Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please post said video.............
The one video I saw showed one gun being removed and one shell being cleared from it by a police officer who did seem to know what he was doing though with an unfamiliar firearm. The gun could not be named from the tape but it was not an AR15. That much is certain.......
So what? Really?is that your best reply?
You dont think the hazmat crew should have handled the gun first?
You dont think it is odd that the trunk of the car was searched at night,at the scene,instead of being sealed,towed,and gone over by experts,as per police procedure?
I understand that the car was already compromised by the first responders that closed the doors,and removed evidence that was clearly seen in early footage,but yeah,...so what?
yea so what your argument such as it is falls apart when you use the phrase should have...So what? Really?is that your best reply?
You dont think the hazmat crew should have handled the gun first?
You dont think it is odd that the trunk of the car was searched at night,at the scene,instead of being sealed,towed,and gone over by experts,as per police procedure?
I understand that the car was already compromised by the first responders that closed the doors,and removed evidence that was clearly seen in early footage,but yeah,...so what?
wrong as always paulie, I reserve the tin foil hat moniker for the nuttiest of nut jobs, our new friend strikes me as a mediocre ct're who's had too much Starbucks.So what? Really?is that your best reply?
You dont think the hazmat crew should have handled the gun first?
You dont think it is odd that the trunk of the car was searched at night,at the scene,instead of being sealed,towed,and gone over by experts,as per police procedure?
I understand that the car was already compromised by the first responders that closed the doors,and removed evidence that was clearly seen in early footage,but yeah,...so what?
Just a warning. You're discussion with that Sock Troll will inevitably end with him or her ridiculing you with repetitive 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. I can't tell you what to do, but i thought i would give you the heads up. Your discussions with him or her will always end the same way...You're just a 'Tinfoil Hat-wearing Nut.' Good luck.
wrong as always paulie, I reserve the tin foil hat moniker for the nuttiest of nut jobs, our new friend strikes me as a mediocre ct're who's had too much Starbucks.So what? Really?is that your best reply?
You dont think the hazmat crew should have handled the gun first?
You dont think it is odd that the trunk of the car was searched at night,at the scene,instead of being sealed,towed,and gone over by experts,as per police procedure?
I understand that the car was already compromised by the first responders that closed the doors,and removed evidence that was clearly seen in early footage,but yeah,...so what?
Just a warning. You're discussion with that Sock Troll will inevitably end with him or her ridiculing you with repetitive 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. I can't tell you what to do, but i thought i would give you the heads up. Your discussions with him or her will always end the same way...You're just a 'Tinfoil Hat-wearing Nut.' Good luck.
ok willful ignorance man..wrong as always paulie, I reserve the tin foil hat moniker for the nuttiest of nut jobs, our new friend strikes me as a mediocre ct're who's had too much Starbucks.Just a warning. You're discussion with that Sock Troll will inevitably end with him or her ridiculing you with repetitive 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. I can't tell you what to do, but i thought i would give you the heads up. Your discussions with him or her will always end the same way...You're just a 'Tinfoil Hat-wearing Nut.' Good luck.
Sure thing SAYIT/candyass/obamerican and so on. Whatever.
really? Quote: Originally Posted by Raincat View PostHey@! I never even used the phrase "should have"!
Can you have your mommy read what I posted,please?
MOPP Level 4 All protection worn.Hazemat, if that's what they were, were not needed to handle a gun found out side the blood contaminated area. And why would the police have a suspects car towed away from the crime scene before going over it for obvious clues? Also was this the guy who booby trapped his apartment? those could have been bomb suits for all we know. And it is possible that they had cleared the vehicle before the video shows the officer clearing the weapon, which would have been difficult to do in a Hazemat or bomb suit...
If you have any military experience think MOPP4 times 10.....
Hazemat, if that's what they were, were not needed to handle a gun found out side the blood contaminated area. And why would the police have a suspects car towed away from the crime scene before going over it for obvious clues? Also was this the guy who booby trapped his apartment? those could have been bomb suits for all we know. And it is possible that they had cleared the vehicle before the video shows the officer clearing the weapon, which would have been difficult to do in a Hazemat or bomb suit...
If you have any military experience think MOPP4 times 10.....
Oh,dear..I am sorry,I did say that "should" word!really? Quote: Originally Posted by Raincat View PostHey@! I never even used the phrase "should have"!
Can you have your mommy read what I posted,please?
So what? Really?is that your best reply?
You dont think the hazmat crew should have.
might want to get your mommy to wipe the shit out of your eyes!
Hazemat, if that's what they were, were not needed to handle a gun found out side the blood contaminated area. And why would the police have a suspects car towed away from the crime scene before going over it for obvious clues? Also was this the guy who booby trapped his apartment? those could have been bomb suits for all we know. And it is possible that they had cleared the vehicle before the video shows the officer clearing the weapon, which would have been difficult to do in a Hazemat or bomb suit...
If you have any military experience think MOPP4 times 10.....
You sir,have a point there,but still questions remain.
I am a person who scoffed at such "conspiracy theory" ideas myself...
The gunman behind the shooting massacre at Connecticut’s Sandy Hook Elementary School reportedly compiled extensive research about previous mass murders into a spreadsheet containing roughly 500 people.
The New York Daily News reports that an obsessive Adam Lanza produced a spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide in tiny 9-point font that required a special printer on past mass killings and attempted murders.
“We were told [Lanza] had around 500 people on this sheet,” a law enforcement veteran told the newspaper. “Names and the number of people killed and the weapons that were used, even the precise make and model of the weapons. It had to have taken years. It sounded like a doctoral thesis, that was the quality of the research.”
