I'm Leaving the Conservative Party

[Synthaholic]

Rubio was elected to the US Senate

So was Barbara Boxer. What's your point?

The comparison to Obama is spot on. Obama accomplished much less then Rubio while a Jr. Senator...Rubio has star power without the hype...he is known without having run as POTUS. Boxer is a divisive Senator who has no star power even though she has been in office longer then most.

That you don't like the point is your problem, not mine or Franks.

I'm not making a comparison. You are trying to, to deflect from your empty suit teabagger.

What has Rubio accomplished?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I already told you, your answer was a garbled mess.

I'm not here to train you

You're not here to string together a coherent sentence either, apparently.

Only the stupid can't comprehend what was said.

 

[Synthaholic]

There you go again did bush get approval from congress yes or no?
Now why aren't you and the left attacking bush because of the patriot act? Maybe it's because obama is a big supporter of that garbage also?

No.

Congress gave Bush the authority to strap on the guns, not to go in like Yosemite Sam in the saloon.

The Left did attack Bush over the Patriot Act. Does Obama have the power to cancel that Act?

No.

You need to see a doctor about that reality problem you have.

If you think I am incorrect, then prove it.

You won't. You can't.

 

[Synthaholic]

As a Jr. Senator he has managed to create a coalition of agreement on issues important to conservatives. Something that a person like you easily dismisses as an accomplish I am sure..

Tell us what had Obama "accomplished" as a Jr. Senator prior to running for president?

Rubio is a star because he is able to articulate in an intelligent manner, a vision that unites conservatives...no small talent within a political party.

Where are you getting this bullshit? You can't even point to one widely celebrated speech from Rubio.

And we're not talking about Obama. No deflections.

Don't think acting like a moron makes you look smart, it doesn't. The comparison to Obama is valid since at the same time in his career as a Jr. Senator he was a basic unknown- yet the same cannot be said of Rubio.

Rubio's distinct accomplishment as a Jr Senator is that he is a dynamic star in the republican party. He is a Jr. Senator, yet commands respect and encourages enthusiasm.

Tell us- what were Obama's accomplishments as an unknown Jr. Senator?

Why are you deflecting to Obama?

I'll tell you why: Rubio is a fraud and you cannot point to any achievement of his.

 

[Synthaholic]

There you go again did bush get approval from congress yes or no?
Now why aren't you and the left attacking bush because of the patriot act? Maybe it's because obama is a big supporter of that garbage also?

No.

Congress gave Bush the authority to strap on the guns, not to go in like Yosemite Sam in the saloon.

The Left did attack Bush over the Patriot Act. Does Obama have the power to cancel that Act?

No.

Dumb ass stupid son of a bitch. Congress gave Bush authority to go to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Also obama could have let the patriot act die but he signed to extend it.
He owns it now.
He also owns the NDAA's 2012 indefinite detention

Prove it. But first explain what "go to Iraq" means.

 

[Synthaholic]

I did answer your question instead of following every post I make take the time and go back and read

What's so hard about answering yes or no?

I'll show you how to do it:

Bush 1st term: No
Bush 2nd term: No

Is this beyond your abilities?

Stupid before you respond to a post you should know the history of the discussion I answered the question

No you didn't. You typed a bunch of gibberish.

What are you afraid of?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No.

Congress gave Bush the authority to strap on the guns, not to go in like Yosemite Sam in the saloon.

The Left did attack Bush over the Patriot Act. Does Obama have the power to cancel that Act?

No.

You need to see a doctor about that reality problem you have.

If you think I am incorrect, then prove it.

You won't. You can't.

You need help
President Obama, Congress passes bill to extend Patriot Act despite Sen. Rand Paul delay - New York Daily News

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ243/html/PLAW-107publ243.htm

[107th Congress Public Law 243]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


<DOC>
[DOCID: fubl243.107]


[[Page 1497]]

AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002

[[Page 116 STAT. 1498]]

Public Law 107-243
107th Congress

Joint Resolution



To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against
Iraq. <<NOTE: Oct. 16, 2002 - [H.J. Res. 114]>>

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What's so hard about answering yes or no?

I'll show you how to do it:

Bush 1st term: No
Bush 2nd term: No

Is this beyond your abilities?

Stupid before you respond to a post you should know the history of the discussion I answered the question

No you didn't. You typed a bunch of gibberish.

What are you afraid of?

What post was it dumb ass?

 

[HUGGY]

Frankie is an idiot. There is no "conservative party" in the U S.

 

[Dragonlady]

Stupid before you respond to a post you should know the history of the discussion I answered the question

I light of your continued refusal to answer a simply yes or not question, we can only assume that you voted for Bush on both occasions, that you subsequently came down with a case of buyer's remorse, are now ashamed to admit it. There are can no other reasonable explanation as to why you avoid answering.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Stupid before you respond to a post you should know the history of the discussion I answered the question

I light of your continued refusal to answer a simply yes or not question, we can only assume that you voted for Bush on both occasions, that you subsequently came down with a case of buyer's remorse, are now ashamed to admit it. There are can no other reasonable explanation as to why you avoid answering.

Do you even know what post is being talked about?

 

[beagle9]

lol

Okay…

What would be the ‘right’ reasons to attack Bush?

Or were his pointless, illegal wars the ‘right’ thing to do?

Oh, how about spending and expanding bureaucracy on a magnitude that progressive/socialist hacks like you have wet dreams about, when the prez in question has a (D) by his name?

Wrong again, dope.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/265791-obama-spending-binge-never-happened.html

Hmmm, so why is Obama scared to spend money then ? What's he holding back for ? Is he trying to break the nation or certain ones who are in the nation, and if so for what ?

 

[Harry Dresden]

lol

Okay…

What would be the ‘right’ reasons to attack Bush?

Or were his pointless, illegal wars the ‘right’ thing to do?

Wars?.....so your saying Afghanistan was Illegal....so im am assuming you were one of the 10% who was against going in there....right?.....if so what should we have done in responce to what happened?.....

Killed or captured bin Laden at or before Tora Bora instead of letting him - yes, letting him - escape. It took 28 days after 9/11 to get boots on the ground in Afghanistan.

You can't have a big War on Terror, with all the huge profits to be made, if you get the bad guy within a few weeks.


"I'm really not concerned with his whereabouts"

i guess Clayton is incapable of answering questions asked of him.......but thanx for subbing for him Synth.....but getting back to the question.....to get Bin Laden they would have had to go in and get him.....apparently Jones thought that was Illegal.....thats what i am getting at.....i have no doubts Bush and Company fucked all that up....but the initial invasion was totally justified.....Jones does not think so....so i wanted him to tell me what he would have done....

 

[Oddball]

lol

Okay…

What would be the ‘right’ reasons to attack Bush?

Or were his pointless, illegal wars the ‘right’ thing to do?

Oh, how about spending and expanding bureaucracy on a magnitude that progressive/socialist hacks like you have wet dreams about, when the prez in question has a (D) by his name?

Wrong again, dope.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/265791-obama-spending-binge-never-happened.html

I was talking about Chimpy Bush, meathead.

 

[clevergirl]

Wars?.....so your saying Afghanistan was Illegal....so im am assuming you were one of the 10% who was against going in there....right?.....if so what should we have done in responce to what happened?.....

Killed or captured bin Laden at or before Tora Bora instead of letting him - yes, letting him - escape. It took 28 days after 9/11 to get boots on the ground in Afghanistan.

You can't have a big War on Terror, with all the huge profits to be made, if you get the bad guy within a few weeks.


"I'm really not concerned with his whereabouts"

i guess Clayton is incapable of answering questions asked of him.......but thanx for subbing for him Synth.....but getting back to the question.....to get Bin Laden they would have had to go in and get him.....apparently Jones thought that was Illegal.....thats what i am getting at.....i have no doubts Bush and Company fucked all that up....but the initial invasion was totally justified.....Jones does not think so....so i wanted him to tell me what he would have done....

How about we never would have had a 9/11 had Clinton taken him out when he had the location and opportunity to do so... Imagine no Afghanistan; no Iraq; no Gitmo; no Patriot Act had Clinton done his job....

Yeah libs like to go back to Bush history, but are loathe to walk it back just a few short years more.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

lol

Okay…

What would be the ‘right’ reasons to attack Bush?

Or were his pointless, illegal wars the ‘right’ thing to do?

Oh, how about spending and expanding bureaucracy on a magnitude that progressive/socialist hacks like you have wet dreams about, when the prez in question has a (D) by his name?

Wrong again, dope.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/265791-obama-spending-binge-never-happened.html

One Obama Deficit > Any Reagan Budget

One Obama Deficit > All Reagan Deficits

But the Spending binge never happened because the Lord and Savior Messiah Obama said so.

 

[musingsofacac]

I have been a registered Conservative since the first Reagan election, they best represent my principles and beliefs. But the time has come to say goodbye.

It's not that the Conservative Party has done anything wrong, it's that the Republican Party needs me, needs us more.

We, Conservatives, the base of the Party and the country, must take over the Republican Party and start to turn the country around. Our task is formidable: too many Republicans believe that Washington DC is the US Economy.

We must get involved at the local level. If we are Conservative Party members, we do not get to run the local Republican Party. It's time to send the Neo-Marxist Enablers known as Republican Moderates packing, they've done nothing but damage the brand and have lost every time they try to lead.

I feel much of your frustration - But the GOP has been putting up moderate Republican canidates since George H Bush. Theyforgot the lessons of Reagan.

To be sure George H Bush won on the coat tails of Reagan - basically people assumed that since he was Reagan's vice president he must be in line with Reagan's brand of conservativism. The reality is - he was much more moderate than Reagan, he just looked better than Michael Dukockis.

But when you put the moderate George H Bush up against the moderate Bill Clinton(and yes Bill Clinton was a moderate compared to Obama) - it caused a civil war amongest conservatives and we got Ross Perot in there to spoil the election for George H Bush and give it to Clinton(who won with less than half the vote).

Then we put up the sad moderate canidate - Bob Dole, again had no chance against the charimatic and practical Bill Clinton(who has successfully moved himself to center by 96 election).

George W Bush was more conservative than his dad, but yet still not a Reagan conservative - he had the silly "compassionate conservative" thing going on. Where he was super conservative was on low taxes(thankfully) - where he was not conservative was on immigration and spending(big spender - eg. Medicare prescription drug plan).

George W Bush though, had a very likeable personality(similar to Reagan) and he was much more likeable than the stiff canidates of Al Gore and John Kerry. So he continued to win elections(and yes I voted for him both times - and yes I voted for Bob Dole even though I knew he had no chance).

Then we had Mccain - massive moderate canidate - basically Bob Dole 2.0. Old moderate white guy war hero - this would have worked in Eikes time - but not now. Obama was younger and more charismatic - it was a slam dunk.

Then we had Romney this time around - better looking, but still a stiff. And he was successfully painted as a uncaring rich guy by Obama. But he failed to take the fight to Obama, he failed to call Obama the socialist that he really is, in short Romney failed to get his hands dirty so he he lost.

But really is it any suprise Romney could'nt get down in the trenches and get his hands dirty? Nope. That is the problem with moderates often times...they are way too nice and since they don't have a true conservative core that sees socialism as evil(as Reagan did) they will not be successful.

You see Romney would just say Obama was mistaken - if he was a Reagan - he would have called Obama's policies socialist and evil. Until we get a true Reagan conservative who is willing to take the gloves off and energize his party and the country behind him - we will keep loosing elections.

 

[bobcollum]

Romney really didn't come off as all too moderate during the campaign, in fact that's what kept swing/undecideds away from him.

Choosing Paul Ryan was the nail in the coffin of his presidential aspirations.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I have been a registered Conservative since the first Reagan election, they best represent my principles and beliefs. But the time has come to say goodbye.

It's not that the Conservative Party has done anything wrong, it's that the Republican Party needs me, needs us more.

We, Conservatives, the base of the Party and the country, must take over the Republican Party and start to turn the country around. Our task is formidable: too many Republicans believe that Washington DC is the US Economy.

We must get involved at the local level. If we are Conservative Party members, we do not get to run the local Republican Party. It's time to send the Neo-Marxist Enablers known as Republican Moderates packing, they've done nothing but damage the brand and have lost every time they try to lead.

I feel much of your frustration - But the GOP has been putting up moderate Republican canidates since George H Bush. Theyforgot the lessons of Reagan.

To be sure George H Bush won on the coat tails of Reagan - basically people assumed that since he was Reagan's vice president he must be in line with Reagan's brand of conservativism. The reality is - he was much more moderate than Reagan, he just looked better than Michael Dukockis.

But when you put the moderate George H Bush up against the moderate Bill Clinton(and yes Bill Clinton was a moderate compared to Obama) - it caused a civil war amongest conservatives and we got Ross Perot in there to spoil the election for George H Bush and give it to Clinton(who won with less than half the vote).

Then we put up the sad moderate canidate - Bob Dole, again had no chance against the charimatic and practical Bill Clinton(who has successfully moved himself to center by 96 election).

George W Bush was more conservative than his dad, but yet still not a Reagan conservative - he had the silly "compassionate conservative" thing going on. Where he was super conservative was on low taxes(thankfully) - where he was not conservative was on immigration and spending(big spender - eg. Medicare prescription drug plan).

George W Bush though, had a very likeable personality(similar to Reagan) and he was much more likeable than the stiff canidates of Al Gore and John Kerry. So he continued to win elections(and yes I voted for him both times - and yes I voted for Bob Dole even though I knew he had no chance).

Then we had Mccain - massive moderate canidate - basically Bob Dole 2.0. Old moderate white guy war hero - this would have worked in Eikes time - but not now. Obama was younger and more charismatic - it was a slam dunk.

Then we had Romney this time around - better looking, but still a stiff. And he was successfully painted as a uncaring rich guy by Obama. But he failed to take the fight to Obama, he failed to call Obama the socialist that he really is, in short Romney failed to get his hands dirty so he he lost.

But really is it any suprise Romney could'nt get down in the trenches and get his hands dirty? Nope. That is the problem with moderates often times...they are way too nice and since they don't have a true conservative core that sees socialism as evil(as Reagan did) they will not be successful.

You see Romney would just say Obama was mistaken - if he was a Reagan - he would have called Obama's policies socialist and evil. Until we get a true Reagan conservative who is willing to take the gloves off and energize his party and the country behind him - we will keep loosing elections.

Thank you for that and welcome to USMB

I agree with all that you said. Palin correctly pointed out that the way to win against Obama was to show him for the out of touch lunatic, radical leftist he is. McCain didn't listen, he lost

Romney saved his venom and passion for Newt, whom he destroyed. When he went up against the Neo-Marxist in the White House he fought like Little Lord Fauntleroy.

We can no longer fight ourselves, we need to take back control of the Republican Party. The big money backers are not happy at losing $50-60MM each because Moderates are failures and losers and are enabling Obama. They are business people who depend upon a robust US economy, not a European welfare state.

That's why I left the Conservative Party and am now a Republican. It's time to take it back

 

[Toro]

Romney lost by 5 million. According to FoxNews, 8 million more moderates voted for Obama than Romney. Romney received the second most votes for a Republican in history.

Why is making the Republican party more conservative a winning formula?