Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't carry a balance.No, just thinking about how poor people like you overuse your credit cards.Got some high balances, Stumpy?A better thing they could do is tell Credit Card Companies to suspend interest on all credit cards for a month.
It's gonna be a long recession.It is insane to send out checks. As mentioned tax cuts, having landlords stop collecting rent for the rest of the year, stop toll collection on highways, stop state taxes of any kind, that kind of thing makes more sense.
Yep, thats what i thought.Lol where does it state it can give certain ibdividuals money?Where does the constitution give the gov the power to give taxes to americans [sic] for relief?Only a Trumpleton could call Big Fat Don's plan to send helicopter money a far left policy. BTW, it isn't unconstitutional nitwit.
Article 1, Section 8.
Now I've given away the answer to the riddle in post 105. Didn't think it was that hard.
Look, I'm not gonna play stoopid games but as I told you if it clears your conscience just sign your check over to me and I'll find good use for it. I'll even name it after you.
Now hush your bullshit
Dumbasses STILL arguing its constitutional but can't cite the constitution.
Its amazing how intellectual dishonest hacks can be.
The Undead always pay off their balances in full.Once you are in Hell, it won’t matter what you carry. God keeps the records, not you, and you will never be able to pay your way in to Heaven.
I don't carry a balance.No, just thinking about how poor people like you overuse your credit cards.Got some high balances, Stumpy?A better thing they could do is tell Credit Card Companies to suspend interest on all credit cards for a month.
The money would certainly help a lot of Americans that are not working right now and are struggling to pay bills and buy groceries, especially service workers that rely on tips more than they do an actual wage or salary. The amount of people it would help would outweigh the people that will abuse the $1,000 or don't need it as badly as others but a one size fits all approach like that may not be as effective. In my personal opinion having large amounts of loans sent to small and medium size businesses around the country so that they can continue to meet payroll and pay people while at home would be ideal. I would also suspend federal income tax temporarily so that people are taking home a little more money each week. Just a thought.
Besides miketx buying tranny hookers, how would one "abuse" the $1000.00?
"abuse" might have been the wrong word choice but I guess I meant people who would simply take advantage of the $1,000 versus the people who need it for actual financial survival due to this crisis.
How would someone take advantage?
They would be taking advantage by accepting money that they know they don't necessarily need. Money that is meant for people who are facing financial impacts by either losing their job or losing pay because of coronavirus. It would be an integrity issue for me.
And that is why I disagree with it. Every lowlife in the country will get it and blow it on hookers and blow.The money would certainly help a lot of Americans that are not working right now and are struggling to pay bills and buy groceries, especially service workers that rely on tips more than they do an actual wage or salary. The amount of people it would help would outweigh the people that will abuse the $1,000 or don't need it as badly as others but a one size fits all approach like that may not be as effective. In my personal opinion having large amounts of loans sent to small and medium size businesses around the country so that they can continue to meet payroll and pay people while at home would be ideal. I would also suspend federal income tax temporarily so that people are taking home a little more money each week. Just a thought.
Besides miketx buying tranny hookers, how would one "abuse" the $1000.00?
"abuse" might have been the wrong word choice but I guess I meant people who would simply take advantage of the $1,000 versus the people who need it for actual financial survival due to this crisis.
How would someone take advantage?
They would be taking advantage by accepting money that they know they don't necessarily need. Money that is meant for people who are facing financial impacts by either losing their job or losing pay because of coronavirus. It would be an integrity issue for me.
Not only is it unconstitutional, it will normalize the freakazoid far left's policies.
People are against it now but start having the govt hand out "free" money to these imbeciles and their politics will change.
"Hey man, this aint so bad. Lets vote for these extreme leftists and get more free shit"
A perfect example is democrats and the welfare system. The "new plantation" as some call it.
Dependence on the federal govt is regressive and flat out stupid.
The "progressives" want to take us back to the 13th century england. A crisis is a perfect way to do it!
Now that you read this, go back to the medias fear mongering.
Good day.
The money would certainly help a lot of Americans that are not working right now and are struggling to pay bills and buy groceries, especially service workers that rely on tips more than they do an actual wage or salary. The amount of people it would help would outweigh the people that will abuse the $1,000 or don't need it as badly as others but a one size fits all approach like that may not be as effective. In my personal opinion having large amounts of loans sent to small and medium size businesses around the country so that they can continue to meet payroll and pay people while at home would be ideal. I would also suspend federal income tax temporarily so that people are taking home a little more money each week. Just a thought.
Besides miketx buying tranny hookers, how would one "abuse" the $1000.00?
"abuse" might have been the wrong word choice but I guess I meant people who would simply take advantage of the $1,000 versus the people who need it for actual financial survival due to this crisis.
How would someone take advantage?
They would be taking advantage by accepting money that they know they don't necessarily need. Money that is meant for people who are facing financial impacts by either losing their job or losing pay because of coronavirus. It would be an integrity issue for me.
Isn't everyone effected by the coronavirus?
The money would certainly help a lot of Americans that are not working right now and are struggling to pay bills and buy groceries, especially service workers that rely on tips more than they do an actual wage or salary. The amount of people it would help would outweigh the people that will abuse the $1,000 or don't need it as badly as others but a one size fits all approach like that may not be as effective. In my personal opinion having large amounts of loans sent to small and medium size businesses around the country so that they can continue to meet payroll and pay people while at home would be ideal. I would also suspend federal income tax temporarily so that people are taking home a little more money each week. Just a thought.
Besides miketx buying tranny hookers, how would one "abuse" the $1000.00?
"abuse" might have been the wrong word choice but I guess I meant people who would simply take advantage of the $1,000 versus the people who need it for actual financial survival due to this crisis.
How would someone take advantage?
They would be taking advantage by accepting money that they know they don't necessarily need. Money that is meant for people who are facing financial impacts by either losing their job or losing pay because of coronavirus. It would be an integrity issue for me.
Isn't everyone effected by the coronavirus?
So who will pay the landlords bills?
Besides miketx buying tranny hookers, how would one "abuse" the $1000.00?
"abuse" might have been the wrong word choice but I guess I meant people who would simply take advantage of the $1,000 versus the people who need it for actual financial survival due to this crisis.
How would someone take advantage?
They would be taking advantage by accepting money that they know they don't necessarily need. Money that is meant for people who are facing financial impacts by either losing their job or losing pay because of coronavirus. It would be an integrity issue for me.
Isn't everyone effected by the coronavirus?
I'm not.
Bullshit.So who will pay the landlords bills?
Generally, if they have been in business a few years they already own the property. So their only expense is real estate tax to the town or city and since the state caused it, they should not have to pay this year either.
Pass an amendment. Then prepare for full statism.Not only is it unconstitutional, it will normalize the freakazoid far left's policies.
People are against it now but start having the govt hand out "free" money to these imbeciles and their politics will change.
"Hey man, this aint so bad. Lets vote for these extreme leftists and get more free shit"
A perfect example is democrats and the welfare system. The "new plantation" as some call it.
Dependence on the federal govt is regressive and flat out stupid.
The "progressives" want to take us back to the 13th century england. A crisis is a perfect way to do it!
Now that you read this, go back to the medias fear mongering.
Good day.
The economy is contracting by $1 trillion. This could lead us into another Great Depression.
The Trump administration's attempts to increase fiscal stimulus contradicts this.
Bumper sticker slogans and shallow ideology does this country no good.
Yea it can appropriate funds as long as it is an enumerated power you fucking MORON.Yep, thats what i thought.Lol where does it state it can give certain ibdividuals money?Where does the constitution give the gov the power to give taxes to americans [sic] for relief?
Article 1, Section 8.
Now I've given away the answer to the riddle in post 105. Didn't think it was that hard.
Look, I'm not gonna play stoopid games but as I told you if it clears your conscience just sign your check over to me and I'll find good use for it. I'll even name it after you.
Now hush your bullshit
You really need this spelled out?
Article 1 Section 8 says Congress appropriates funds. It doesn't pick over EVery LITtle THING it can use those funds for. It couldn't do that.
Holy Shit. What kind of AM radio are they cranking out there in Tennessee?
eDumbasses STILL arguing its constitutional but can't cite the constitution.
Its amazing how intellectual dishonest hacks can be.
Nobody popped up saying it's 'constitutional' --- YOU started out saying it isn't.
YOU got the burden of proof here.
