became the largest party in parliament. Neither the Nazi Party nor President Hindenburg had a governing majority and the other parties refused cooperation. Neither side had a majority on its own and no coalition could be formed to create a governing majority.[2] Hence, Papen's minority government continued, leading to another election in November.
 
He attained the office of chancellor democratically, moron.

Obama has also assigned extra-constitutional powers to himself, so does that make him a NAZI?
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
Hitler won the election of July 1932. I am not going to bother trying to explain the parliamentary system to the US publicly educated. If you can read:

German federal election, July 1932 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Holyfuckingshit!

Your own link says ...

In March 1932, presidential elections pitted the incumbent Field Marshal Hindenburg, supported by pro-republican parties, against Hitler and the Communist candidate Ernst Thälmann. Hitler gained roughly a third of the vote and was thus defeated in the second round in April by Hindenburg, who gained a narrow majority.[1]

epic-fail.jpg


His party won a plurality (not even a majority) in the Reichstag, but Hitler lost the election.

Hitler never won an election, yet declared himself the supreme ruler of Germany when the president died.
 
Hitler never won an election. So how the fuck did he attain his position as supreme leader of Germany, democratically? :eusa_doh:
Hitler won the election of July 1932. I am not going to bother trying to explain the parliamentary system to the US publicly educated. If you can read:

German federal election, July 1932 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Holyfuckingshit!

Your own link says ...

In March 1932, presidential elections pitted the incumbent Field Marshal Hindenburg, supported by pro-republican parties, against Hitler and the Communist candidate Ernst Thälmann. Hitler gained roughly a third of the vote and was thus defeated in the second round in April by Hindenburg, who gained a narrow majority.[1]

epic-fail.jpg


His party won a plurality (not even a majority) in the Reichstag, but Hitler lost the election.

Hitler never won an election, yet declared himself the supreme ruler of Germany when the president died.
OK, even a publicly educated moron must understand the difference between March and July. Again, you need to learn about the parliamentary system before you continue to make a fool of yourself.
 
Are we still debating the fact that millions are miserable because of Obamacare that the right gave us because the Heritage Foundation published some obscure paper on it (and the dems being brainless morons just did what it said to do) ?

Or the fact that our Social Security system has duped many of the elderly into living lives of squalor thinking that their government would "take care of them" ?

Or has Shallow finally admited that he's full of bull ?

SSI didn't "dupe" the elderly into living lives of Squalor.

Even your hero Ayn Rand went on SSI.

And did it under an assumed name as to not show her hypocrisy.

:eusa_whistle:

You bet it has.

Why else would Lizzy, "the liar", Warren be pushing for an expansion.

Who is Ayn Rand ?
 
Are we still debating the fact that millions are miserable because of Obamacare that the right gave us because the Heritage Foundation published some obscure paper on it (and the dems being brainless morons just did what it said to do) ?

Or the fact that our Social Security system has duped many of the elderly into living lives of squalor thinking that their government would "take care of them" ?

Or has Shallow finally admited that he's full of bull ?

SSI didn't "dupe" the elderly into living lives of Squalor.

Even your hero Ayn Rand went on SSI.

And did it under an assumed name as to not show her hypocrisy.

:eusa_whistle:

You bet it has.

Why else would Lizzy, "the liar", Warren be pushing for an expansion.

Who is Ayn Rand ?

:lol:

Next you'll be asking who is Brigham Young.
 
SSI didn't "dupe" the elderly into living lives of Squalor.

Even your hero Ayn Rand went on SSI.

And did it under an assumed name as to not show her hypocrisy.

:eusa_whistle:

You bet it has.

Why else would Lizzy, "the liar", Warren be pushing for an expansion.

Who is Ayn Rand ?

:lol:

Next you'll be asking who is Brigham Young.

3rd baseman for the Cubs last time they won the World Series?
 
We don't have to keep the misery going

After five frikken years the Community organize in Chief and his commie comrades in arms....we are living the misery
 
SSI didn't "dupe" the elderly into living lives of Squalor.

Even your hero Ayn Rand went on SSI.

And did it under an assumed name as to not show her hypocrisy.

:eusa_whistle:

You bet it has.

Why else would Lizzy, "the liar", Warren be pushing for an expansion.

Who is Ayn Rand ?

:lol:

Next you'll be asking who is Brigham Young.

Noticed you missed the question on Lizzy the liar.....
 
Hitler won the election of July 1932. I am not going to bother trying to explain the parliamentary system to the US publicly educated. If you can read:

German federal election, July 1932 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Holyfuckingshit!

Your own link says ...

In March 1932, presidential elections pitted the incumbent Field Marshal Hindenburg, supported by pro-republican parties, against Hitler and the Communist candidate Ernst Thälmann. Hitler gained roughly a third of the vote and was thus defeated in the second round in April by Hindenburg, who gained a narrow majority.[1]

epic-fail.jpg


His party won a plurality (not even a majority) in the Reichstag, but Hitler lost the election.

Hitler never won an election, yet declared himself the supreme ruler of Germany when the president died.
OK, even a publicly educated moron must understand the difference between March and July. Again, you need to learn about the parliamentary system before you continue to make a fool of yourself.

Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

To win an election, even in a parliamentary, a party must win a majority of seats. Otherwise, they still need to form a coalition with other parties. You don't win an election by having most people vote against your party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top