Turns out Russians hacked systems in 39 states. Did Republicans help?

[Faun]

That's what you said "no one has accused the russians of changing votes" as a defense. No one has accused them of getting information either. Would you like to change that defense? Because you can't have it both ways

What defense? It would be nice for everyone to be on the same page about what actually happened and how Trump and DA ROOSHANS managed to single handedly deny Queen Hillary her birthright to the throne.

It would be nice if you didn't deflect and provide BS excuses only to go back on them 1 post later

Excuses for what? Somebody found and published the truth about Hillary and the DNC. That happened, and the good news is that she is not living in the White House.

There's no indication that votes were switched after being cast. Heck, there's no indication of the stuff we do to other countries to get a government we like better. Just ask Ghaddafi how much respect Obama and Hillary had for his country's policies.

I'm cynically mocking the less intellectually rigorous who are shocked, just shocked, I tells ya, that some other country would try to get an American administration they prefer. What, you think they're just going to sit by and hope when they can at least get information they might be able to use later? Assuming DA ROOSHANS really did it, you should be glad they released it. Had they not and Hillary won, they would have had excellent blackmail material.

In fact, that's a strong argument for them NOT having done it. The smart use of such information lies in the leverage it gives you, not in jumping up and down yelling, "Look what I have".

Stop with the strawman... no one is claiming votes already cast were altered.

Define "interfere".

 

[kwc57]

well comey stated just the opposite and I trust him there and never you.

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

Is English too tough for ya? Their attempts were successful. Look at the second of those questions...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.​

No one disputes they were able to access data. But what precisely were they able to do with or to that data that actually interfered with the election? Nothing. It was a free and fair election and Trump won. I understand that you and others just can't wrap your little spoon fed minds around it, but there it is. Good luck in 2020. Given the lack of real reflection going on and the large amount of excuses being made, I think you're going to be in for an additional four years of heartbreak if you continue to believe the American people want socialist policies and that Hillary was a great candidate.

Great. You get caught telling one lie, so then you move onto another lie. Figures.

Firs you try to pretend like they didn't actually hack us; that they only "attempted." Called on that lie, you acquiesce, ok, so they hacked us; but then you lie and claim they were able to do "nothing" with the data they obtained from their hacking.

What they were able to do with it was release dirt they found on Democrats. There's no question that cost votes. Was it enough to affect the outcome of the election? We may never know. But to pretend it had no impact at all on the election is brutally dishonest.

Holy shit! Do you have ADHD? The hacking of 39 state election systems and the hacking of the DNC are two different things. The DNC's dirty tactics being exposed thru wikileaks and someone accessing your voting records are not the same thing. You need to breathe into a paper sack or something before you hyperventilate. Hillary and the DNC have no one but themselves for how people may have reacted to THEIR actions. Hell, this whole collusion witch hunt is nothing more than people who got caught with their pants down wanting to spread their shame by trying to find someone lese with their pants down. Grow up and accept some responsibility for your actions.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If you don't condemn such activity, then you are a willing lackey and dupe of the Russians.

I condemn anyone from interfering in our country. Now prove someone actually did? All interference at the moment is lefturds making false accusations at the people's president. Obviously not theirs.

Wrong. Trump has acknowledged the Russians interfered, as have other Republicans.

But the question remains, why is Trump so afraid of this investigation? His behaviour screams guilty as hell. Innocent people don't care what the investigation finds, they just want to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Only someone who is guilty fires the guy who won't shut down the investigation.

well comey stated just the opposite and I trust him there and never you.

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

 

[Faun]

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

Is English too tough for ya? Their attempts were successful. Look at the second of those questions...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.​

No one disputes they were able to access data. But what precisely were they able to do with or to that data that actually interfered with the election? Nothing. It was a free and fair election and Trump won. I understand that you and others just can't wrap your little spoon fed minds around it, but there it is. Good luck in 2020. Given the lack of real reflection going on and the large amount of excuses being made, I think you're going to be in for an additional four years of heartbreak if you continue to believe the American people want socialist policies and that Hillary was a great candidate.

Great. You get caught telling one lie, so then you move onto another lie. Figures.

Firs you try to pretend like they didn't actually hack us; that they only "attempted." Called on that lie, you acquiesce, ok, so they hacked us; but then you lie and claim they were able to do "nothing" with the data they obtained from their hacking.

What they were able to do with it was release dirt they found on Democrats. There's no question that cost votes. Was it enough to affect the outcome of the election? We may never know. But to pretend it had no impact at all on the election is brutally dishonest.

Holy shit! Do you have ADHD? The hacking of 39 state election systems and the hacking of the DNC are two different things. The DNC's dirty tactics being exposed thru wikileaks and someone accessing your voting records are not the same thing. You need to breathe into a paper sack or something before you hyperventilate. Hillary and the DNC have no one but themselves for how people may have reacted to THEIR actions. Hell, this whole collusion witch hunt is nothing more than people who got caught with their pants down wanting to spread their shame by trying to find someone lese with their pants down. Grow up and accept some responsibility for your actions.

You're completely demented.

I was talking about Comey's testimony where he acknowledged the DNC and DCCC were "no doubt" hacked. I said nothing here about the other hackings reported this week.

So now you just went from telling one lie ... to a second lie ... to ascribing to me something I'm not even discussing right now.

You're 0 for 3, Loser.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

Is English too tough for ya? Their attempts were successful. Look at the second of those questions...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.​

No one disputes they were able to access data. But what precisely were they able to do with or to that data that actually interfered with the election? Nothing. It was a free and fair election and Trump won. I understand that you and others just can't wrap your little spoon fed minds around it, but there it is. Good luck in 2020. Given the lack of real reflection going on and the large amount of excuses being made, I think you're going to be in for an additional four years of heartbreak if you continue to believe the American people want socialist policies and that Hillary was a great candidate.

Great. You get caught telling one lie, so then you move onto another lie. Figures.

Firs you try to pretend like they didn't actually hack us; that they only "attempted." Called on that lie, you acquiesce, ok, so they hacked us; but then you lie and claim they were able to do "nothing" with the data they obtained from their hacking.

What they were able to do with it was release dirt they found on Democrats. There's no question that cost votes. Was it enough to affect the outcome of the election? We may never know. But to pretend it had no impact at all on the election is brutally dishonest.

Holy shit! Do you have ADHD? The hacking of 39 state election systems and the hacking of the DNC are two different things. The DNC's dirty tactics being exposed thru wikileaks and someone accessing your voting records are not the same thing. You need to breathe into a paper sack or something before you hyperventilate. Hillary and the DNC have no one but themselves for how people may have reacted to THEIR actions. Hell, this whole collusion witch hunt is nothing more than people who got caught with their pants down wanting to spread their shame by trying to find someone lese with their pants down. Grow up and accept some responsibility for your actions.

No matter how much you yell "Clinton" and "DNC" and 'Benghazi", the focus of the investigation is on the Russians and those who helped them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

kwc, you are lying and you are getting caught in every lie.

You are a major liability to your side.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Who was president when all this was happening?

It's OK. Republicans were traitors then and they are traitors now. They love Russia. The new GOP "fad".

So, when did Russia become the enemy of USA.INC again? I mean, it was a manufactured enemy to begin with that was nurtured and funded to be a "ying" to the "yang" of USA.INC so that we had something to fear and rally behind. Without Wall Street, there could have been no Bolshevik Revolution....without the international bankers funding it, there could have been no alleged "formidable foe" to threaten the hegemony of USA.INC. Your beloved owners of USA.INC have been complicit in the death of hundreds of millions of people. Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung were put into power by the same owners of USA.INC. They funded Hitler as well and when his purpose was finished?? He retired to South America and lived out his days.

So much that those like you have no clue about..............love that left versus right paradigm, don't ya? Because it's a "safe place" and a place that you understand and a place that you think that your mere postings sway the populace. I simply have to laugh at the ludicrous notion of it all........

Postings do not make any change, it a form of freedom that we have to exchange ideas, and debate. Other Nation you do not have this freedom. You try to say anything like most of the people do on this board in China you will be put in prison or shot at sunrise. I hosted a friend from Russia and he was out of his mind on what we said about the President and could not beleive the FBI did not show up at the door the next morning. So don't say postings does not make the diff. Its just a little cog in a very big wheel.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I condemn anyone from interfering in our country. Now prove someone actually did? All interference at the moment is lefturds making false accusations at the people's president. Obviously not theirs.

Wrong. Trump has acknowledged the Russians interfered, as have other Republicans.

But the question remains, why is Trump so afraid of this investigation? His behaviour screams guilty as hell. Innocent people don't care what the investigation finds, they just want to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Only someone who is guilty fires the guy who won't shut down the investigation.

well comey stated just the opposite and I trust him there and never you.

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"The ROOSKIES stole the election so they could be mean to leftards!!!!!"


(Face palm) So here is the second propaganda wave of the deep state and this is the best that they could do? Now, I do know a bit about firewalls and software that has "back-door" entrances but the fact of the matter is that the Hildebeast couldn't draw flies to her infrequent appearances....the Wikileaks showed that the DNC and the lame stream media had conspired to not only steal the nomination for Hildebeast but to also steal the election. She was the most godawful candidate ever put on the leftard ballot. If there was any "Rooskie" intervention,it would have been on behalf of the Hildebeast because they had that bitch compromised to the tenth degree with the 143 million dollars donated to her slush fund disguised as a "benevolent charitable foundation" that has since been shut down. Russia had 143 million reasons to want to keep the Hildebeast in their back pocket if there is even a red klunt hair's degree of truth to this and I say it's total bullshit.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

Is English too tough for ya? Their attempts were successful. Look at the second of those questions...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.​

No one disputes they were able to access data. But what precisely were they able to do with or to that data that actually interfered with the election? Nothing. It was a free and fair election and Trump won. I understand that you and others just can't wrap your little spoon fed minds around it, but there it is. Good luck in 2020. Given the lack of real reflection going on and the large amount of excuses being made, I think you're going to be in for an additional four years of heartbreak if you continue to believe the American people want socialist policies and that Hillary was a great candidate.

Great. You get caught telling one lie, so then you move onto another lie. Figures.

Firs you try to pretend like they didn't actually hack us; that they only "attempted." Called on that lie, you acquiesce, ok, so they hacked us; but then you lie and claim they were able to do "nothing" with the data they obtained from their hacking.

What they were able to do with it was release dirt they found on Democrats. There's no question that cost votes. Was it enough to affect the outcome of the election? We may never know. But to pretend it had no impact at all on the election is brutally dishonest.

Holy shit! Do you have ADHD? The hacking of 39 state election systems and the hacking of the DNC are two different things. The DNC's dirty tactics being exposed thru wikileaks and someone accessing your voting records are not the same thing. You need to breathe into a paper sack or something before you hyperventilate. Hillary and the DNC have no one but themselves for how people may have reacted to THEIR actions. Hell, this whole collusion witch hunt is nothing more than people who got caught with their pants down wanting to spread their shame by trying to find someone lese with their pants down. Grow up and accept some responsibility for your actions.

No matter how much you yell "Clinton" and "DNC" and 'Benghazi", the focus of the investigation is on the Russians and those who helped them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wrong. Trump has acknowledged the Russians interfered, as have other Republicans.

But the question remains, why is Trump so afraid of this investigation? His behaviour screams guilty as hell. Innocent people don't care what the investigation finds, they just want to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Only someone who is guilty fires the guy who won't shut down the investigation.

well comey stated just the opposite and I trust him there and never you.

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known

The White House provided evidence gathered on Russia’s hacking efforts and reasons why the U.S. considered it dangerously aggressive. Russia responded by asking for more information and providing assurances that it would look into the matter even as the hacking continued, according to the two people familiar with the response.

In early July 2016, a contractor who works two or three days a week at the state board of elections detected unauthorized data leaving the network, according to Ken Menzel, general counsel for the Illinois board of elections. The hackers had gained access to the state’s voter database, which contained information such as names, dates of birth, genders, driver’s licenses and partial Social Security numbers on 15 million people, half of whom were active voters. As many as 90,000 records were ultimately compromised.

----------------------------

Wow, and remember, Trump only won by 77 thousand in three states.

I'm sure Republicans aren't seeing a problem. After all, they now love Russia. They think Putin is great.

If Republicans love Putin, which they do, then they must admit they love Saddam. After all, there really isn't much of a difference between Putin and Saddam. Except Putin is Trump's boss. Putin is the proud owner of an Orange Haired Russian Poodle. His "papers" show he is pure bred Manchurian.

Did you find the real birth certificate yet?

No one will post the IPs of the violation. Why we would like to do the trace for them. Free, cheap, done by thousand of computer hackers. why? Just to solve the question, and its fun.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

well comey stated just the opposite and I trust him there and never you.

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

So you are denying that under DumBama, we did the same thing; try to influence elections?

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Who was president when all this was happening?

It's OK. Republicans were traitors then and they are traitors now. They love Russia. The new GOP "fad".

After reading and listening to the DNC, Progressive, and Soros plans for this Nation, I would rather live under the Russian flag that is how bad the other side would be.

 

[Dale Smith]

Who was president when all this was happening?

It's OK. Republicans were traitors then and they are traitors now. They love Russia. The new GOP "fad".

So, when did Russia become the enemy of USA.INC again? I mean, it was a manufactured enemy to begin with that was nurtured and funded to be a "ying" to the "yang" of USA.INC so that we had something to fear and rally behind. Without Wall Street, there could have been no Bolshevik Revolution....without the international bankers funding it, there could have been no alleged "formidable foe" to threaten the hegemony of USA.INC. Your beloved owners of USA.INC have been complicit in the death of hundreds of millions of people. Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung were put into power by the same owners of USA.INC. They funded Hitler as well and when his purpose was finished?? He retired to South America and lived out his days.

So much that those like you have no clue about..............love that left versus right paradigm, don't ya? Because it's a "safe place" and a place that you understand and a place that you think that your mere postings sway the populace. I simply have to laugh at the ludicrous notion of it all........

Postings do not make any change, it a form of freedom that we have to exchange ideas, and debate. Other Nation you do not have this freedom. You try to say anything like most of the people do on this board in China you will be put in prison or shot at sunrise. I hosted a friend from Russia and he was out of his mind on what we said about the President and could not beleive the FBI did not show up at the door the next morning. So don't say postings does not make the diff. Its just a little cog in a very big wheel.

In the great big scheme of things, I do not believe what we post on social media does anything....what it does do is give the "Deep State" the information that it needs to create a profile on you and how you lean politically. We have 80 fusion centers that do nothing but crunch data and then sends it to the big NSA data base in Utah that assesses what they call a "threat matrix score" and I am sure that mine is off the charts and that my views pose a threat to their "end game" and I am glad that it does because I am their worst nightmare. You see, I know the truth about how this system works, it's origins and where it is heading. I have had thousands of posts deleted where I expose the criminal and unconstitutional Federal Reserve central bank on forums like news sites even though I violated no "Terms Of Service" agreements. The bottom line is that they do not want me to reveal the things that I know. The internet is a dual-edged sword....on one hand they want to know where we stand and what we know...on the other hand it has been an incredible tool to wake people up. What we post here on this forum is only read by those that belong to this forum and know about it's existence...thus my comment.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Good, since you trust Comey, you can no longer deny the Russians hacked our election...

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.​

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

So you are denying that under DumBama, we did the same thing; try to influence elections?

Fallacy of false equivalency.

The Russians hacked our elections and now we are trying to find out if Americans helped them.

Why are you on the side of the Russians?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Who was president when all this was happening?

It's OK. Republicans were traitors then and they are traitors now. They love Russia. The new GOP "fad".

After reading and listening to the DNC, Progressive, and Soros plans for this Nation, I would rather live under the Russian flag that is how bad the other side would be.

You are wrong but so noted.

 

[Doc1]

You're willfully overlooking a key word in that exchange. "Attempted ". They hacked into state election board systems in an attempt to hack disrupt the system, but they failed. So no, they didn't "hack the election". Words matter and they matter a lot. Liberals throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks isn't going to get you what you want. Logic and reason will kick your ass every time.

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

So you are denying that under DumBama, we did the same thing; try to influence elections?

Fallacy of false equivalency.

The Russians hacked our elections and now we are trying to find out if Americans helped them.

Why are you on the side of the Russians?

So the Russians gave us Trump?

 

[JakeStarkey]

You fail so bigly. They hacked the systems. That is a cyber crime. The very fact they attempt to hack is a crime. And any American who aid or abetted in any form that cyber attack on America has committed seditiion.

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

So you are denying that under DumBama, we did the same thing; try to influence elections?

Fallacy of false equivalency.

The Russians hacked our elections and now we are trying to find out if Americans helped them.

Why are you on the side of the Russians?

So the Russians gave us Trump?

Do you think so, Bakersfield? I don't think so, but I believe they tried their level best. If any American colluded with them, then that will be a life sentence if found guilty, I hope.

 

[Doc1]

So is Obama a criminal now?

Fallacy of false equivalency but go ahead and argue it.

So you are denying that under DumBama, we did the same thing; try to influence elections?

Fallacy of false equivalency.

The Russians hacked our elections and now we are trying to find out if Americans helped them.

Why are you on the side of the Russians?

So the Russians gave us Trump?

Do you think so, Bakersfield? I don't think so, but I believe they tried their level best. If any American colluded with them, then that will be a life sentence if found guilty, I hope.

You don't like Bako? I do, it's not typical Cali. We'll see if any "collusion" is found. That word seems to be all the rage of you Lefty's.