"Anchor baby" is offensive and hurtful?

What aren't these liberal pansies offended by? Geeze, it's a wonder they haven't all offed themselves.
They're not offended. They're doing what they always do: They're taking advantage of the opportunity to feign offense so that they can put their targets on the defensive and change the subject. They don't give a shit about the term, it's just leverage for them, that's it.
.
Trump offends me just but being here. What he says just makes it worse. Talk up those anchor babies, but first find out if there actually are any and if that matters a damn...
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
Oh but they are, hence the problem. What you believe the Supreme Court does not, which fucks you good and hard...
 
You show your ignorance by claiming people are here illegally. Babies are born while the mother is here on student visa's, work visa's, tourist visa's. A girl here on a "green card" that allows her to work here for two to ten years can be the mother of what are being called "anchor babies".

they aren't american citizens...green cards and student visas don't grant citizenship.

Deport. ALL. Illegals.
The children of legal visitors to this country are being referred to as anchor babies, insinuating that they are born for the purpose of gaining citizenship. It is a stereotype and the reporter was not telling Trump he needed to be PC or that he was being offensive to everyone. He was informing him that at least to some people, the term was offensive. Instead of Trump being showing some sensitivity or diplomacy, he gave the answer her gave. Some think it was not a sign of Presidential behavior.
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
Oh but they are, hence the problem. What you believe the Supreme Court does not, which fucks you good and hard...
It all revolves around how one defines 'jurisdiction' within a context or framework of valid residency.

Change the interpretation of 'jurisdiction' in this context and the barriers drop at the speed of light.

It remains to be seen whether that can be accomplished.

Although, it is beginning to look as though twe might learn the answer to that question in the not-too-distant future.

Sounds like great fun.
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
Aliens are not diplomats. Diplomats have immunity from US jurisdiction. Where are you getting the alien exemption from?
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

Really? Then why were we able to arrest, and will be able to prosecute, the illegal who shot that woman that the RW'ers have been ranting about?
 
Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Aliens and diplomats are NOT subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
Oh but they are, hence the problem. What you believe the Supreme Court does not, which fucks you good and hard...
It all revolves around how one defines 'jurisdiction' within a context or framework of valid residency.

Change the interpretation of 'jurisdiction' in this context and the barriers drop at the speed of light.

It remains to be seen whether that can be accomplished.

Although, it is beginning to look as though twe might learn the answer to that question in the not-too-distant future.

Sounds like great fun.
The court set the rule on this, in this case, over 100 years ago...
 
Go Jindal. I really like him too. The left/dems are so EMPTY all they have left is trying to change the Conversation. DON'T LET THEM. Video at the site

SNIP:
Bobby Jindal Turns Hillary’s Criticism Of The Term ‘Anchor Baby’ Around On Her
Share On FacebookShare On Twitter





Nicely done.

Via The Blaze:

When asked by Fox News on Thursday whether the term “anchor baby” is “offensive,” as suggested by Hillary Clinton, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal deflected the question and explained what he does find offensive.

“You know, what I find offensive is Hillary Clinton, the left, when you look at those Planned Parenthood videos — they refuse to call them babies, they call it fetal tissue, they call them specimens,” Jindal said during a Fox News interview. “That’s what offensive.”

Jindal then made sure to note that Planned Parenthood is “protesting against my decision to cancel their Medicaid contract to make sure they are not getting taxpayer dollars in Louisiana.”

“What we’re going to do is display those Planned Parenthood videos so people are reminded of that grotesque language,” he added. What’s really offensive is the left refuses to say ‘babies.’ Instead they say fetal tissue, specimens. They are a bunch of science deniers.”

Clinton recently lectured Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush for using the term “anchor babies.” She responded to him in a tweet, saying, “They’re called babies.”

all of it here:
Bobby Jindal Turns Hillary’s Criticism Of The Term ‘Anchor Baby’ Around On Her
 
You show your ignorance by claiming people are here illegally. Babies are born while the mother is here on student visa's, work visa's, tourist visa's. A girl here on a "green card" that allows her to work here for two to ten years can be the mother of what are being called "anchor babies".

they aren't american citizens...green cards and student visas don't grant citizenship.

Deport. ALL. Illegals.
The children of legal visitors to this country are being referred to as anchor babies, insinuating that they are born for the purpose of gaining citizenship. It is a stereotype and the reporter was not telling Trump he needed to be PC or that he was being offensive to everyone. He was informing him that at least to some people, the term was offensive. Instead of Trump being showing some sensitivity or diplomacy, he gave the answer her gave. Some think it was not a sign of Presidential behavior.

You might think its offense but I think its calling a spade, a spade.

If the PC police don't like it, tough shit.

As for the kids of visitors?? There is no reason for them to even hear the term anchor baby because they weren't born here. They are visiting.

If that's the best you can do, don't bother.
 
...The court set the rule on this, in this case, over 100 years ago...
All it takes is a re-submit, from a different angle, in a different context, and things could change, dramatically, in the blink of an eye.

The presence of an existing judicial ruling does not bar the government nor the People from seeking a revisiting of an old issue.
 
Here is the bottom line, left loons. Normal people are damn sick and tired of your political correct BS. You've worn it out, it has no bite anymore
 

Forum List

Back
Top