Trump channels Mussolini and threatens reprisal against his opponents

Your observation is based in emotions. You keep describing what things are not. I say your arguments are emotional and you tell me emotions arent the same as *insert word here*. I know, thats why I'm using that word specifically

You are an idiot, right? You can not respond to the content of the post so you must attack me personally? To me that means you are an idiot. Correct me if I am wrong, are you or are you not an idiot.

I am saying your support is based in emotions. So far in response you've told me what emotions are not and now are on to flopping on the ground and screaming that I'm attacking you instead of responding to the fact that you have to change the Constitution to release the lawyer hoard on people.

Instead of answering my question of What else do you want to change in the Constitution? You instead opt to deflect and now call names
 
Matt Walsh yesterday wrote that Trump has become a danger to our American Republic.

Walsh points out that, "in just the last couple of days, Donald Trump has promised reprisals against his critics when he's elected president, pledging to "open up" libel laws so that he can punish anyone who writes "negative" or "false" stories about him. He said his critics "will have problems" when he's in power. Remember, Trump claims that EVERY critique of him, no matter how true, is "false," so he is clearly vowing to outlaw all criticism of government. If Obama had said anything even remotely in the neighborhood of this when he was running for president, every conservative in the country would've exploded with rage (justifiably). But Trump said it and it hardly sparked much of a backlash at all."

"Then Trump proceeded to retweet a quote from Benito Mussolini, the Fascist dictator, and later admitted that he knew the quote was from Mussolini but decided to distribute it anyway. To be clear, for anyone who isn't versed in recent world history, quoting Mussolini is exactly morally analogous to quoting Hitler. It would be like Trump finding a passage in Mein Kampf and sympathetically reading it at one of his rallies."

Trump at first refused to repudiate David Duke and the KKK. He dodged on TV if he should denounce the supremacists and nationalists . It took continued pressure to make Donald give on the issue. He also said he knew little about Duke and his background, though in a 2000 interview, Trump disavowed Duke and the supremacists as out of step with American values.

Back to Walsh: "Now, guys, this was all in the span of just three days. And it should be noted that a great number of his fans cheered him on when he promised to censor speech and defended him when he quoted Mussolini and refused to criticize white supremacy. I said last week that the scariest thing about Trump is that he's running as a tyrant, unabashedly so, and his fans want him BECAUSE of it. His fans are explicitly asking for Trump to rule as an emperor. They don't desire freedom or liberty anymore, and they don't give a damn about the Constitution. What they want is a political Strongman who will "restore America's greatness" through brute and oppressive force." On Facebook February 28, 2016 at 3:11 pm.
One of our own, Vigilante, has said quite clearly that he wants Trump to be King or Dictator.
 
Sheesh Jake I've been known to quote Conan the Barbarian. I'm not going to become Conan for crying out loud.

:lol:

"Conan! What is best in life? Conan: Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women. "
 
61c6a3e05249810a910f6a706700e04c.jpg



upload_2016-3-1_11-19-9.jpeg


'Nuff said....
 
Sheesh Jake I've been known to quote Conan the Barbarian. I'm not going to become Conan for crying out loud.

:lol:

"Conan! What is best in life? Conan: Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women. "

DANCER!!! PUHLEEEEEZE....... I have ---'in my mind's eye' an image of a
delicate little you-------dancing---like tinkerbelle
 
Last edited:
I am saying your support is based in emotions. So far in response you've told me what emotions are not and now are on to flopping on the ground and screaming that I'm attacking you instead of responding to the fact that you have to change the Constitution to release the lawyer hoard on people.

Instead of answering my question of What else do you want to change in the Constitution? You instead opt to deflect and now call names
You got a camera on me, your responses have all been irrational. I am not here to answer your stupid questions which have nothing to do with my posts.

You are hardly clever, simply an idiot who is a liar. When you quit making stuff up maybe I will join you in a discussion but if you continue to make stuff up, I will continue to call you a liar, unless you do not realize you are making stuff up, then you are simply an idiot.

Your post reads extremely, poor. "based in emotions"? "are not and now"?
 
Here is some good counsel for you, elektra and all of us.

“October 6, 1774 ~ John Wesley:
I met those of our society who had votes in the ensuing election, and advised them
1. To vote, without fee or reward, for the person they judged most worthy
2. To speak no evil of the person they voted against, and
3. To take care their spirits were not sharpened against those that voted on the other side.”
 
You don't define anything in this OP. Quoting Mussoline, Walsh said, is morally analogous to quoting Hitler. Words have meanings.
Okay, words have meaning, I agree, so you believe quoting Hitler is the same as quoting quoting Mussolini? And you agree Mussolini did not gas the Jews?
I'd agree the drip is not as bad as syphilis.

syphilis does not actually drip-----you must be thinking of gonorrhea. (aka CLAP)
yeah, that's what I was saying. Trump's only spouting the clap and not syphilis.
 
elektra melt down when caught out!

Jake, how sad of you, was this a simple troll thread or are you getting a bit emotional? Or both? Why so quick to make it about me and not your false premise.

How is it even an issue of morality to quote Mussolini, oh, I saw your response, you just quoted that but did not say it?
You are responsible for what you write, elektra..

Pointing out Trump's fascist tendencies is anything but a troll thread.

You attacked me and I cleaned your clock immediately to get you ticking correctly.

It is insane of you to suggest that it is not an issue to quote Mussolini in a campaign.
 
Did he disavow Duke initially: no.

Did he say that he did not really know about Duke when in fact he knew all about him: yes.

As he threatened those who disagree with him: yes.

Will he use the government to punish his enemies: yes.

And suggesting the GWB or BHO ever threatened their enemies in such a way is mentally feeble or a deliberate liar.

So your dear leader never told Latinos to "punish our enemies"?

Obama tells Latinos to ‘punish our enemies,’ the GOP

I think you're the liar.
 
Did he disavow Duke initially: no.

Did he say that he did not really know about Duke when in fact he knew all about him: yes.

As he threatened those who disagree with him: yes.

Will he use the government to punish his enemies: yes.

And suggesting the GWB or BHO ever threatened their enemies in such a way is mentally feeble or a deliberate liar.

So your dear leader never told Latinos to "punish our enemies"?

Obama tells Latinos to ‘punish our enemies,’ the GOP

I think you're the liar.
Tu quoque at this point is laughable. We are talking about 2016 and Trump's fascist tendencies. If you believe what you just wrote, then you are fine with Obama as a president and just fine with fascism. Yet you say you are a libertarian.
 
You have to change the Constitution to do so. What other things would you like changed in the Constitution?
Freedom of Speech and Slander are two very different things, it is time to hold the Media accountable for all the lies they tell.
Slander already exists as a law. So, why not PROVE slander instead of destroying the 1st Amendment? Too hard?
 
I am saying your support is based in emotions. So far in response you've told me what emotions are not and now are on to flopping on the ground and screaming that I'm attacking you instead of responding to the fact that you have to change the Constitution to release the lawyer hoard on people.

Instead of answering my question of What else do you want to change in the Constitution? You instead opt to deflect and now call names
You got a camera on me, your responses have all been irrational. I am not here to answer your stupid questions which have nothing to do with my posts.

You are hardly clever, simply an idiot who is a liar. When you quit making stuff up maybe I will join you in a discussion but if you continue to make stuff up, I will continue to call you a liar, unless you do not realize you are making stuff up, then you are simply an idiot.

Your post reads extremely, poor. "based in emotions"? "are not and now"?

So you dont want to change the Constitution anymore?
 
Sounds like he's gonna have an 'Enemies List' like Hussein. Hussein and the Clintons are well known for ordering their IRS Henchmen to attack their enemies. So be advised all you Trump-haters, the IRS is gonna wanna have a little chat wth you. It's audit time.
 
The American turned on Joe McCarthy when he walked the bad road, too.
 
You don't define anything in this OP. Quoting Mussoline, Walsh said, is morally analogous to quoting Hitler. Words have meanings.
Okay, words have meaning, I agree, so you believe quoting Hitler is the same as quoting quoting Mussolini? And you agree Mussolini did not gas the Jews?
Do you know what the words "morally analogous" mean? It appears that you do not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top