Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are disturbed by someone stating a fact that has historical proof that it IS a fact, then you are bound to get your feelings hurt in a forum like this.
You started the namecalling first and had the nerve to whine about it when you received the same.
You do not get a pass from receiving in return what you like to try to dish out.
It is not my problem that you're a thinskinned, little butthurt bitch.
Not sure what "fact" you are referring to, but I was not referring to any historical facts.
I was clearly referring to you insulting me.
It is not credible that you were too stupid to follow that. More likely that you are trying to dodge a point you cannot refute.
Like a coward.
You know perfectly well what historical fact I am referring to, so stop lying. If your attention span is so short that you cannot recall, re read the thread or have someone who is lucid enough to understand where you initiated the first insult, read it to you.
You were insulted.....IN RETURN.
Which is the only way to talk to a person like you.
There is nothing cowardly about not wasting time on one of the dimmest minds in this forum.
It was not the "historical fact" that offended me, but your racist insults attached to your "fact".
I've said that repeatedly, and if you still don't get it, then YOU are one of the dimmest minds on this forum.
You made a number of racists insults and I responded appropriately and you were shocked, shocked that someone would call you on your racism, and insult you back.
Lefties like to dish it out, but whine like babies when it comes back on them.
The difference is that your insults were lies, while my insults at you are all true.
That is what pisses you off, and why you keep replying.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
We did not make an initial judgement. She was actually a nice lady at first. Friendly. It wasn’t until she said something that confirmed the stereotype that I came here to tell what happened.Well, back up. Try to see it from her perspective.Sorry but what happened is exactly why white people like separate but equal.
First of all she was breaking rules. Typical. Then they want to argue the rules. Sorry bitch but the rules are the rules.
Then it goes to threats. This is not how we operate in white america.
Then ultimately I’m sure she believes it’s because she’s black.
Hey, I’m just telling you what I see out there. Unfiltered honesty.
And we thought it was so funny when she threatened to go get her brother. Wtf?
Ps. So when a black woman comes to interview with any of us and she’s being nice, we all know we are lucky. She’s just being nice. She’s hiding the crazy ghetto bitch. Unfortunately she just confirmed the negative stereotype of blacks. It happens far too often.
This is what stirs up all the yelling.
Is the rule she broke really an act of capital treason? Is there some legitimate reason for such rigid rule enforcement? Are you the person responsible for the enforcement of such rules?
Coming into that situation, without an adequate understanding of why this is such a big issue can lead one to believe there is an ulterior motive.
And, I am not excusing her behavior, but it would certainly be understandable if she has a legitimate reason to believe you were using the rules as a pretext to kick out the black chick.
But, regardless of her behavior, she did not confirm any negative stereotype of blacks. You did. Stereotypes are illogical conclusions that form attitudes toward a whole, based on limited experience with a very minor sub-parts of said whole. The "confirmation" happened in your mind, not in reality.
And you went and plastered your bias confirmation all over the place.
This is why individualism needs have a part in all of this, IM2. Neither of us should be associated with the bad actions of these individuals.
.
A dog in heat at a dog park, can lead to dangerous dog fights and/or unwanted breeding.
And generalizing about a group is not inherently illogical. ....
Judging individuals by generalizations IS illogical.
It is human nature, ....to make an initial judgment on meeting.
For those small humans we call children, because they are not capable of the mature reasoning expected of adults. I guess we know which one you are.
Who do you cite?Does anyone really expect to be taken seriously citing Wikipedia as a source?
When someone is losing the argument and doesn’t have a good comeback they fall back on questioning the source you use. Weak.Does anyone really expect to be taken seriously citing Wikipedia as a source?
Dude. You are a. arguing against the concept of generalization, and b. acting as though First Impressions are something only children do.
THe information in that page, at least the portions I cut and pasted for you, are basically correct, and are a good place for you to start, cause unless you are being dishonest you need to educate yourself on this issue, ASAP.
I have this new neighbor. First impression not good. My first impression is pretty spot on. He wasn’t nice when I introduced myself.Does anyone really expect to be taken seriously citing Wikipedia as a source?
Dude. You are a. arguing against the concept of generalization, and b. acting as though First Impressions are something only children do.
THe information in that page, at least the portions I cut and pasted for you, are basically correct, and are a good place for you to start, cause unless you are being dishonest you need to educate yourself on this issue, ASAP.
Until blacks really crack down on the bad that exist among their own communities or amongst their culture, then as you spoke about, they won't be getting any sympathy from whites at all. Stereotyping is easy when you observe a pattern that exist amongst blacks that ends up as an identifier of the bad traits and characteristics in which a good many blacks carry around with them in life. Sad thing is, is that these blacks want to blame whitey when they are attempting to be helped by them ???? Go figure that one out.We did not make an initial judgement. She was actually a nice lady at first. Friendly. It wasn’t until she said something that confirmed the stereotype that I came here to tell what happened.Well, back up. Try to see it from her perspective.
This is what stirs up all the yelling.
Is the rule she broke really an act of capital treason? Is there some legitimate reason for such rigid rule enforcement? Are you the person responsible for the enforcement of such rules?
Coming into that situation, without an adequate understanding of why this is such a big issue can lead one to believe there is an ulterior motive.
And, I am not excusing her behavior, but it would certainly be understandable if she has a legitimate reason to believe you were using the rules as a pretext to kick out the black chick.
But, regardless of her behavior, she did not confirm any negative stereotype of blacks. You did. Stereotypes are illogical conclusions that form attitudes toward a whole, based on limited experience with a very minor sub-parts of said whole. The "confirmation" happened in your mind, not in reality.
And you went and plastered your bias confirmation all over the place.
This is why individualism needs have a part in all of this, IM2. Neither of us should be associated with the bad actions of these individuals.
.
A dog in heat at a dog park, can lead to dangerous dog fights and/or unwanted breeding.
And generalizing about a group is not inherently illogical. ....
Judging individuals by generalizations IS illogical.
It is human nature, ....to make an initial judgment on meeting.
For those small humans we call children, because they are not capable of the mature reasoning expected of adults. I guess we know which one you are.
I’m just telling the story about how this black woman when told she needs to follow a rule threatened to bring her brother up to the park. I’ve seen whites argue in this park and no one has ever threatened to come back with their boys. That was a very stereotypical thing for her to say.
The only point I’m trying to make is if in the future any of us is interviewing a woman who sort of speaks ghetto we are going to remember they’re just being nice. We are lucky. Don’t make them angry. Don’t fire them. They might bring their brother up to work.
This is why I say the ghetto black community has to change. I know I’m right because I have black friends who tell me how fucked up their communities are. For example I know this woman who has two brothers both died arguing with someone over bullshit. And that shit happens every day in Detroit. You’re just a coward who won’t say it.
The people it hurts the most is black people. Black on black crime. So I don’t care if they don’t want to listen to my advice. And if they don’t want to change then they will continue to not get jobs because whites who hire also stereotype
You just continue to give them a piss poor education. You’re doing your part
Until blacks really crack down on the bad that exist among their own communities or amongst their culture, then as you spoke about, they won't be getting any sympathy from whites at all. Stereotyping is easy when you observe a pattern that exist amongst blacks that ends up as an identifier of the bad traits and characteristics in which a good many blacks carry around with them in life. Sad thing is, is that these blacks want to blame whitey when they are attempting to be helped by them ???? Go figure that one out.We did not make an initial judgement. She was actually a nice lady at first. Friendly. It wasn’t until she said something that confirmed the stereotype that I came here to tell what happened.A dog in heat at a dog park, can lead to dangerous dog fights and/or unwanted breeding.
And generalizing about a group is not inherently illogical. ....
Judging individuals by generalizations IS illogical.
It is human nature, ....to make an initial judgment on meeting.
For those small humans we call children, because they are not capable of the mature reasoning expected of adults. I guess we know which one you are.
I’m just telling the story about how this black woman when told she needs to follow a rule threatened to bring her brother up to the park. I’ve seen whites argue in this park and no one has ever threatened to come back with their boys. That was a very stereotypical thing for her to say.
The only point I’m trying to make is if in the future any of us is interviewing a woman who sort of speaks ghetto we are going to remember they’re just being nice. We are lucky. Don’t make them angry. Don’t fire them. They might bring their brother up to work.
This is why I say the ghetto black community has to change. I know I’m right because I have black friends who tell me how fucked up their communities are. For example I know this woman who has two brothers both died arguing with someone over bullshit. And that shit happens every day in Detroit. You’re just a coward who won’t say it.
The people it hurts the most is black people. Black on black crime. So I don’t care if they don’t want to listen to my advice. And if they don’t want to change then they will continue to not get jobs because whites who hire also stereotype
You just continue to give them a piss poor education. You’re doing your part
Children form first and lasting impressions based on superficialities because they lack the experience of reasoning more deeply. An adult should be expected to be a stronger thinker unless his mental and emotional development were arrested sometime before reaching maturity.
Not sure what "fact" you are referring to, but I was not referring to any historical facts.
I was clearly referring to you insulting me.
It is not credible that you were too stupid to follow that. More likely that you are trying to dodge a point you cannot refute.
Like a coward.
You know perfectly well what historical fact I am referring to, so stop lying. If your attention span is so short that you cannot recall, re read the thread or have someone who is lucid enough to understand where you initiated the first insult, read it to you.
You were insulted.....IN RETURN.
Which is the only way to talk to a person like you.
There is nothing cowardly about not wasting time on one of the dimmest minds in this forum.
It was not the "historical fact" that offended me, but your racist insults attached to your "fact".
I've said that repeatedly, and if you still don't get it, then YOU are one of the dimmest minds on this forum.
You made a number of racists insults and I responded appropriately and you were shocked, shocked that someone would call you on your racism, and insult you back.
Lefties like to dish it out, but whine like babies when it comes back on them.
The difference is that your insults were lies, while my insults at you are all true.
That is what pisses you off, and why you keep replying.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
I absolutely can insult a faceless racist IN RETURN in an anonymous forum without any emotion attached to it.
It's the same as swatting a bothersome insect.
And if you consider your anger to be "righteous", in a forum like this, you have some real problems that go far deeper than you just being........]
When someone is losing the argument and doesn’t have a good comeback they fall back on questioning the source you use. Weak.Does anyone really expect to be taken seriously citing Wikipedia as a source?
Dude. You are a. arguing against the concept of generalization, and b. acting as though First Impressions are something only children do.
THe information in that page, at least the portions I cut and pasted for you, are basically correct, and are a good place for you to start, cause unless you are being dishonest you need to educate yourself on this issue, ASAP.
Did he further the conversation? No. Unknotare is actually a thread derailer. You stop discussing the subject and instead have to defend why your comment isn’t racist.
What were we originally talking about? Oh yes, it was this black woman who confirmed a stereotype that whites have of blacks. They can be uncivilized and throw down over some pretty minor shit.
And the funny thing is unkotare isn’t any different than us. He knows these stereotypes too. Is he suggesting he has never run into an Asian with a stereotypical small packer?
My post still stands... When you separate yourself from the bad side of your culture or people, and call them out on their bullcrap, then we can talk progress in the situation. Whites have always separated themselves from the bad amongst their own race and culture, and they have even sacrificed heavily to help blacks overcome the past by allowing them into the fold of the good whites whom hate segregation and discrimination against blacks.Until blacks really crack down on the bad that exist among their own communities or amongst their culture, then as you spoke about, they won't be getting any sympathy from whites at all. Stereotyping is easy when you observe a pattern that exist amongst blacks that ends up as an identifier of the bad traits and characteristics in which a good many blacks carry around with them in life. Sad thing is, is that these blacks want to blame whitey when they are attempting to be helped by them ???? Go figure that one out.We did not make an initial judgement. She was actually a nice lady at first. Friendly. It wasn’t until she said something that confirmed the stereotype that I came here to tell what happened.Judging individuals by generalizations IS illogical.
It is human nature, ....to make an initial judgment on meeting.
For those small humans we call children, because they are not capable of the mature reasoning expected of adults. I guess we know which one you are.
I’m just telling the story about how this black woman when told she needs to follow a rule threatened to bring her brother up to the park. I’ve seen whites argue in this park and no one has ever threatened to come back with their boys. That was a very stereotypical thing for her to say.
The only point I’m trying to make is if in the future any of us is interviewing a woman who sort of speaks ghetto we are going to remember they’re just being nice. We are lucky. Don’t make them angry. Don’t fire them. They might bring their brother up to work.
This is why I say the ghetto black community has to change. I know I’m right because I have black friends who tell me how fucked up their communities are. For example I know this woman who has two brothers both died arguing with someone over bullshit. And that shit happens every day in Detroit. You’re just a coward who won’t say it.
The people it hurts the most is black people. Black on black crime. So I don’t care if they don’t want to listen to my advice. And if they don’t want to change then they will continue to not get jobs because whites who hire also stereotype
You just continue to give them a piss poor education. You’re doing your part
We'll do all that when whites do. Whitey is being held accountable for what whitey has done. Nobody is asking whitey to help, we are asking whitey to quit being racists. Whites want to talk shit about how it's easy to stereotype us but cry like Infants in shitty diapers if we stereotype all whites as racist because one white person choose to act racist.
And fuck sealybobo. He ignores white on white crime that happens at about triple the rate annually.
you need a valid argument not just Talk, right winger.Does anyone really expect to be taken seriously citing Wikipedia as a source?
you lost the bet; Take it like a Woman!Not sure what "fact" you are referring to, but I was not referring to any historical facts.
I was clearly referring to you insulting me.
It is not credible that you were too stupid to follow that. More likely that you are trying to dodge a point you cannot refute.
Like a coward.
You know perfectly well what historical fact I am referring to, so stop lying. If your attention span is so short that you cannot recall, re read the thread or have someone who is lucid enough to understand where you initiated the first insult, read it to you.
You were insulted.....IN RETURN.
Which is the only way to talk to a person like you.
There is nothing cowardly about not wasting time on one of the dimmest minds in this forum.
It was not the "historical fact" that offended me, but your racist insults attached to your "fact".
I've said that repeatedly, and if you still don't get it, then YOU are one of the dimmest minds on this forum.
You made a number of racists insults and I responded appropriately and you were shocked, shocked that someone would call you on your racism, and insult you back.
Lefties like to dish it out, but whine like babies when it comes back on them.
The difference is that your insults were lies, while my insults at you are all true.
That is what pisses you off, and why you keep replying.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
I absolutely can insult a faceless racist IN RETURN in an anonymous forum without any emotion attached to it.
It's the same as swatting a bothersome insect.
And if you consider your anger to be "righteous", in a forum like this, you have some real problems that go far deeper than you just being........
View attachment 263408
You know perfectly well what historical fact I am referring to, so stop lying. If your attention span is so short that you cannot recall, re read the thread or have someone who is lucid enough to understand where you initiated the first insult, read it to you.
You were insulted.....IN RETURN.
Which is the only way to talk to a person like you.
There is nothing cowardly about not wasting time on one of the dimmest minds in this forum.
It was not the "historical fact" that offended me, but your racist insults attached to your "fact".
I've said that repeatedly, and if you still don't get it, then YOU are one of the dimmest minds on this forum.
You made a number of racists insults and I responded appropriately and you were shocked, shocked that someone would call you on your racism, and insult you back.
Lefties like to dish it out, but whine like babies when it comes back on them.
The difference is that your insults were lies, while my insults at you are all true.
That is what pisses you off, and why you keep replying.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
I absolutely can insult a faceless racist IN RETURN in an anonymous forum without any emotion attached to it.
It's the same as swatting a bothersome insect.
And if you consider your anger to be "righteous", in a forum like this, you have some real problems that go far deeper than you just being........]
So, you are a sociopathic asshole. Got it. Not really sure why you are proud of that, but whatever.
It was not the "historical fact" that offended me, but your racist insults attached to your "fact".
I've said that repeatedly, and if you still don't get it, then YOU are one of the dimmest minds on this forum.
You made a number of racists insults and I responded appropriately and you were shocked, shocked that someone would call you on your racism, and insult you back.
Lefties like to dish it out, but whine like babies when it comes back on them.
The difference is that your insults were lies, while my insults at you are all true.
That is what pisses you off, and why you keep replying.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
I absolutely can insult a faceless racist IN RETURN in an anonymous forum without any emotion attached to it.
It's the same as swatting a bothersome insect.
And if you consider your anger to be "righteous", in a forum like this, you have some real problems that go far deeper than you just being........]
So, you are a sociopathic asshole. Got it. Not really sure why you are proud of that, but whatever.
You're a delusional, silly ass if you think for a moment thaf you are exempt from receving insults in return for the ones that you give.
Dont flatter yourself. Im not pissed off, at all. Ypu are.
I'm actually amused by your silly outrage and distorted view of reality.
You're an entertaining, self righteous wingnut.
It is possible that you can dish out and receive vile insults without any emotion. That is not something to be proud of .
My anger at your vile insults and lies, is righteous, you asshole.
I absolutely can insult a faceless racist IN RETURN in an anonymous forum without any emotion attached to it.
It's the same as swatting a bothersome insect.
And if you consider your anger to be "righteous", in a forum like this, you have some real problems that go far deeper than you just being........]
So, you are a sociopathic asshole. Got it. Not really sure why you are proud of that, but whatever.
You're a delusional, silly ass if you think for a moment thaf you are exempt from receving insults in return for the ones that you give.
Nothing I have ever said, has implied in anyway that I think that.
That was a lie told by you, to personally attack me.
Think about that. You feel that in order to attack me, that you have to lie.
That reveals, not only what you really think about me, but what you think about yourself.
democrats can spew racist garbage like this and still pretend they are virtuous just because they are democrats. What a load.
Denying differences in culture, do not make them go away.
Pretending your own fears and weaknesses are someone else’s culture does not make it so.
Agreed, it is more the massive amount of information and examples that do that.
It’s exactly what you’re doing. Grow up and grow a pair.
Did you read my example of my friend not wanting to let his children play with his "Ghetto" neighbors"?
...... in the future any of us is interviewing a woman who sort of speaks ghetto we are going to remember they’re just being nice. We are lucky. Don’t make them angry. Don’t fire them. They might bring their brother up to work......
