g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,228
- 68,948
- 2,605
The chances of a mass murderer mowing down a bunch of people in a Sonic or Chili's is extremely remote. You'll die from a falling meteor five minutes after winning the Powerball jackpot before you get killed in a Sonic.
The chances of a Sonic or Chili's experiencing a robbery are relatively much, much higher.
Going with the actuarials, then, it makes perfect sense for Sonic and Chili's and every other public place to adopt a policy of strict non-violence as well as a no gun policy.
That is why such places tell their employees to offer NO resistance to a robber and to just give them the cash. These establishments will get their money back from their insurance company, and the odds of anyone getting hurt following these policies is practically nil.
Those odds climb radically if you have some hair trigger yahoos toting long rifles around these places. The chances of an innocent person being injured or killed in a shootout is sky high.
Cash can be replaced. Lives and limbs cannot.
These policies are part of a comprehensive safety and deterrence plan. In addition to banning guns and offering no violent resistance to robbers, many establishments also have a maximum cash amount allowed to be kept in their registers.
This is not a "liberal" thing. It is a well-reasoned business decision based on years of experience and actuarials.
These jackholes with their long guns and shit do not speak for all gun owners. They don't even speak for a majority of gun owners. They are ignorant yahoos and deserve ridicule and scorn for trying to force a business to endanger their customers. They are behaving in a manner that is entirely counterproductive to gun rights. They are actually creating an extremely negative stereotype of gun owners.
The chances of a Sonic or Chili's experiencing a robbery are relatively much, much higher.
Going with the actuarials, then, it makes perfect sense for Sonic and Chili's and every other public place to adopt a policy of strict non-violence as well as a no gun policy.
That is why such places tell their employees to offer NO resistance to a robber and to just give them the cash. These establishments will get their money back from their insurance company, and the odds of anyone getting hurt following these policies is practically nil.
Those odds climb radically if you have some hair trigger yahoos toting long rifles around these places. The chances of an innocent person being injured or killed in a shootout is sky high.
Cash can be replaced. Lives and limbs cannot.
These policies are part of a comprehensive safety and deterrence plan. In addition to banning guns and offering no violent resistance to robbers, many establishments also have a maximum cash amount allowed to be kept in their registers.
This is not a "liberal" thing. It is a well-reasoned business decision based on years of experience and actuarials.
These jackholes with their long guns and shit do not speak for all gun owners. They don't even speak for a majority of gun owners. They are ignorant yahoos and deserve ridicule and scorn for trying to force a business to endanger their customers. They are behaving in a manner that is entirely counterproductive to gun rights. They are actually creating an extremely negative stereotype of gun owners.
Last edited: