depotoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
My claims? I read the article for what it was. Per candidate, not per party.That was not what the article was about. It is what you wanted it to be about. Because it wasn’t you go on a several pages long rant trying to make a point they weren’t making, claiming their original point was wrong, when it wasn’t. Give it up! Your butt hurt is unbelievable.They dont even have trumps numbers for small donations.Women originally in the suburbs showed little support for Trump. It has increased, showing suburban women are now supporting him. He has the largest totals amongst large donations of all the candidates individually, not collectively by party. Only you read it that way in your cockeyed view. That was the basis of the opensecrets article. Geeesh.
He has the largest "Large" contributions but Bernie has the highest at almost twice as much total for suburban women donations. Meaning, Bernie is getting a boat load of small donations from suburban women and so is Pete. What that all means is, Suburban Women will, for the most part, NOT vote for Rump. When you take the total of the top 4, Rump has only about a sixth of the amount. And then most of that is from large donations. Suburban Women will vote Democrat this time around by a large margin.
But they have the totals. Do the math. Rump only leads in the large donation category. That means that more people donated to the others by a very wide margin with smaller donations. You can try and us fuzzy math if you want but you can't change the fact that Rump cannot depend on Suburban Women to get reelected.
I took the time to do the math and it didn't add up to your claims. In your world, did they have a course called Fuzzy Math 101?
And I am having a ball over here. This is entertaining, cupcake.
You didn’t read it properly, then went on a rant, got called on it, then now show your butt hurt because they didn’t do it by party because then you would be right! (Though it is odd they did not include the donations by small donors to Trump, hmmm, wonder why). But I cannot make an assumption as they did not include it. I’m not like you. Making a mountain out of a molehill.