joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
I
Ask the Lancet about how some of their studies have come back to bite them in the ass.
Maybe the people doing it didn't assume people would assume the numbers as fact in a bid for a cheap political win.
Good idea to stick with 64....makes your orange king happy.
You didn't actually respond to my statements, you gutless hack.
I believe Harvard....but u stick with your barely literate trump....stock with 64....
Um, it wasn't trump, it was an official FEMA or whatever agency estimate.
The buck stops at trump.
Never!