TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 37,441
- 48,946
- 2,915
The Dirty Democratic Party colludes with the Press 24/7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His email has to do with his email? No duh!?Trump Jr's email has nothing to do with the Podesta emails posted on Wikileaks.No one asked the Russians for it, dumbass.Oh ok...Thats what I thought. So no one stole it and it was available everywhere....except you just had to ask the Russians for it. Is that it?
Let's clarify something for you right now: we're not pretending that your idiotic characterization of events is accurate. I only deal with what has actually been document, not your snowflake wet dreams.
Donald Trump Jr says they were looking for it. Is Donald Trump's email lying?
Next idiocy.
But they do have to do with his email and getting information on Hillary or was the email lying?
Yeah, we know he was interested on information about Hillary. So what? You're comparing things that aren't comparable.
Complain on a message boardObviously, not everything Trump is trying to do is bad for our Country. In fact, many things might be great, but, because the political machine is more worried about the "status quo" than us or our Country, we continue to pay the price for a corrupt Government.
Now, what can WE do about it?
1. No connection to Trump - No Evidence Against Trump.....But the facts
1. American intelligence finds Russians hacked our political organizations = ...no crimes?
2. one guilty plea and two indictments with more on the way = ...no crimes?
I agree whole-heartedly.There are laws covering treason, and they need enforced at present.
Ummm, ant....the President fired an FBI director:DIRECT CONNECTION TO TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
There is also a connection to Trump in the way he has fired FBI director ... You keep pleading nothing burgers, but there keeps being more and more burned meat smell here.
But then, that will mean that everybody will have to focus on Hillary's emails. We better find something else to turn everybody away from those emails. I don't see nor hear anybody focusing on locking Hillary up..THER IS NO STATUE / LAW COVERING ' COLLUSION'
'Collusion' is not a crime. It does not exist as a criminal offense. It is a made-up accusation created by the media with which to demonize / attack President Trump.
Donald Trump calling for the Russians to hack Hillary's server and reveal what was in her criminal server is NOT a crime.
Also, seeking out 'dirt' on a political opponent, even from a foreign agent / country, is NOT illegal. There is, of course, no evidence to support any claim the President Trump did so.
Some associated with his campaign seem to have dought out 'dirt' on Hillary; however, as D-Diane Feinstein admitted during an interview this week, there is no evidence to support the claim that these people coordinated with or have given Trump 'dirt' on Hillary.
Feinstein, Schumer, Watters, Pelosi, and other Democrats have teluctantly admitted this ... after a year of multiple investigations and a 'stacked' investigatin council plagued by conflicts of interests and members who already should have recused themselves from the investigation.
So...
1. 'Collusion' is not a crime. It is a creation by the Trump-hating liberal media.
2. President Trump nor anyone he is associated engaged in 'collusion', criminally collaborating with Russians.
Ummm, ant....the President fired an FBI director:DIRECT CONNECTION TO TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
There is also a connection to Trump in the way he has fired FBI director ... You keep pleading nothing burgers, but there keeps being more and more burned meat smell here.
- Admitted he leaked confidential information to the press / his friend in an attempt to get a Special Council appointed because he did not have the balls to do his job on his own
- Hid his belief that US AG Lynch Obstructed Justice in the Hillary Investigation...
- Admitted Hillary broke laws then refused to indict her, citing non-existent piss-poor excuses / lies for not doing so ('she did not know what she was doing' - NOT a legal defense for breaking laws)
- Was found to have written Hillary's exoneration prior to interviewing people / completing the investigation
- The President can fire 'anyone' he wants, and as the evidence shows he had more than enough evidence / reason to fire Comey.
Comey should be glad HE hasn't been indicted.
Again, ZERO EVIDENCE. Just more butt-hurt from the Left.
Absolutely right...but there is no ACTUAL evidence that he Obstructed Justice (like Comey and Lynch did), otherwise you snowflakes would have had the President Impeached and indicted by now.President has the POWER to fire FBI director, but he DOES NOT have the power to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.
Obviously, not everything Trump is trying to do is bad for our Country. In fact, many things might be great, but, because the political machine is more worried about the "status quo" than us or our Country, we continue to pay the price for a corrupt Government.
Now, what can WE do about it?
Looks like someone is still living in the past. But yeah, Trump is doing great in his Asia trip.
If by "great" you mean "going 3 days without horribly embarassing himself and this country", sure.
But give him time.
For the last 3 days, Trump has been droning written speeches that don't sound anything like Trump. He sounds like a kid forced to read an apology.
he's sounds freakin' medicated.
Generalizing is fun huh snowflake!
Absolutely right...but there is no ACTUAL evidence that he Obstructed Justice (like Comey and Lynch did), otherwise you snowflakes would have had the President Impeached and indicted by now.President has the POWER to fire FBI director, but he DOES NOT have the power to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.
Instead, a mountain of REAL evidence has been exposed against the Democrats...thanks to the Democrats and their witch hunt.
I know...everyone gets indicted right? I Mena who hasnt tried to get illegal information from the Kremlin before? That' just normal stuff!
How would any information from the Kremlin be illegal? Wouldn't that make Hillary's "dossier" illegal?
If you buy a car from a ford dealer, it's legal. You buy a car from a a chop shop with no VIN number, it's not.
Please cite the law that says it's illegel to receive information from the Kremlin. We already know auto theft is against the law.
Bob Mueller will decide which crimes to charge our treasonous president with. Not you.THER IS NO STATUE / LAW COVERING ' COLLUSION'
'Collusion' is not a crime. It does not exist as a criminal offense. It is a made-up accusation created by the media with which to demonize / attack President Trump.
Donald Trump calling for the Russians to hack Hillary's server and reveal what was in her criminal server is NOT a crime.
Also, seeking out 'dirt' on a political opponent, even from a foreign agent / country, is NOT illegal. There is, of course, no evidence to support any claim the President Trump did so.
Some associated with his campaign seem to have dought out 'dirt' on Hillary; however, as D-Diane Feinstein admitted during an interview this week, there is no evidence to support the claim that these people coordinated with or have given Trump 'dirt' on Hillary.
Feinstein, Schumer, Watters, Pelosi, and other Democrats have teluctantly admitted this ... after a year of multiple investigations and a 'stacked' investigatin council plagued by conflicts of interests and members who already should have recused themselves from the investigation.
So...
1. 'Collusion' is not a crime. It is a creation by the Trump-hating liberal media.
2. President Trump nor anyone he is associated engaged in 'collusion', criminally collaborating with Russians.
9 members of Trump's campaign met with Russians and then lied about it. Why did they meet with them?If Hillary had the exact same allegations and was being investigated by Mueller, your dumbass would create 5 threads a day about it.
More false accusations without evidence by liberals, motivated by emotion and partisanship.
Facts are not based on what party wields them. The fact that 'collusion' is not a crime does not depend on partisanship.
It is based on the fact that there is no law or statute that defines or makes 'collusion' a crime.
Hillary did not commit the crime of 'collusion' because 'collusion' is not a crime. It does not exist.
Please try to remove your emotion and partisanship from the discussion, and see the facts for what they are.
And his son.flynn is next.
tick tock.....