I'll be fine. You will definitely need yours if you want to come visit, though.Let's see. Just make sure that you have your paperwork at the border.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll be fine. You will definitely need yours if you want to come visit, though.Let's see. Just make sure that you have your paperwork at the border.
True.The whole thing is pointless. You would not have those defense contracts when it was done and over with. For as much trash that is talked by the state governments in regard to the federal government, Texas, and the people living there, are in fact highly dependent on the federal government.
True.
The notion of Texas, or any other state, for that matter, 'leaving' the Union is idiocy, as well as un-Constitutional.
I'll be fine. You will definitely need yours if you want to come visit, though.
No my dear...you aren't even close. You're under 30, though.Hmmmmmmm.........you're under forty.
No my dear...you aren't even close. You're under 30, though.
I'm willing to give it a try.
Louisiana and Texas could survive on their own without the fed gvt...if another 10 states or so joined, all the better.
Welcome! We'd be glad to have you.Where Texas and Louisiana go, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Missouri follow.
Good for you. We wish you all the luck in the world.Why would Alaska go back to Russia or join Canada? I believe we would attempt to be sovereign.
Your condescending tone and arrogant attitude don't make you look smarter.
Collapse, partitioning and reconstruction are what is in the future for this country.
It's a perfectly natural and normal event in human endeavors.
All governments collapse, usually there is bloodshed and ethnic cleansing due to old grievances, then partitioning to keep the two apart...then reconstruction of the various partitioned sections....just like the balkans
like I said...
Your condescending tone and arrogant attitude don't make you look smarter.
I agree. My tone was misplaced, and I apologize for that. I'm getting too old to work 18 hour days/nights and still be cogent! But I stand by what I said, tho....said another way, multi-culturalism is the death knell of our nation. It has never worked. Just like liberalism.
Of course, by the USFG, but no doubt the Republic of Texas would, as a sovereign nation, replace some or all of them. It is still a net win of 50 billion a year for Texas.Every military base, every defense contractor, every dollar for education and medical.............gone............like that.
Make sure you have your paperwork in order at the border!
Can you point out in the constitution where it says that states can't leave the Union? I know the USFG can militarily prevent it from happening, and has in the past, but not on the basis of anything explicitly in the constitution rather by fiat.True.
The notion of Texas, or any other state, for that matter, 'leaving' the Union is idiocy, as well as un-Constitutional.
Welcome! We'd be glad to have you.
Precisely correct.Adding those additional states would make the resulting "Greater Texas" political entity the eighth largest economy in the world (2009 numbers, just like the state GDP ones), just behind Italy and the UK. Larger than India, believe it or not, but of course a much larger per capita. All of the states save Louisiana net pay more to the USFG than they get back, but even taking that into account there's still a net gain of 66 billion for the five states if they didn't pay DC.
It mystifies me that people think Texas could not make it on its own, or a smaller union of states would likewise be doomed to failure. Many smaller countries do just fine governing themselves. These states already have fully functioning governments, they would just take on some more duties in replacing the bloated and inefficient USFG and still save tens of billions per year even if they replaced every single function/program/welfare etc.
Oil And Natural Gas And Minerals Production |
Petroleum Refining |
Chemicals And Petrochemicals |
Tourism |
Shipbuilding |
Forestry and Forest Products |
Agriculture and Food Processing |
Commercial Fishing |
Shipping and International Commerce |
General Manufacturing |
Aerospace/Aviation |
Biotechnology |
Of course, by the USFG, but no doubt the Republic of Texas would, as a sovereign nation, replace some or all of them. It is still a net win of 50 billion a year for Texas.Every military base, every defense contractor, every dollar for education and medical.............gone............like that.
Make sure you have your paperwork in order at the border!
It seems you're having difficulty with the concept of net. Of course Texas as a whole would lose USFG funding, though not necessarily USFG contracts to produce weapons, or certainly not necessarily all of them. However, this would more than be made up by the elimination of USFG taxes. The difference, as I've pointed out, is 50 billion a year. Even if Texas decides to replace every single USFG program currently in place with one of their own, the state would still be 50 billion a year richer. It's unlikely that Texas would repeat all of the mistakes of the USFG, so that's even more savings.
So, larger population than many successful countries, GDP that would put it in the top 30 in the world, natural resources, and access to the oceans. Texas would make a great country. Not a superpower like the US or China, of course, but who wants that sort of expense and headache anyway?