Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do people laugh out loud when you spout nonsense like that in real life, Daniel? Or do they just shake their heads and walk away?It means you can quit on an at-will basis with no legal or moral prejudice.No, in the law, at will employment means you can't be forced into a job and the boss can't be forced to keep you. That's all it means. Seriously, learn something.What right wingers keep stating is that their bigotry not the law is what is important. At-will means at the will of either party not just the employer or the State.What Daniel is trying to say is that he wants to be paid even if he refuses to work a job. He doesn't understand that at-will means you can quit and you can be fired, that's it.The left has a solution for that. Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation our at-will employment States.Raise minimum wage to increase prices for goods. Then minimum wage purchases the exact same amount of goods or services.Raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.The dems don’t understand economics or even math.
They think that the rich are somehow locked into staying in high tax areas. They think that their money can’t be moved into other countries.
They don’t realize that businesses can leave money overseas Instead of bringing it into the U.S. where it spends just as well there.
They don’t realize that businesses are not going to take a hit to the bottom line, they will just pass that hit onto higher prices for the consumer.
so it ends up as a wash other then it looks good.
Yep. When you increase the minimum wage, you increase everyone else's wages because minimum wage by definition goes to the lowest value employees. So you have to pay the others proportionately more.
Then their companies raise prices and it all balances out again. Then a Democrat raises their hand and says I have an idea, let's increase the minimum wage ...
The problem is that's best case for low end workers, that it just doesn't work. The reality is that businesses constantly use those increased costs to streamline, optimize and automate processes. Which results in fewer low end jobs.
The low end workers are actually the victims of minimum wage increases. Democrats of course don't care, it was never about helping anyone. They want them to be poor so they stay Democrats
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
Employment is at the will of either party? Have ever actually HELD a job, Daniel? Until someone hires you...you don't really have a say in the matter. Once you DO have a job...you have the choice to stay or go and your boss has the choice to keep you on or let you go. I'm guessing that you don't make it through the interview portion of any hiring process though...as soon as you start spouting your typical nonsensical bullshit any potential employer is going thank you for coming in and show you the door!lol. You have no understanding only right wing fantasy. Employment is at the will of either party.No one is taking you seriously because you spout nonsense. Equal protection of the law means the law is applied to everyone. That means that ANYONE who meets the criteria can get welfare. That's all it means. Let's put it this way, since you are so dogmatic about it. The law states that a person who earns under a certain amount of money each year ends up paying no federal income taxes. Under your twisted interpretation, that is not equal protection under the law because the very wealthy have to pay a lot of taxes. It's means tested taxation, so give me a solid rationale why the two are different and you support the one but not the other.
No. They tend to understand our federal and State Constitutions. Only right wingers prefer to have nothing but Hoax.Do people laugh out loud when you spout nonsense like that in real life, Daniel? Or do they just shake their heads and walk away?It means you can quit on an at-will basis with no legal or moral prejudice.No, in the law, at will employment means you can't be forced into a job and the boss can't be forced to keep you. That's all it means. Seriously, learn something.What right wingers keep stating is that their bigotry not the law is what is important. At-will means at the will of either party not just the employer or the State.What Daniel is trying to say is that he wants to be paid even if he refuses to work a job. He doesn't understand that at-will means you can quit and you can be fired, that's it.The left has a solution for that. Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation our at-will employment States.Raise minimum wage to increase prices for goods. Then minimum wage purchases the exact same amount of goods or services.Raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.The dems don’t understand economics or even math.
They think that the rich are somehow locked into staying in high tax areas. They think that their money can’t be moved into other countries.
They don’t realize that businesses can leave money overseas Instead of bringing it into the U.S. where it spends just as well there.
They don’t realize that businesses are not going to take a hit to the bottom line, they will just pass that hit onto higher prices for the consumer.
so it ends up as a wash other then it looks good.
Yep. When you increase the minimum wage, you increase everyone else's wages because minimum wage by definition goes to the lowest value employees. So you have to pay the others proportionately more.
Then their companies raise prices and it all balances out again. Then a Democrat raises their hand and says I have an idea, let's increase the minimum wage ...
The problem is that's best case for low end workers, that it just doesn't work. The reality is that businesses constantly use those increased costs to streamline, optimize and automate processes. Which results in fewer low end jobs.
The low end workers are actually the victims of minimum wage increases. Democrats of course don't care, it was never about helping anyone. They want them to be poor so they stay Democrats
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
lol. I understand the law not Right Wing Hoax.Employment is at the will of either party? Have ever actually HELD a job, Daniel? Until someone hires you...you don't really have a say in the matter. Once you DO have a job...you have the choice to stay or go and your boss has the choice to keep you on or let you go. I'm guessing that you don't make it through the interview portion of any hiring process though...as soon as you start spouting your typical nonsensical bullshit any potential employer is going thank you for coming in and show you the door!lol. You have no understanding only right wing fantasy. Employment is at the will of either party.No one is taking you seriously because you spout nonsense. Equal protection of the law means the law is applied to everyone. That means that ANYONE who meets the criteria can get welfare. That's all it means. Let's put it this way, since you are so dogmatic about it. The law states that a person who earns under a certain amount of money each year ends up paying no federal income taxes. Under your twisted interpretation, that is not equal protection under the law because the very wealthy have to pay a lot of taxes. It's means tested taxation, so give me a solid rationale why the two are different and you support the one but not the other.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
I truly hope this election is overturned and we don't have to find out just how wrong you are. Globalism sucks.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
I truly hope this election is overturned and we don't have to find out just how wrong you are. Globalism sucks.
Why do you believe that? Free market capitalism is free market globalism.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
I truly hope this election is overturned and we don't have to find out just how wrong you are. Globalism sucks.
Why do you believe that? Free market capitalism is free market globalism.
I'm a protectionist. I believe in protecting my country and its workers from foreign vultures like China.
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
I truly hope this election is overturned and we don't have to find out just how wrong you are. Globalism sucks.
Why do you believe that? Free market capitalism is free market globalism.
I'm a protectionist. I believe in protecting my country and its workers from foreign vultures like China.
How does that work with (free market) Capitalism?
That never works. It's a paradox, just like raising taxes sometime results in a lower tax receipt. We'd do better to deport the illegal aliens and let wages rise on their own just like they were doing before the pandemic.Why not raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue?
I agree to disagree. It must work, and not only that, wages must outpace inflation on an Institutional basis.That never works. It's a paradox, just like raising taxes sometime results in a lower tax receipt. We'd do better to deport the illegal aliens and let wages rise on their own just like they were doing before the pandemic.Why not raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue?
There are real structural problems with our economy. It only got worse with Right Wing tax cut economics.Raising taxes on the rich was just a lie to get gullible, jealous and stupid middle class voters to vote Democrat. I know a lot of people who fell for it. I need to trade them for a smarter class of acquaintances.
So your "idea" is to give lower income people higher wages...which will result in many of them being laid off from their jobs...but then hit those that still have a job with higher taxes so they don't really make any more take home pay? Brilliant, Daniel!Why not raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue?
Exactly, so you can stop pretending it has anything to do with you getting paid when you refuse to work an available job.It means you can quit on an at-will basis with no legal or moral prejudice.No, in the law, at will employment means you can't be forced into a job and the boss can't be forced to keep you. That's all it means. Seriously, learn something.What right wingers keep stating is that their bigotry not the law is what is important. At-will means at the will of either party not just the employer or the State.What Daniel is trying to say is that he wants to be paid even if he refuses to work a job. He doesn't understand that at-will means you can quit and you can be fired, that's it.The left has a solution for that. Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation our at-will employment States.Raise minimum wage to increase prices for goods. Then minimum wage purchases the exact same amount of goods or services.Raise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.The dems don’t understand economics or even math.
They think that the rich are somehow locked into staying in high tax areas. They think that their money can’t be moved into other countries.
They don’t realize that businesses can leave money overseas Instead of bringing it into the U.S. where it spends just as well there.
They don’t realize that businesses are not going to take a hit to the bottom line, they will just pass that hit onto higher prices for the consumer.
so it ends up as a wash other then it looks good.
Yep. When you increase the minimum wage, you increase everyone else's wages because minimum wage by definition goes to the lowest value employees. So you have to pay the others proportionately more.
Then their companies raise prices and it all balances out again. Then a Democrat raises their hand and says I have an idea, let's increase the minimum wage ...
The problem is that's best case for low end workers, that it just doesn't work. The reality is that businesses constantly use those increased costs to streamline, optimize and automate processes. Which results in fewer low end jobs.
The low end workers are actually the victims of minimum wage increases. Democrats of course don't care, it was never about helping anyone. They want them to be poor so they stay Democrats
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
That doesn't address the fallacy in your argument.In right wing fantasy you are Always Right; it just seems like Hoax to the rest of us.A COLA that would bankrupt the country. You can't go that far that fast without bad consequences.A cost of living adjustment. Or, stop complaining that the Poor don't pay enough in taxes or cost too much in social services.You're ignoring the ripple effect. More than half the work force makes $20/hr or less. All of them would demand a raise. Add to that everyone who now makes between $7 and $15, and no, it's not 5%.Then why complain about the less than five percent who work minimum wage jobs getting a higher statutory minimum wage that is a simple cost of living adjustment?I don’t know where you live but where most people live the cost of labor has been going up. In my area you can go to work at McDonalds for more then minimum wage.Prices have been going up anyway; only the minimum wage was not being raised on a regular basis to keep up with inflation.You just don’t get it. Raise minimum wage prices go up. So the only thing you are doing is making the poor slob have less money in their pocket because of taxes. So I guess you want people to either stop working or have less money to spendRaise the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue."Above all things, good policy is to be used that the treasure and monies in a state be not gathered into few hands. For otherwise a state may have a great stock, and yet starve. And money is like muck, not good except it be spread"
-- Francis Bacon; from 'Of Seditions and Troubles'
Minimum wage of $15.00 an hour will not get you the same things as other areas.
I know that you are unable to comprehend this but why not allow states to set minimum wage since they understand their economy better then the federal government? Oh I know because then the federal government would not be in charge of everything in people’s lives
Incorrect. UNEMPLYMENT is at the will of either party. You don't have the right to declare yourself employed so you can collect unemployment compensation. Now, will you address the reality that I have exposed a gaping hypocrisy in your equal protection under the law fallacy? You can't argue on the one hand the it requires you to paid even if you refuse an available job while on the other claim it is equal protection for some people to pay more taxes than other people.lol. You have no understanding only right wing fantasy. Employment is at the will of either party.No one is taking you seriously because you spout nonsense. Equal protection of the law means the law is applied to everyone. That means that ANYONE who meets the criteria can get welfare. That's all it means. Let's put it this way, since you are so dogmatic about it. The law states that a person who earns under a certain amount of money each year ends up paying no federal income taxes. Under your twisted interpretation, that is not equal protection under the law because the very wealthy have to pay a lot of taxes. It's means tested taxation, so give me a solid rationale why the two are different and you support the one but not the other.
