frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,359
- 9,856
- 2,030
Why do you support increasing spending on nuclear weapons and stopping a fighter jet, the F-35, that has already had $1.5 trillion spent on it? And there are orders from various countries to buy this, like the UK which has spent $7 billion on a new aircraft carrier that can only fly this plane?
Why do you frame your question with a fallacious assumption that I support what you are then about to ask?
I don't know a ton about the specifics of the contracts on these projects and the associated opportunity costs for changing the current direction.
Your claim that $1.5 trillion was already spent on the F-35 is false. In 2012, the total 50 year life-cycle cost for the entire U.S. fleet was estimated at US$1.51 trillion.
Let's stick with facts, please.
If the F-35 is having serious cost overruns and design issues and is not performing as expected, I would certainly support a change.
Firstly, you said this was about learning about Trump supporters. Yes, I'm being a little bit over the top, deliberately so, because Trump supporters have shown in the past they'll support anything Trump says.
Remember: "
Trump: I could 'shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters'"????
Donald Trump could 'shoot somebody and not lose voters' - CNNPolitics.com
So even though I am being a little bit on the jokey side, the reality is still there.
Okay, you're right about the costs. However the point was that a lot of money has been spent on this aircraft, a lot of diplomacy has been put into this aircraft, to get rid of it now would be an expensive problem.
The problem is that if it is having cost overruns, who's to say another aircraft wouldn't have such overruns? The US needs a jet that is going to last a long time. It's not performing as expected? Would another aircraft perform better?
The project should be audited closely, as I am sure it currently is, but by a new group. If the aircraft is not going to perform as expected, changes need to be made. Scrapping the entire program and flushing it down the toilet as if it never existed is not the only alternative to no change.
But then Trump has no idea about this project. He sees figures on a piece of paper, then changes them, then decides he doesn't like it.
I didn't see the news on that. What specific changes did he make to the project? How were those changes made? I was not aware he could do anything policy wise prior to being sworn in.
Er... what? I didn't say he made changes to the project. I said he made changes to the figures on the piece of paper. Like he sees $10 and then tells everyone it's $50.