Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think that if msnbc or George Soros had a long list of candidates that any Democrat President can choose from for SCOTUS, and only from that list were they chosen, do you think any of them would be partisan?If by partisan you mean decisions that are premised on political preferences without regard to what the law says and what the Constitution actually says and means, then no. I’m not presently seeing that.
Do you intend to claim otherwise? Cite me an example or two if you’re able.
Lefties are so damn shallow. They confirmed her solely so they could claim she was the first black woman on the court. No other reason.
pretty soon those woke proclamations are going to run out for you. Then what are you idiots going to have left?
Ronald Reagan hired someone that way, and Republicans cheered him on for it.How can you possibly know that? Only black women (7% of the population) were considered.
Would YOU hire someone that way?
Seems to be a lot of that going around.....
We had a recent President that the same folks selected for the very same reason.
And.....so did the Nobel Peace Prize committee....
She was nominated for one reason she is a black woman. Infact only black women were considered because democrats only know how to pander.And yet she still is more qualified than anyone else currently on the court based on schooling and experience.
She cant even tell us what a women is for fucks sake.
I'd call that a pretty serious gender issue.
Do you doubt that Judge Jackson is, in fact, a woman?First woman?
How the hell can you make that claim when she doesnt even know what a woman is?
But, that's different.Ronald Reagan hired someone that way, and Republicans cheered him on for it.
Mitt thinks he is punishing the Republican base for throwing him under the bus for a trump.
Does that scare them that much?
She is the best qualified.
You are being inarticulate again. By “her” I might assume you are trying to speak of Justice Jackson. OR, maybe you meant to be alluding to Ginny Thomas. If the latter, then your idiotic assumption appears to be that Ginny’s views are dictated by her husband. Quite fully sexist of you!Let us assume that her views are dictated by the justice, since we are assuming. I have every reason to doubt that there is no bias with all humans.
Do you doubt that Judge Jackson is, in fact, a woman?
Another win for the good guys.
That's not an answer.The President can pick anyone he wants, for whatever reason he wants.
That's the Constitution.
Deal with it.
A Judge is supposed to follow the law that Congress sets out.Best qualified at what?
Letting pedos of the hook?
Do you doubt that Judge Jackson is, in fact, a woman?
All of Biden’s administration picks have been some proclamation of a “first”. First Tranny…First Dog fetishized weirdo.Seems to be a lot of that going around.....
We had a recent President that the same folks selected for the very same reason.
And.....so did the Nobel Peace Prize committee....
Who are you referring to?Ronald Reagan hired someone that way, and Republicans cheered him on for it.
