Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. It does not. Try fighting it in a court of law. You'll lose bigly.They are gaining revenue from my being on the platform. They are being paid for me to be there. This gives me rights that they do not acknowledge.
Then don't use it. The TOS is by design.The TOS is so vague that any reason can be used to toss you, even your opinion.
Horseshit. It's capitalism. They created the platform, and you do not have any constitutional right to it. You lose every time thinking you do.The problem is that they have become the "town square" So just like any other business that gets this big, they have power, that they are not entitled to, over public discourse.
Remedy what? Capitalism?So, what are your suggestions to remedy that?
Go crazy.This is why the US has Anti-trust laws. Do we break them up into little companies now?
Your facts ain't facts without censoring us (Yeah, we know that)
All these double standards, man, I'm tired of the noise
Freedom's an illusion if they censor your voice.
Thanks. Consistent principle are rarity these days.What cake baking thing?
Where the gay couple sued to have a baker make their wedding cake?
I side with the business owner...
No, they don't. Also there's no federal issue.As a Mod, I assume you have siggies turned on and can see I'm not a Trump supporter, but your false claim is irrelevant regardless.
See above.
See above.
Facebook has certain obligations as a provider of public space, but let's see what SCOTUS says, shall we?
It is the platforms that want it both ways. They simultaneously want the privilege to censor content AND be protected from lawsuits based on the content they allow, so it is legitimate to call for government action. One or the other should be true, not both at the same time.Nothing.
That’s how it’s supposed to work – private citizens in the context of private society expressing their views and opinions absent interference from government or the courts.
What’s wrong is advocating that government get involved – that social media be subject to government regulation or oversight in violation of the First Amendment.
And don’t bother with the lie that conservatives can’t express their opinions because Facebook prohibits rightwing hate speech, misinformation, and lies – there are countless other online venues where conservatives can spread their lies and hate, such as this very forum.
Glad you enjoy it. I don’t.
Actually it's likely not. Target, like most big box retailers, do leasebacks. Those strip centers are owned by another property owner.Yes; but the manager doesn't remove the less fortunate who hang out there.
The manager would probably be fired and go to prison.
And if a concert venue books an act known for causing violence at their concerts and does not take steps to control such violence, it can be sued out of existence by the families of kids hurt at the concert.No matter how many times you repeat this lie, FB will never be the town square. The town square is owned by the pubic, FB is a private company. To keep with your analogy, FB is the concert arena that has every right to choose who plays there.
Yes, that's why I almost never go on it.The fact that I cannot select topic related posts.
For instance, I can ignore Threads but on FB I have to scroll through endless bullshit.
Which means what in terms of how the events actually unfold?Actually it's likely not. Target, like most big box retailers, do leasebacks. Those strip centers are owned by another property owner.
I enjoy here, it is FB that is a necessary evil that I don’t enjoy.You do not enjoy this forum? Then why come to it?
As for FB, it is a tool, I enjoy it the same way I enjoy a hammer or a screwdriver.
Find me a Red city.Do you live in a Red city?
It means Target doesn't own any "public space."Which means what in terms of how the events actually unfold?
Even if that's true, If anyone videos a manager asking a bum to leave, all hell will break out.It means Target doesn't own any "public space."
Please show pics of a Target with homeless people camped out in it.The fact is that you keep insisting that the manager will kick out bums.
The managers like their salaries and benefits and don't want to be sued.
I give up!
Until the company that owns the screw driver comes and takes it away because they don’t like the way you are using itYou do not enjoy this forum? Then why come to it?
As for FB, it is a tool, I enjoy it the same way I enjoy a hammer or a screwdriver.
.
When I have the chance; I hope I don't find any.Please show pics of a Target with homeless people camped out in it.
It’s impossible to perfectly police social media. It’s too much content.If they want to choose the content they allow, they need to be vulnerable to legal action by those damaged.
Then why are they targeting the right? If there is too much content, as you claim, then why are they policing just the right?It’s impossible to perfectly police social media. It’s too much content.
That is an assumption on your part.Then why are they targeting the right? If there is too much content, as you claim, then why are they policing just the right?
