Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 34,994
- 23,057
- 1,845
Because political retribution is what makes for good governance right?
At this point it appears that you all have left no other good options.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because political retribution is what makes for good governance right?
The problem is you lack evidence for your allegations.
Can you think of any other candidate over your voting life you would vote for if he stole money from a charity, was convicted of what is tantamount to election interference, was found to have cheated on his taxes, raped a woman, orchestrated a violent attempt to block the elected prez's certification, and tried to use fake electors to steal an election?
Because there is nothing to charge anyone with.Nothing he has said or done indicates an intention to do so. He is making a point. He is being treated unfairly and would be justified in retaliating.
But in his last term, the people he appointed as AG had the balls to tell him, NO, when he wanted to do something untoward. He will do so again. He will appoint someone with integrity in the mold of Bill Barr, and that person will not pursue a political vendetta for the President.
Sure there was. A jury found trump guilty after reviewing the evidence. LOL at no evidence. You're insane.the REAL problem is that there was never any evidence to allegations against Trump nor for his conviction. that's a much bigger problem for this country.
Sure there was. A jury found trump guilty after reviewing the evidence. LOL at no evidence. You're insane.
There was actual evidence. Convicted by a jury agreed upon by both parties. You live in a fantasy world, traitor. Try reading some other news besides your right wing propaganda and Russian propaganda mouthpieces.None whatso ever. You know it, everyone knows it was a sham trial. You just are happy with the outcome.
He has every right to go after those who have illegally persecuted, prosecuted, accused him, and he was quite clear he has no intention to do so. When people so hopelessly afflicted with malevolent TDS so misrepresent what he says, it makes even strong constitutionalists like myself question whether this free speech re demonizing people was a good idea. For people so hopelessly afflicted with malevolent TDS there is zero honesty, integrity, ethics to be found. Whatever he says, whatever he does, whatever mannerism he uses, whatever he hopes for or suggests or proposes or just thinks out loud is pronounced evil and some malicious nefarious motive is attached to it. And if they can't twist what he actually said into something hatefully different, they make something up.‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’
Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.
Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.
At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:
Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies
This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.
Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
The President does not have that power, dipshit. You're a piece of shit and trump is a piece of shit. Get that through your thick skull, traitor.He has every right to go after those who have illegally persecuted, prosecuted, accused him, and he was quite clear he has no intention to do so. When people so hopelessly afflicted with malevolent TDS so misrepresent what he says that it makes even strong constitutionalists like myself question whether this free speech re demonizing people was a good idea. For people so hopelessly afflicted with malevolent TDS there is zero honesty to be found. Whatever he says, whatever he does, whatever mannerism he uses, whatever he hopes for or suggests or proposes or just thinks out loud is evil and maliciously attaches some nefarious motive to it. And if they can't twist what he actually said into something different, they make something up.
It is both amazing and distressing to watch.
The case against her would have been extremely flimsy and generally unprecedented.
TRump isnt going to do shit if he's elected, moron. You bought that lie from him as well?Trump is right. What goes around, comes around.
Trump's persecutors know what they are doing, and they know that there will be consequences if they fail to eliminate the Trumpsters.
.‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’
Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.
Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.
At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:
Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies
This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.
Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’
Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.
Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.
At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:
Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies
This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.
Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
TRump isnt going to do shit if he's elected, moron. You bought that lie from him as well?
1. Biden isnt a pedophile. Reported for falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile..
Oh, you mean like Pedo Joe prosecutes HIS enemies?
.
“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.”
Meh, you know I'm right, you're just happy about it. Go play in the street, kid. Dismissed.There was actual evidence. Convicted by a jury agreed upon by both parties. You live in a fantasy world, traitor. Try reading some other news besides your right wing propaganda and Russian propaganda mouthpieces.
That’s simply not true. The evidence is plentiful and largely uncontested.the REAL problem is that there was never any evidence to allegations against Trump nor for his conviction. that's a much bigger problem for this country.
There is no evidence linking her to the deletion of the server after subpoena was issued.Destroying evidence is not unprecedented.