Today’s GOP - Censure Those Who Convicted Trump But Not Klan Leaders

Thread title. "GOP today"
O.P subject: A newspaper article from 1989.
Just like the fake impeachment evidence.
You've obviously missed the point.

But, you're a Trumpster, so we forgive you!

MAGA!

:hhello:
There is no point.

The O.P is asking why they are censuring the traitors today, but didn't (past tense) censure Duke over years ago.
It's like us asking why did Biden oppose Gay marriage. 10 years ago.
Things change and move on.

The funny thing is that they didn't censure Marjorie Greene but censured fully credentialed conservatives from their party for insufficiently supporting Trump.

Just goes to show, it's no longer the GoP but the MAGA.
 
Thread title. "GOP today"
O.P subject: A newspaper article from 1989.
Just like the fake impeachment evidence.
You've obviously missed the point.

But, you're a Trumpster, so we forgive you!

MAGA!

:hhello:
There is no point.

The O.P is asking why they are censuring the traitors today, but didn't (past tense) censure Duke over years ago.
It's like us asking why did Biden oppose Gay marriage. 10 years ago.
Things change and move on.

The funny thing is that they didn't censure Marjorie Greene but censured fully credentialed conservatives from their party for insufficiently supporting Trump.

Just goes to show, it's no longer the GoP but the MAGA.
Hallelujah.
 
That's where the GOP is right now.

I guess it has to hit rock bottom before it can turn around.
There may not be the kind of rock bottom for these people that forces one to reexamine their values.

Values and principles are not part of the current Republican Party goals. They seek:
  • Power
  • Corporate Dollars
  • Privatization
  • Rights for the few, not the many, including:
    • Suffrage (voter suppression)
    • Right-to-Work Laws ( prohibiting mandated union membership and dues)
    • Civil Rights for all, such as:
      • denying LGBTQ citizens from serving in our armed forces, &
      • denying them marriage
      • unequal sentencing laws for people of color
      • passing federal taxation laws which are regressive
  • Seek to pass "Jim Crow" type laws to deny or making it difficult to seek abortion
  • Remove small children from their parents for the sole purpose to punish persons seeking safety from poverty and criminal gangs in the Central & South American people and Mexican Families.
 
That's where the GOP is right now.

I guess it has to hit rock bottom before it can turn around.

Le6kTZc.gif


How many times does he have to denounce them, before you stop asking the question?

At what point will you stop smearing him/us with this shit?


It is not a real question. It is a propaganda smear.


People are dying in the streets and you are still fanning the flames.
 
That's where the GOP is right now.

I guess it has to hit rock bottom before it can turn around.
There may not be the kind of rock bottom for these people that forces one to reexamine their values.

Values and principles are not part of the current Republican Party goals. They seek:
  • Power
  • Corporate Dollars
  • ...


Wow. A political party seeks power? How dire. And shocking.

AND, on top of that they want money? OMG.


The Terror.


1613339482959.png
 
Is anyone really surprised?

View attachment 457050



David duke has never been accepted by the republican party......he has never been supported by the republican party, and has been actively denounced by the republican party since he first ran for office....

You got your David Duke history wrong. The only time he was able to successfully run for office was as a Republican.


And he won a tiny race, in a run off when he wasn't well known....and wasn't supported by the Republican party, you doofus........the party supported his opponents........

Duke first ran for the Louisiana Senate as a Democrat from a Baton Rouge district in 1975.
---
In October 1979, he ran as a Democrat for the 10th District Senate seat and finished second in a three-candidate race with 9,897 votes (26%).[31]
----
In 1988, Duke ran initially in the Democratic presidential primaries. His campaign had limited impact, with the only exception—winning the little-known New Hampshire vice presidential primary.[35] Duke, having failed to gain much traction as a Democrat, then sought and gained the presidential nomination of the Populist Party, an organization founded by Willis Carto.[36][37] He appeared on the ballot for president in 11 states and was a write-in candidate in some other states, some with Trenton Stokes of Arkansas for vice president, and on other state ballots with Floyd Parker, a physician from New Mexico,[38] for vice president. He received just 47,047 votes, for 0.04% of the national popular vote.[39]
---
In December 1988, Duke changed his political affiliation from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party.[40]

In 1988, Republican state representative Charles Cusimano of Metairie resigned his District 81 seat to become a 24th Judicial District Court judge, and a special election was called early in 1989 to select a successor. Duke entered the race to succeed Cusimano and faced several opponents, including fellow Republicans John Spier Treen, a brother of former governor David C. Treen; Delton Charles, a school board member; and Roger F. Villere Jr., who operates Villere's Florist in Metairie. Duke finished first in the primary with 3,995 votes (33.1%).[41] As no one received a majority of the vote in the first round, a runoff election was required between Duke and Treen, who polled 2,277 votes (18.9%) in the first round of balloting.


Treen's candidacy was endorsed by U.S. president George H. W. Bush, former president Ronald Reagan, and other prominent Republicans,[42] as well as Democrats Victor Bussie (president of the Louisiana AFL-CIO) and Edward J. Steimel (president of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry and former director of the "good government" think tank, the Public Affairs Research Council).


Duke, however, criticized Treen on a statement the latter had made indicating a willingness to entertain higher property taxes, anathema in that suburban district.[43] Duke, with 8,459 votes (50.7%), defeated Treen, who polled 8,232 votes (49.3%).[44] He served in the House from 1989 until 1992.[45]


Duke has never had any support from the Republican party...you doofus...unlike Robert Byrd.......who has been supported and praised by everyone in the democrat party...

Yhe only reason he won the run off race was over a tax increase issue and nothing to do with racism....you idiot..


Duke, however, criticized Treen on a statement the latter had made indicating a willingness to entertain higher property taxes, anathema in that suburban district.[43] Duke, with 8,459 votes (50.7%), defeated Treen, who polled 8,232 votes (49.3%).[44] He served in the House from 1989 until 1992.[45]

Republican VOTERS supported him.
 
Is anyone really surprised?

View attachment 457050



David duke has never been accepted by the republican party......he has never been supported by the republican party, and has been actively denounced by the republican party since he first ran for office....

You got your David Duke history wrong. The only time he was able to successfully run for office was as a Republican.


And he won a tiny race, in a run off when he wasn't well known....and wasn't supported by the Republican party, you doofus........the party supported his opponents........

Duke first ran for the Louisiana Senate as a Democrat from a Baton Rouge district in 1975.
---
In October 1979, he ran as a Democrat for the 10th District Senate seat and finished second in a three-candidate race with 9,897 votes (26%).[31]
----
In 1988, Duke ran initially in the Democratic presidential primaries. His campaign had limited impact, with the only exception—winning the little-known New Hampshire vice presidential primary.[35] Duke, having failed to gain much traction as a Democrat, then sought and gained the presidential nomination of the Populist Party, an organization founded by Willis Carto.[36][37] He appeared on the ballot for president in 11 states and was a write-in candidate in some other states, some with Trenton Stokes of Arkansas for vice president, and on other state ballots with Floyd Parker, a physician from New Mexico,[38] for vice president. He received just 47,047 votes, for 0.04% of the national popular vote.[39]
---
In December 1988, Duke changed his political affiliation from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party.[40]

In 1988, Republican state representative Charles Cusimano of Metairie resigned his District 81 seat to become a 24th Judicial District Court judge, and a special election was called early in 1989 to select a successor. Duke entered the race to succeed Cusimano and faced several opponents, including fellow Republicans John Spier Treen, a brother of former governor David C. Treen; Delton Charles, a school board member; and Roger F. Villere Jr., who operates Villere's Florist in Metairie. Duke finished first in the primary with 3,995 votes (33.1%).[41] As no one received a majority of the vote in the first round, a runoff election was required between Duke and Treen, who polled 2,277 votes (18.9%) in the first round of balloting.


Treen's candidacy was endorsed by U.S. president George H. W. Bush, former president Ronald Reagan, and other prominent Republicans,[42] as well as Democrats Victor Bussie (president of the Louisiana AFL-CIO) and Edward J. Steimel (president of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry and former director of the "good government" think tank, the Public Affairs Research Council).


Duke, however, criticized Treen on a statement the latter had made indicating a willingness to entertain higher property taxes, anathema in that suburban district.[43] Duke, with 8,459 votes (50.7%), defeated Treen, who polled 8,232 votes (49.3%).[44] He served in the House from 1989 until 1992.[45]


Duke has never had any support from the Republican party...you doofus...unlike Robert Byrd.......who has been supported and praised by everyone in the democrat party...

Yhe only reason he won the run off race was over a tax increase issue and nothing to do with racism....you idiot..


Duke, however, criticized Treen on a statement the latter had made indicating a willingness to entertain higher property taxes, anathema in that suburban district.[43] Duke, with 8,459 votes (50.7%), defeated Treen, who polled 8,232 votes (49.3%).[44] He served in the House from 1989 until 1992.[45]

Republican VOTERS supported him.



1613340584246.png
 
That's where the GOP is right now.

I guess it has to hit rock bottom before it can turn around.
There may not be the kind of rock bottom for these people that forces one to reexamine their values.

Values and principles are not part of the current Republican Party goals. They seek:
  • Power
  • Corporate Dollars
  • Privatization
  • Rights for the few, not the many, including:
    • Suffrage (voter suppression)
    • Right-to-Work Laws ( prohibiting mandated union membership and dues)
    • Civil Rights for all, such as:
      • denying LGBTQ citizens from serving in our armed forces, &
      • denying them marriage
      • unequal sentencing laws for people of color
      • passing federal taxation laws which are regressive
  • Seek to pass "Jim Crow" type laws to deny or making it difficult to seek abortion
  • Remove small children from their parents for the sole purpose to punish persons seeking safety from poverty and criminal gangs in the Central & South American people and Mexican Families.


Nothing you posted is true or accurate.....

The wealthiest people in this country are democrats....the corporations now support democrats since they want government to keep out the competition....

There is no voter suppression...requiring IDs to vote protects the vote, which is why you shitheads lie about it

Mandatory Union Membership? Belong or you can't work....? You think that makes sense? You truly are a fascist.

What unequal sentencing laws for people of color? Not happening.....actual research shows this isn't happening.

The only regressive taxes are tax increases passed by democrats....

Abortion kills human beings....

You understand that it was the left wing 9th circuit court of appeals that made it necessary to separate children from their parents when their parents broke the law and illegally entered the country...right? And that a vast number of the children separated from adults were children used by criminals to cross the border....and then sold into sex slavery or sweat shops...right? And it was obama that used cages to keep those kids...you got that...right?

You are an idiot.
 
Thread title. "GOP today"
O.P subject: A newspaper article from 1989.
Just like the fake impeachment evidence.
You've obviously missed the point.

But, you're a Trumpster, so we forgive you!

MAGA!

:hhello:
There is no point.

The O.P is asking why they are censuring the traitors today, but didn't (past tense) censure Duke over years ago.
It's like us asking why did Biden oppose Gay marriage. 10 years ago.
Things change and move on.

The funny thing is that they didn't censure Marjorie Greene but censured fully credentialed conservatives from their party for insufficiently supporting Trump.

Just goes to show, it's no longer the GoP but the MAGA.


Marjorie Greene said stupid things.....the moronic 7 violated their oaths of office......
 
Thread title. "GOP today"
O.P subject: A newspaper article from 1989.
Just like the fake impeachment evidence.
You've obviously missed the point.

But, you're a Trumpster, so we forgive you!

MAGA!

:hhello:
There is no point.

The O.P is asking why they are censuring the traitors today, but didn't (past tense) censure Duke over years ago.
It's like us asking why did Biden oppose Gay marriage. 10 years ago.
Things change and move on.

The funny thing is that they didn't censure Marjorie Greene but censured fully credentialed conservatives from their party for insufficiently supporting Trump.

Just goes to show, it's no longer the GoP but the MAGA.


Marjorie Greene said stupid things.....the moronic 7 violated their oaths of office......

How, specifically?
 
Thread title. "GOP today"
O.P subject: A newspaper article from 1989.
Just like the fake impeachment evidence.
You've obviously missed the point.

But, you're a Trumpster, so we forgive you!

MAGA!

:hhello:
There is no point.

The O.P is asking why they are censuring the traitors today, but didn't (past tense) censure Duke over years ago.
It's like us asking why did Biden oppose Gay marriage. 10 years ago.
Things change and move on.

The funny thing is that they didn't censure Marjorie Greene but censured fully credentialed conservatives from their party for insufficiently supporting Trump.

Just goes to show, it's no longer the GoP but the MAGA.


Marjorie Greene said stupid things.....the moronic 7 violated their oaths of office......

How, specifically?


They voted to impeach a man who was no longer President and who did not commit any crime...in fact, he was exercising his legal Rights, and his 1st Amendment Right to free speech....
 

Forum List

Back
Top