beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 43,831
- 16,301
As is proven, nope they would never say it, and it's because well you know it's because of white privilege, otherwise it had ran out finally, so the special privileged person got what they deserved for being white as is depicted in your senario.So you assign no fault to the drunk and it was all the cops fault.Resisting arrest and stealing a taser are not death penalty offenses. The cops were never in danger from him. They shot him running away. The cop who shot him had his gun drawn and trained on him before he turned and shot back with the taser. Shooting at a cop with a taser at that distance was nothing more than a hopeless attempt at saving himself from being shot by a cop with a real gun. You must be a true racist to call this poor man a 'gangsta' -- he was drunk and asleep in his car. That is not a death penalty crime. It is not a gangster crime. Nothing he did deserved being shot and killed. Nothing.Why does everyone question the actions of the police without bothering to find out what brought about this response? The drunken thug is the one responsible for his own death. If he did not resist arrest with violence and steal the officer's tazer, if the gangsta would have acted like a civilized person he would still be alive today.
Would you say the same thing if the drunk was white? If he had acted in a civilized manner and not resisted arrest with violence he would be alive today