Trump supporters: What do you think of this post?

[Mac1958]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

Obama took unemployment over 10%. It skyrocketed under him during his first two years. Conversely, unemployment has steadily declined under President Trump's first two years.

Unemploment was 8% when Obama was sworn in an peaked in the Third Quarter in 2009 - During the First Quarter of Obama's First Fiscal Year which started October 1, 2009.

Correct, it was increasing as he entered office and topped out right at about 10%, once the Treasury's and Fed's measures began pulling us out of the disaster.
.
.

 

[B. Kidd]

The unemployment numbers under Obama were "fake news" because they did not count the millions of Americans who had given up looking for a job and were, therefore, no longer "unemployed."

Actually, over 90 per cent of new jobs created under Obie were part-time, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer differentiated new jobs between full-time and part-time.
Another true story!

That too is a rightard lie...

Part time jobs (1.5m)...​

Full time jobs (+8.5m)...​

1.5m out of 10m is 15%, not 90%.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Somebody found some fake graphs.

 

[B. Kidd]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The unemployment numbers under Obama were "fake news" because they did not count the millions of Americans who had given up looking for a job and were, therefore, no longer "unemployed."

Actually, over 90 per cent of new jobs created under Obie were part-time, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer differentiated new jobs between full-time and part-time.
Another true story!

That too is a rightard lie...

Part time jobs (1.5m)...​

Full time jobs (+8.5m)...​

1.5m out of 10m is 15%, not 90%.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Somebody found some fake graphs.

Fake graphs straight from the government...the same agency that gives us Trump's numbers.

I refuse to believe you are this fucking stupid, but I have no doubt you are this fucking dishonest

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

more fake news.

 

[B. Kidd]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

more fake news.

It's an interactive learning experience.
As usual, you fail to interact and fail to learn.
What else is new?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

more fake news.

It's an interactive learning experience.
As usual, you fail to interact and fail to learn.
What else is new?

You are full of shit...that has already been proven. You have nothing to offer to back up your stupid bullshit story.

 

[Faun]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

It's just a post. They got a button that makes it so you can't see them. Are you miffed at the post?

I'm fascinated by it, and the psychology behind it.

I notice you didn't want to answer the question.

That's interesting too.
.

Maybe I'm to simple? I have never had a hard time making the money I want or need. Bush, Obama or Trump, none of them or their charts effect me. What's fascinating?

What's fascinating about it has nothing to do with you. It's about how far Trumpsters will go to distort reality.

The poster said "Obama took unemployment over 10%", clearly inferring that the high unemployment rate was somehow Obama's fault, and not the result of the effects of the Meltdown that we all know he inherited.

Or, maybe you really don't know that. No way for me to tell.
.

It did not go over 10% and it did not go up for Obama's first two years. The post was total bullshit and 46 pages later the sheep are still defending it.

Technically, it did go over 10% at that time. I think it peaked at 10.1%f or 10.2%. But then it it was lowered to 10.0% after figures were revised not long after that.

 

[B. Kidd]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

more fake news.

It's an interactive learning experience.
As usual, you fail to interact and fail to learn.
What else is new?

You are full of shit...that has already been proven. You have nothing to offer to back up your stupid bullshit story.

I detect Gator tears.......

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

more fake news.

It's an interactive learning experience.
As usual, you fail to interact and fail to learn.
What else is new?

You are full of shit...that has already been proven. You have nothing to offer to back up your stupid bullshit story.

I detect Gator tears.......

yes, tears of laughter at you making a fool of yourself parroting fake news.

 

[Faun]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

Obama took unemployment over 10%. It skyrocketed under him during his first two years. Conversely, unemployment has steadily declined under President Trump's first two years.

It's almost as moronic as this post of his...

The funny part is - it took Obama 7 years to create a million jobs. It took President Trump 7 months.

The thing is, I think they really believe stuff like that.
.

They suffer from Trump Ddelusional Sycophancy

 

[Crixus]

It's just a post. They got a button that makes it so you can't see them. Are you miffed at the post?

I'm fascinated by it, and the psychology behind it.

I notice you didn't want to answer the question.

That's interesting too.
.

Maybe I'm to simple? I have never had a hard time making the money I want or need. Bush, Obama or Trump, none of them or their charts effect me. What's fascinating?

What's fascinating about it has nothing to do with you. It's about how far Trumpsters will go to distort reality.

The poster said "Obama took unemployment over 10%", clearly inferring that the high unemployment rate was somehow Obama's fault, and not the result of the effects of the Meltdown that we all know he inherited.

Or, maybe you really don't know that. No way for me to tell.
.

It did not go over 10% and it did not go up for Obama's first two years. The post was total bullshit and 46 pages later the sheep are still defending it.

I assume they get that stuff from their alternate universe websites.
.

Oh I see. Well, that's your opinion you gathered from the stuff you pull up and post. You are a rabid centrist so you are a lived to say it's crap. You already know your sources are the only correct ones. That's a very rabid centrist way to be about it. Honestly, normal folks just don't care. They are working or they aren't.

 

[Faun]

The unemployment numbers under Obama were "fake news" because they did not count the millions of Americans who had given up looking for a job and were, therefore, no longer "unemployed."

Actually, over 90 per cent of new jobs created under Obie were part-time, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer differentiated new jobs between full-time and part-time.
Another true story!

That too is a rightard lie...

Part time jobs (1.5m)...​

Full time jobs (+8.5m)...​

1.5m out of 10m is 15%, not 90%.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Somebody found some fake graphs.

LOLOLOL

You nutters crack me up.

Be sure to let me know when you stumble upon more accurate statistics than those compiled by the BLS.

 

[Faun]

Dear Reader.
Google 'Most of the new jobs under Obama were part time jobs'.

As high as 94%!!! (Google is your friend!).

LOL

Moron, I posted the actual figures, not the ones found on www.figurespulledoutofimpeachedtrumpsass.com

 

[GreenAndBlue]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

Obama took unemployment over 10%. It skyrocketed under him during his first two years. Conversely, unemployment has steadily declined under President Trump's first two years.

Two things, official unemployment during true Hussein went “down” simply because they stopped counting people that gave up looking for a job after two years. If you look at the percentage of population in the workforce, it dropped drastically during his reign.

It only started to creep up for the better when Dems were thrown out of Congress and the Hussein became a lame duck.

So you agree with the post, it's fine with you?
.

Why the fuck don't you tell us about the post you dumb ignorant fucking hypocrite?

Tell us again, please....how you deny that the 2008 crash was ALL republicans fault.

I have never once seen you acknowledge what the economy did (unemployment rate) did only after the democrats took control of congress after 2007 and then lost the House in 2010.

Do you know what the unemployment rate was at the end of 2006? It was 4.6 percent where the republicans had control of congress from 1995 to 2006.

What did the unemployment rate do from 2007 to 2010 under democrat control?

Well, go ahead you demented double talking ignorant hypocritical loser.

Better whip out that race card you cling to you dumb buttfuck. You are owned in your own thread.

I will be waiting for you to tell me what the unemployment rate did from 2007 to 2010, under democrat control.

The fact that you credit obama.....

Good Lord you are a loser.

Yes you nailed mac the total hypocrite to the wall...

He is pitiful

 

[Faun]

The unemployment numbers under Obama were "fake news" because they did not count the millions of Americans who had given up looking for a job and were, therefore, no longer "unemployed."

Actually, over 90 per cent of new jobs created under Obie were part-time, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer differentiated new jobs between full-time and part-time.
Another true story!

That too is a rightard lie...

Part time jobs (1.5m)...​

Full time jobs (+8.5m)...​

1.5m out of 10m is 15%, not 90%.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Somebody found some fake graphs.

Fake graphs straight from the government...the same agency that gives us Trump's numbers.

I refuse to believe you are this fucking stupid, but I have no doubt you are this fucking dishonest

I can believe he's that stupid.

 

[miketx]

Obama came in after the collapse, the surge in dropping unemployment and improving the market was easy as he started at a much lower baseline.

It's like a baseball player who is in a slump and is hitting .160 at mid-year and then finishes the year at .200, while the guy hitting .350 at mid year has to try and improve but ends up batting .338 for the year.. Do fans heap praise on the first batter for this amazing run to end the year? Trump entered office with the economy doing fairly well. Not great, but basically "normal". He needed to improve the results to be better than average and he has.

Once Obama took over and went wild with debt and investing, coupled with interest free money, it was a certain that the economy would rebound and numbers will continue. Anyone could do that on the backs of future generation. He would have been far more impressive to go after those who abused their shareholders and played the system which helped temporarily hurt it badly. This use of debt is also going to hurt Trump, though he used most of it for the military, not the market.

You have to look at job creation, wage increases and the more granular aspects of the economy. He should trumpet these successes about driving investment by U.S corporations, returning jobs back, pushing for retraining commitments and calling companies to remain in America. Also, the USMCA, it's a weakness for the Dems that they have disregarded it, he needs to speak about the auto industry requirements in particular that force Mexico to pay higher wages. This will lead to jobs staying in the U.S, some may even come back from Mexico.

They have avoided signing this and Trump must tout it on the campaign trail and evidence the Dems don't care about their jobs, Middle Class or helping the poor with industry, they are supporting Big Businesses to leave. He can turn the narrative easily.

So what do you think about the post?
.

It's fake news.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

The unemployment numbers under Obama were "fake news" because they did not count the millions of Americans who had given up looking for a job and were, therefore, no longer "unemployed."

Actually, over 90 per cent of new jobs created under Obie were part-time, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer differentiated new jobs between full-time and part-time.
Another true story!

That too is a rightard lie...

Part time jobs (1.5m)...​

Full time jobs (+8.5m)...​

1.5m out of 10m is 15%, not 90%.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Somebody found some fake graphs.

Fake graphs straight from the government...the same agency that gives us Trump's numbers.

I refuse to believe you are this fucking stupid, but I have no doubt you are this fucking dishonest

I can believe he's that stupid.

You liberals better be scared to death

All the dominoes are falling to stop liberals too

China will team with trump America because of having the same agenda

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

Two things, official unemployment during true Hussein went “down” simply because they stopped counting people that gave up looking for a job after two years. If you look at the percentage of population in the workforce, it dropped drastically during his reign.

It only started to creep up for the better when Dems were thrown out of Congress and the Hussein became a lame duck.

So you agree with the post, it's fine with you?
.

Why the fuck don't you tell us about the post you dumb ignorant fucking hypocrite?

Tell us again, please....how you deny that the 2008 crash was ALL republicans fault.

I have never once seen you acknowledge what the economy did (unemployment rate) did only after the democrats took control of congress after 2007 and then lost the House in 2010.

Do you know what the unemployment rate was at the end of 2006? It was 4.6 percent where the republicans had control of congress from 1995 to 2006.

What did the unemployment rate do from 2007 to 2010 under democrat control?

Well, go ahead you demented double talking ignorant hypocritical loser.

Better whip out that race card you cling to you dumb buttfuck. You are owned in your own thread.

I will be waiting for you to tell me what the unemployment rate did from 2007 to 2010, under democrat control.

The fact that you credit obama.....

Good Lord you are a loser.

Yeah.

So what do you think of the post?
.

Fuck you

Fuck you back, you impotent prick.

 

[Mac1958]

This is a post from another thread.

In all seriousness, I'd like to know what you think of it. Please be as complete in your response as you would like. I have provided a chart of the unemployment rate below for your reference.

Thanks.

Obama took unemployment over 10%. It skyrocketed under him during his first two years. Conversely, unemployment has steadily declined under President Trump's first two years.

Two things, official unemployment during true Hussein went “down” simply because they stopped counting people that gave up looking for a job after two years. If you look at the percentage of population in the workforce, it dropped drastically during his reign.

It only started to creep up for the better when Dems were thrown out of Congress and the Hussein became a lame duck.

So you agree with the post, it's fine with you?
.

Why the fuck don't you tell us about the post you dumb ignorant fucking hypocrite?

Tell us again, please....how you deny that the 2008 crash was ALL republicans fault.

I have never once seen you acknowledge what the economy did (unemployment rate) did only after the democrats took control of congress after 2007 and then lost the House in 2010.

Do you know what the unemployment rate was at the end of 2006? It was 4.6 percent where the republicans had control of congress from 1995 to 2006.

What did the unemployment rate do from 2007 to 2010 under democrat control?

Well, go ahead you demented double talking ignorant hypocritical loser.

Better whip out that race card you cling to you dumb buttfuck. You are owned in your own thread.

I will be waiting for you to tell me what the unemployment rate did from 2007 to 2010, under democrat control.

The fact that you credit obama.....

Good Lord you are a loser.

Yes you nailed mac the total hypocrite to the wall...

He is pitiful

Okay, great, got it.

So anyway, what is your independent, original, intelligent, informed analysis of the graph in the OP?
.