This New Trump Ad Is MAGA Fire 🔥

There is nothing wrong or illegal to appoint alternative electors in case the local election is overturned. JFK did it.

except for the FACT that georgia had THREE RECOUNTS... ALL resulting in dark brandon WINNING THE STATE.

Why Hawaii 1960 isn’t the same as Trump 2020​

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.
See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?​

Attorneys of outgoing chairman of the state’s GOP David Shafer argue that an “act of statesmanship” in Hawaii in 1960 is justification for Shafer’s 2020 decision to convene a meeting of “alternate” electors in favor of Donald Trump.​

June 14, 2023 •

Among the possible charges, some legal analysts say, are making false statements, forgery, racketeering or conspiracy to commit election fraud.

one of those observers said they viewed the comparison of Hawaii 1960 and Georgia in 2020 as specious.


“While it’s an interesting defense, it’s also a complete nonsensical one,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. “In Hawaii in 1960, there was a legitimate debate about who had won… and that was just not the case in Georgia.”

In Georgia, we didn’t “have the secretary of state saying there’s been a mistake and officially certifying two slates,” Gardner said. “What we have is one slate of (Democratic) electors that is selected and certified according to completely lawful processes and then another slate that appoints themselves an opposing slate and decides that they’re going to just show up and hope that the vice president acts illegally and counts their votes.”
Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?

:itsok:
 
except for the FACT that georgia had THREE RECOUNTS... ALL resulting in dark brandon WINNING THE STATE.

Why Hawaii 1960 isn’t the same as Trump 2020​

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.
See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?​

Attorneys of outgoing chairman of the state’s GOP David Shafer argue that an “act of statesmanship” in Hawaii in 1960 is justification for Shafer’s 2020 decision to convene a meeting of “alternate” electors in favor of Donald Trump.​

June 14, 2023 •

Among the possible charges, some legal analysts say, are making false statements, forgery, racketeering or conspiracy to commit election fraud.

one of those observers said they viewed the comparison of Hawaii 1960 and Georgia in 2020 as specious.


“While it’s an interesting defense, it’s also a complete nonsensical one,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. “In Hawaii in 1960, there was a legitimate debate about who had won… and that was just not the case in Georgia.”

In Georgia, we didn’t “have the secretary of state saying there’s been a mistake and officially certifying two slates,” Gardner said. “What we have is one slate of (Democratic) electors that is selected and certified according to completely lawful processes and then another slate that appoints themselves an opposing slate and decides that they’re going to just show up and hope that the vice president acts illegally and counts their votes.”
Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?

:itsok:
You can count illegal ballots as many times as you want.
 
"Cloned Voter Rolls" is a video at this link. Watch it . It will show you where the illegal votes come from and how organized the massive fraud is.

Phony registrations are created and made legal by assigning a voter number to them. These voters do not exist only their vote does. They are kept in a file where they can be accessed on command and used to win elections. This is backed by facts this lady already has. If you think it only goes in NY you are sadly mistaken.

The video is about 24 minutes. Do not reply if you do not watch it.

Do you think GA. And AZ. would like their voter rolls checked?
 
And it's truthful and to the point. It exposes the blatant hypocrisy of the left. This hypocrisy will be met with defiance this upcoming election. It's the only way to make America great again.



Al Gore accepted his court loss, and then as Vice President he certified the 2000 election.

Al Gore did NOT incite an insurrection.

Hillary Clinton conceded the day after the 2016 election.

Neither of the incitedm an insurrection or created illegal fake electors in seven states.

And that is why they were not prosecuted. And that is why Trump IS being prosecuted.

All caught up now, retard? Try to let those facts sink into your submissive parroting cuck head.
 
The question of why they weren't prosecuted is simple. They didn't plan and attempt a coup.

Actually they did, the created/paid for a false dossier (a lie) to be used as an excuse to 'investigate' a sitting president in an attempt to get him impeached and removed from office. Completely criminal and corrupt, and a far more valid 'coup' than anything that happened on 1/6. Yet not one of the traitors that attempted to pull that off were prosecuted or faced any recriminations, all because they have a "D" after their name.
 
Al Gore accepted his court loss, and then as Vice President he certified the 2000 election.

Al Gore did NOT incite an insurrection.

Hillary Clinton conceded the day after the 2016 election.

Neither of the incitedm an insurrection or created illegal fake electors in seven states.

And that is why they were not prosecuted. And that is why Trump IS being prosecuted.

All caught up now, retard? Try to let those facts sink into your submissive parroting cuck head.
Al Gore got an evidentiary hearing in the SCOTUS. Trump did not. You have no argument.
 
Actually they did, the created/paid for a false dossier (a lie) to be used as an excuse to 'investigate' a sitting president in an attempt to get him impeached and removed from office. Completely criminal and corrupt, and a far more valid 'coup' than anything that happened on 1/6. Yet not one of the traitors that attempted to pull that off were prosecuted or faced any recriminations, all because they have a "D" after their name.
Impeachment is not a coup. Are you really that confused?
 
"Cloned Voter Rolls" is a video at this link. Watch it . It will show you where the illegal votes come from and how organized the massive fraud is.

Phony registrations are created and made legal by assigning a voter number to them. These voters do not exist only their vote does. They are kept in a file where they can be accessed on command and used to win elections. This is backed by facts this lady already has. If you think it only goes in NY you are sadly mistaken.

The video is about 24 minutes. Do not reply if you do not watch it.

Do you think GA. And AZ. would like their voter rolls checked?
Fake news much?
 
Al Gore accepted his court loss, and then as Vice President he certified the 2000 election.

Al Gore did NOT incite an insurrection.

Hillary Clinton conceded the day after the 2016 election.

Neither of the incitedm an insurrection or created illegal fake electors in seven states.

And that is why they were not prosecuted. And that is why Trump IS being prosecuted.

All caught up now, retard? Try to let those facts sink into your submissive parroting cuck head.
Trump didn't incite an insurrection. Stop being delusional.
 

Forum List

Back
Top