norwegen
Diamond Member
Well, he was crucified before the rebellion. But according to the NT, he promised to come for the rebellion. To judge.Yes. I think Jesus was trying to avoid the rebellion that would destroy the Jews.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, he was crucified before the rebellion. But according to the NT, he promised to come for the rebellion. To judge.Yes. I think Jesus was trying to avoid the rebellion that would destroy the Jews.
Then I would applaud them for their logic. After all, God loves logic. He is logic, among other things.What if they taught you it’s not ok?
I understand that you cannot connect with the concept of divorce because it’s forbidden in the NT.
That's nice. I hope that gave you some joy and comfort to tell me that.Obviously the RCC did not count countless murders as being forbidden by the Big 10.
The only way to respond to wrong doing is to do right.Then I would applaud them for their logic. After all, God loves logic. He is logic, among other things.
I absolutely can connect with the concept of divorce even if it is in the NT and the dogma taught by my faith. Do you know why? No one is perfect. They sin. I sin. Hopefully we learn from our mistakes and progress. To me the real question is how we - as a society, a community, a neighborhood or a family - respond to other people's mistakes. Why is that the real question for me? Because I can only control what I do.
Not at all.That's nice. I hope that gave you some joy and comfort to tell me that.
She didn't mention Jesus. She mentioned faith.You’re counting 2 major religions that don’t believe in Jesus.
Yes, I know. Still, Jesus' main audience were the poor in rural areas. People were poor, and despite that--perhaps because of it--Jesus was encouraging hospitality--a hallmark of Judaism. Many Jews lost their land to Rome and became peasants working on land that was once theirs. I imagine Jews were more likely asked to crop burdens for their landlords than a pack for a Roman soldier. The main point is that everyone needed help, so lend a hand. And yes, if a Roman soldier asked someone to carry their pack, help them out.A Roman soldier's pack weighed nearly 60 pounds.
Well, he was crucified before the rebellion. But according to the NT, he promised to come for the rebellion. To judge.
My relationship with God is very much like my relationship with a best friend or spouse. We don't always agree but we always work it out The major difference being he's always right and I'm always wrong. I eventually come around to His way of thinking but not without a lot of griping about it first. I guess I'll have to wait to find out if He thinks I do things to spite Him. It's certainly worth considering though.You can believe that what you are doing is being done in spite of the fact that you know God exists and is all knowing.
Check Nimrod who committed pe-shah to spite God.
Probably more than that. When referencing people of faith, I include all of any faith. I am not about to exclude Hindus, Taoists, or for that matter, anyone who focuses on the Great Spirit. People who believe understand that belief has many facets. People are not cookie stamps of one another.You’re counting 2 major religions that don’t believe in Jesus.
yea, okay.Yes he was crucified before the rebellion, but the Jews were divided against each other long before open rebellion. Essenes moved to the wilderness.. zealots opposed the Herodians... Saducees and Pharisees vied for control. Some Jews prospered under the Romans.
Perhaps not the same thing, but surely something. From what I understand, if Uriah went away and died in battle, the divorce he gave his wife would have begun at the time of the writ. So...even though David had sex with Bathsheba before Uriah's death, upon Uriah's death, that act was covered by the divorce. In other words (an analogy), David went to his accountant and cleverly found a loophole.I guess adultery didn't mean the same thing back then. It's a wonder it ever made it as a commandment.
Thank you, I am honored you think of me at all.Truth is I just feel sorry for you.
Sounds like the first recorded case of legal positivism (i.e. following the letter of the law instead of the spirit of the law).Perhaps not the same thing, but surely something. From what I understand, if Uriah went away and died in battle, the divorce he gave his wife would have begun at the time of the writ. So...even though David had sex with Bathsheba before Uriah's death, upon Uriah's death, that act was covered by the divorce. In other words (an analogy), David went to his accountant and cleverly found a loophole.
By all accounts David learned--or at least felt--he hadn't been so clever after all.
Perhaps not the same thing, but surely something. From what I understand, if Uriah went away and died in battle, the divorce he gave his wife would have begun at the time of the writ. So...even though David had sex with Bathsheba before Uriah's death, upon Uriah's death, that act was covered by the divorce. In other words (an analogy), David went to his accountant and cleverly found a loophole.
By all accounts David learned--or at least felt--he hadn't been so clever after all.
Well, I don't know if it was the first case. What I find interesting is that many people who missed the spirit of the law, still want to grab hold of some part of the law because they still understand the value of that Law. They reach for the letter of the law. A case of a part of a loaf being better than none at all.Sounds like the first recorded case of legal positivism (i.e. following the letter of the law instead of the spirit of the law).
I'm a little more cynical than that. I believe people don't care about the spirit of the law and only do things for their self interest.Well, I don't know if it was the first case. What I find interesting is that many people who missed the spirit of the law, still want to grab hold of some part of the law because they still understand the value of that Law. They reach for the letter of the law. A case of a part of a loaf being better than none at all.
The NT was politically correct. Christianity had to live with Roman rule and to have your religion's founder know as an anti-Roman revolutionary was a bad idea. You can see this evolution in the NT. The Romans are incrementally exonerated for Jesus' execution while the Jews are incrementally blamed.Exactly. Because no passage in the NT relates such sentiment.
Not to me.What you think is irrelevant.
Ironic that the religion of Jesus became the religion about Jesus.The NT divides the Jews of the era: some are sheep; some are goats. Jews are the people Jesus came to minister to.
Why take chances or pass up a chance to make an example.Not much of a threat to the Roman Empire, then, was he..
Temporarily to put down a rebellion and probably wasn't there in Jesus' time. It went where it was needed.The 10th Legion was deployed in Judea.
Thank you, I am honored you think of me at all.
The NT was politically correct. Christianity had to live with Roman rule and to have your religion's founder know as an anti-Roman revolutionary was a bad idea. You can see this evolution in the NT. The Romans are incrementally exonerated for Jesus' execution while the Jews are incrementally blamed.
Not to me.
Ironic that the religion of Jesus became the religion about Jesus.
Why take chances or pass up a chance to make an example.
Temporarily to put down a rebellion and probably wasn't there in Jesus' time. It went where it was needed.