jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,210
- 29,145
no, you never said anything accept that more time meant more votes. that is but an obvious lie otherwise no one would ever win. at some point one must have a message. do you know what clinton's was? No one else does. the one thing for sure we know following her whine tour is that she was owed it.how come that doesn't always work for the local candidates?My argument is the more you campaign in a locale, the more votes you get, there.
It's not rocket science,
I didn't specify the shape of the curve. Just that it's positive for votes, for an increase in time.
Of course one candidates curve may be steeper, or start from a higher spot making it impossible for the other candiate to catch up. But the simple trend is the more time and money any one individual spends, the more votes that individual gets on election day.