Another record! June was the hottest month ever recorded on Earth

[Redfish]

Because we prefer to do things that matter.

The more intelligent people understand the concept of LEADING BY EXAMPLE. You can't expect someone else to do something uncomfortable if you don't do it yourself.

oh, right, sacrifice for the common good------------like Oprah, Lebron, Beyonce, Biden, Obozo etc. oh and lets add the druggies Madonna, Cher, and most of hollywood.

 

[Concerned American]

pollution of our air and water

And homeless trash heaps in blue state shitholes.

 

[jknowgood]

As many as you'd like to pay for. Not you alone, but all those who say nuclear power is the mostest awesome thing.

More practical people point out that costs matter, and nuclear power is ungodly expensive. You can get far more bang for the buck with renewables.

Now that's funny, name one reneable enegy source that is reliable as nuclear.

 

[Redfish]

Well, no. Gore was rich long berore then.

I'll give you points at least for putting forth a new bit of dumb propaganda.

how did he get rich? he inherited it, how did his father get rich? your heroes are not heroic, they are hypocrites and you are idiots for believing them.

 

[jknowgood]

how exactly are oil, coal and gas subsidized? you don't know what you are talking about. if you fools had your way we would all be living in trees or caves and eating leaves. how is it intelligent to take someones hard earned money and give it to some company solar panel company that folds in a week? makes as much sense as sending billions to Ukraine to keep them from exposing the Biden family corruption.

I know the government makes more off gas than the companies do.

 

[mamooth]

how did he get rich?

By starting a cable TV network.

How Al Gore amassed a $200-million fortune after presidential defeat

Al Gore couldn't yet call himself a multimillionaire when he briefly slipped from public life after his presidential election loss to George W. Bush. Here's…

financialpost.com

 

[mamooth]

Now that's funny, name one reneable enegy source that is reliable as nuclear.

Reliable isn't the point. Cost is. If you can't afford it, it won't be there to be reliable.

 

[mamooth]

oh, right, sacrifice for the common good------------like Oprah, Lebron, Beyonce, Biden, Obozo etc. oh and lets add the druggies Madonna, Cher, and most of hollywood.

Was there any point at all to that meltdown? Hollywood has nothing to do with global warming.

 

[Concerned American]

The Evidence Is Clear, Denying It Isn't Helping Anyone.

This is terrifying news. We need to take action now before it's too late.

Our planet is in trouble and we are all responsible for fixing it.
Governments aren't doing enough.

Individual actions matter too. We should reduce our carbon footprint by using public transportation or electric cars instead of gasoline ones, reducing energy consumption at home etc.

The transition to electric cars is threatened if Donald Trump becomes president because he lives in the 20th century. He advocates gasoline cars only.
He came out against electric cars last week.

If you believe humans have a significant impact in a global warming, Donald Trump is not your candidate.

Globe has hottest June on record as well as hottest day, data shows

News of the global extremes comes amid other indicators of human-caused climate change.

www.axios.com

Better go turn off your AC. While your at it--you waste far too much energy with your online activities. Please log off now.

 

[Markle]

Gore Rule invoked. Thread over.

The first person to invoke Gore forfeits the thread for their own side, because they've admitted they have nothing.

Those who can, they talk about the issues. Those who can't, they deflect by bringing up politics.

I'm sorry to disrupt your day.

Truth is, Gore film has 9 errors, British judge rules​

Originally published October 12, 2007 at 12:00 am Updated October 12, 2007 at 6:53 am

A British judge has ruled the Oscar-winning film on global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," contains "nine errors. " High Court Judge Michael...

Truth is, Gore film has 9 errors, British judge rules

A british judge has ruled the Oscar-winning film on global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," contains "nine errors. " High Court Judge Michael...

www.seattletimes.com

 

[Markle]

I'd love to address the issue.

How many new nuclear power plants should we build?

I believe 12 to start with.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's been pointed out to Frank multiple times that this is a faked quote.

Climate Sensitivity per the IPCC

So Co2 clumped over North America and fled Greenland????? Not all obsessions are based on facts. We have lots of greenhouse warming right now but still have ice at the poles, over Greenland, Northern Canada, Northern Europe and Russia. The southernmost tip of Greenland is at approximately...

www.usmessageboard.com

He knows it. He repeats it anyways. Because that's how deniers behave. That's why everyone correctly assumes anything a denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise.


And there's the "DERP! DERP! DERRRRRRP! IT'S BEEN HOT BEFORE SOMEWHERE, SO GLOBAL WARMING IS HOAX! DERRRRRRRRRPPPPPP!" whine.

Deniers really are the dumbest pissheads on the planet, in addition to being the most dishonest.

Faked quote? You’ve tried everything to explain it away, and only make yourself look sillier each time

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As many as you'd like to pay for. Not you alone, but all those who say nuclear power is the mostest awesome thing.

More practical people point out that costs matter, and nuclear power is ungodly expensive. You can get far more bang for the buck with renewables.

What’s the cost of not being able to provide baseline electricity?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I will never understand why the left won't deal with the real problem of air and water pollution instead of making up bullshit about climate change.

I am not sure how old you are, but if you were around in the 70s you would know that air and water pollution now is is 100 times better than it was back then. It has been dealt with, and you normally whine about the regulations for doing so.

 

[BackAgain]

And there's the "It's the UHI" fable repeated again.



And there''s the "It's the sun" fable.



And there's the "BECAUSE I SAY SO!" fallacy.



And the "DERP! IF YOU CAN"T FORCE CHINA TO OBEY INSTANTLY, GLOBAL WARMING IS HOAX, DEEEERRRRRRRP!" whining, ironically spouting commie propaganda.

Deniers just have a very limited number of dumb talking points in their arsenal, and we've seen all of those dumb talking points here. It doesn't matter if they see their dumb talking points get debunked over and over, they still repeat them. It's not like they can be honest, so that forces them to deflect with the dumb talking points.

Just because you label something a fable doesn’t make it a fable, manboob.

 

[Concerned American]

I am not sure how old you are, but if you were around in the 70s you would know that air and water pollution now is is 100 times better than it was back then. It has been dealt with, and you normally whine about the regulations for doing so.

Saving Our Dying Waters — 50 Years Ago and Today | The Saturday Evening Post

An article published 50 years ago described America's dangerous water pollution problem. Here is what has changed (and what hasn't) in half a century.

www.saturdayeveningpost.com

 

[jknowgood]

Reliable isn't the point. Cost is. If you can't afford it, it won't be there to be reliable.

You stated it cheaper, than nuclear. Prove your point, and show me how much reliable it is.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As many as you'd like to pay for. Not you alone, but all those who say nuclear power is the mostest awesome thing.

More practical people point out that costs matter, and nuclear power is ungodly expensive. You can get far more bang for the buck with renewables.

More practical people point out that costs matter, and nuclear power is ungodly expensive.

It's expensive because there is no standard design and because greentards like to sue.

If we had 2 standard designs and eliminated endless lawsuits, they'd be much cheaper to build.

But they provide reliable, CO2 free power, so I see why the greens hate them.

You can get far more bang for the buck with renewables.

Until you figure out that when you include the cost of the backup for your unreliable wind
and solar, they really aren't that cheap.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well first, because they subsidize fossil fuels and nuclear much, much more.

And second, because it's an intelligent thing to do. Left to its own devices, the free market would fail hard here. Markets respond too slowly to a crisis. It's the job of government to look ahead.

If deniers had their way, humanity would be left shivering in the dark, forever.

Well first, because they subsidize fossil fuels and nuclear much, much more.

But they don't.

Markets respond too slowly to a crisis. It's the job of government to look ahead.

Look ahead, and create a new crisis.

If deniers had their way, humanity would be left shivering in the dark, forever.

Shivering in the dark, like what happens when the sun sets and the wind slows?
Or are you counting on coal, natural gas and nuclear backup for your "green" energy?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's been pointed out to Frank multiple times that this is a faked quote.

Climate Sensitivity per the IPCC

So Co2 clumped over North America and fled Greenland????? Not all obsessions are based on facts. We have lots of greenhouse warming right now but still have ice at the poles, over Greenland, Northern Canada, Northern Europe and Russia. The southernmost tip of Greenland is at approximately...

www.usmessageboard.com

He knows it. He repeats it anyways. Because that's how deniers behave. That's why everyone correctly assumes anything a denier says is a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise.


And there's the "DERP! DERP! DERRRRRRP! IT'S BEEN HOT BEFORE SOMEWHERE, SO GLOBAL WARMING IS HOAX! DERRRRRRRRRPPPPPP!" whine.

Deniers really are the dumbest pissheads on the planet, in addition to being the most dishonest.

Prior to 1850, the climate never changed!!!