CONSERVATIVE ICON GOES DOWN: HOLLY ‘HOBBY LOBBY’ FISHER ADMITS TO CHEATING ON VETERAN HUSBAND

I suspect that Righties will swing by and say that they never heard of her...

Imagine that: a good, G-d fearing Conservative woman who allows another man other than her husband to part her legs and re-enact Germany's invasion of Poland...

Those are some, uh, interesting "family values"!

I guess on of the Liberal icons using a cigar as a sex toy is perfectly OK.

Thats not cool...You dont just ruin a cigar like that

Apparently it was cool. Liberals gave Clinton a pass.

Clinton was the 90's, and I don't recall any statements by him judging others. It's not about cheating, it's about be a phony, self righteous hypocrite.

If the truth were told, half of the self righteous have probably cheated, and half of those with members of their same sex. Self hate breeds bigotry.
So morals are only relevant if you try to live your life as a moral person. I get it.

Democrats have no need to follow society's rules.

Straw Man Alert!!
 
"It's a private matter..."


if her ilk had their way, the government would need to look into protecting every sperm that went into her vajayay.

You're confused, you're thinking of ObamaCare


not really, i'm thinking of the insanity of sanctimonious nitwits who support mandated vaginal ultrasounds and personhood laws.

on the other hand the government saw a copy of your colonoscopy which prompted an internal memo that you need a root canal. ;)

LOL, how true.
 
I guess on of the Liberal icons using a cigar as a sex toy is perfectly OK.

Thats not cool...You dont just ruin a cigar like that

Apparently it was cool. Liberals gave Clinton a pass.

Clinton was the 90's, and I don't recall any statements by him judging others. It's not about cheating, it's about be a phony, self righteous hypocrite.

If the truth were told, half of the self righteous have probably cheated, and half of those with members of their same sex. Self hate breeds bigotry.
So morals are only relevant if you try to live your life as a moral person. I get it.

Democrats have no need to follow society's rules.

Straw Man Alert!!

Relevant observations are straw men now?

Is not this thread an attack on the morality of a Conservative? Did you not claim hypocrisy?
 
I guess on of the Liberal icons using a cigar as a sex toy is perfectly OK.

Thats not cool...You dont just ruin a cigar like that

Apparently it was cool. Liberals gave Clinton a pass.

Clinton was the 90's, and I don't recall any statements by him judging others. It's not about cheating, it's about be a phony, self righteous hypocrite.

If the truth were told, half of the self righteous have probably cheated, and half of those with members of their same sex. Self hate breeds bigotry.
So morals are only relevant if you try to live your life as a moral person. I get it.

Democrats have no need to follow society's rules.

Straw Man Alert!!

Says the one that denies what I posted is true because he says I provided no proof but has yet to provide proof of his training then demands I believe he has it.
 
"You may decide, for instance, what many people on the left and the right think—that I'm a sociopath and blah blah blah," says Charles C. Johnson.

You mean this guy, fired from 2 conservative publications and has this to say about himself? He is a fraud.
And let's go back to July, shall we?
Meet Holly A Lying Right-Wing 8216 Christian 8217 Taliban Extremist Ammosexual Whackjob Images Americans Against the Tea Party

This is a sick, sick liberal attack.

Maybe by liberal you mean conservative. Because the author is a con....you know that right?
 
This is a sick, sick liberal attack. Because this woman tweeted her baby lost, born with heart conditions, lost her pediatric cardiologist under Obamacare, some libs have chosen to take her down.
And on top of that they followed her twitter, saw she was pro life, and posted a pic of herself in front of hobby lobby, they even nicknamed her holly hobby lobby??


Talk about vicious beyond comprehension. What is scary is if you dare expose yourself to the left in anyway, telling your story they don't want people to hear, they will do everything in their power to destroy them-even with vicious lies. We have seen it happen too many times.
What is this world coming to?

It's why there are mass graves at the end of every Progressive Rainbow, they're the sickest and most vile and evil people who ever walked the face of the Earth
 
2 words: bill clinton

Exactly.

Its like people are forever stuck in preadolescence.

His sex life was between him and his wife. Our concern is what he did as president which was that he left a fat surplus for Geo Bush to squander.

Oh?

So it's OK that he goes to Lolita Island to fuck 15 and 16 year old girls????

Really???


That is illegal. Evidence? Photos? Videos? Eyewitness reports? Police depositions? Trail briefs?

Semen stained blue dress?
 
"You may decide, for instance, what many people on the left and the right think—that I'm a sociopath and blah blah blah," says Charles C. Johnson.

You mean this guy, fired from 2 conservative publications and has this to say about himself? He is a fraud.
And let's go back to July, shall we?
Meet Holly A Lying Right-Wing 8216 Christian 8217 Taliban Extremist Ammosexual Whackjob Images Americans Against the Tea Party

This is a sick, sick liberal attack.

Maybe by liberal you mean conservative. Because the author is a con....you know that right?


Ok, but that doesnt make him less of a con because he's been fired before lol
 
And here you are....leaving it alone :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Just showing leftist hypocrisy.

By engaging in it? Yeah...ok

That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.
 
Just showing leftist hypocrisy.

By engaging in it? Yeah...ok

That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.
 
By engaging in it? Yeah...ok

That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.

What? You had to throw your back out on that one
 
That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.

What? You had to throw your back out on that one

You had to pucker up to Clinton's ass in order to give him a pass while chastising someone professing the same religious beliefs. Your lips must really be chapped kissing his ass, Obama's ass, and Hillary's vagina.
 
I suspect that Righties will swing by and say that they never heard of her...

Imagine that: a good, G-d fearing Conservative woman who allows another man other than her husband to part her legs and re-enact Germany's invasion of Poland...

Those are some, uh, interesting "family values"!

I guess on of the Liberal icons using a cigar as a sex toy is perfectly OK.


Did I ever say it was ok? Nope.

But I do love watching the RW butthurt on parade. Really, it is apparently the only thing Righties have these days, in between bouts of grunting uncontrollably and scraping their knuckles and farting out their asses and such.

Plenty of you retards did. You said what he did in private was his business and it was the same as what you chastise Holly for now.
Clinton never preached to others about immorality.
Holly and her lay do it incessantly.
 
Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.

What? You had to throw your back out on that one

You had to pucker up to Clinton's ass in order to give him a pass while chastising someone professing the same religious beliefs. Your lips must really be chapped kissing his ass, Obama's ass, and Hillary's vagina.

Because once again, its not about religion. Now argue with yourself. Peace!
 
By engaging in it? Yeah...ok

That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.
Nope, not true. No one has any expectation that a Christian will adhere completely to biblical scriptures. The expectation is everyone falls short; so merely proclaiming ones self a Christian in no way injects their sex life onto the public. The folks from Hobby Lobby injected their sexual preferences onto the public willingly, so yes, they are fair game.
 
That she cheated is wrong. That Clinton cheated is wrong. Difference is lefties chastise her and said Clinton's actions were private.


Both are private actions except one made her private decisions her gimmick to be famous. Now you want to pretend its the same as someone else who didnt

Clinton claimed to be a follower of the same religion as Holly. By doing that, he made it public.
Being of a religion is in no way injecting ones sex life onto the public. Your desperation is noted, however.

When the religion one is professing believes what you chastise Holly Fisher for is wrong, when you profess it, you claim you support it. Your hypocrisy is noted.
Nope, not true. No one has any expectation that a Christian will adhere completely to biblical scriptures. The expectation is everyone falls short; so merely proclaiming ones self a Christian in no way injects their sex life onto the public. The folks from Hobby Lobby injected their sexual preferences onto the public willingly, so yes, they are fair game.

Difference is when Holly falls short, you chastise her. When Bill fell short, he gets a pass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top